The Christchurch earthquake song

I am not sure if I am being led in a direction that I don’t want to go - but then again, it never harms us to wonder...

The Christchurch Earthquake Song (Played On A HAARP)

Part one

Part two

Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?

Printed in Uncensored magazine, March 4,  2011


Please do as you wish with this e-mail, but if you feel that this raises some legitimate questions in your mind please forward this to as many other people as possible. I also encourage you to cross check and research this information yourself rather than just accepting the information below as fact…..or fiction.  The people of Christchurch and NZ deserve to at least be made aware of this important information. Many thanks for your help in raising awareness of this around NZ in honour of Christchurch and all its victims

Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster? 

This question sounds impossibly implausible but there is considerable evidence to suggest that the Christchurch earthquake is very suspicious and there is a lot of information that deserves to be seen and considered by all people of NZ regarding this question.  Out of respect for the victims of Christchurch , we owe it to them to have this information below distributed across NZ and looked at and considered fully.

Firstly, are man made earthquakes possible? 

The answer is absolutely yes.  Here is a very quick science lesson on this and then we will look at the scientific evidence and circumstantial evidence that casts some highly significant suspicions around the Christchurch earthquake:

What is HAARP?

High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project. 

See: www.haarp.net http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

• The main HAARP facility is based in Alaska (although there are several others) and is capable of sending several billion watts of electromagnetic pulses into the upper atmosphere and can bounce these pulses off either the upper ionosphere or off satellites, and direct these pulses to a location anywhere on the earth, either above or below ground level.

• Could these pulses potentially be used to create earthquakes?  Yes.  This is the same sort of technology that geologists use to help locate oil and gas fields underground, however they use only a tiny fraction of the power level that HAARP uses.  With the power level that HAARP has, geologists have stated that this would certainly be enough to potentially cause a large earthquake. See brief segment of a TV documentary in 2010 explaining this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR6O3kJTqaI

HAARP pulses require assistance in the atmosphere

• For HAARP pulses to be more effectively transmitted through the atmosphere, it helps greatly to have something in the atmosphere to assist this.  If large quantities of materials such as fine particle aluminium are present in the atmosphere it can create a type of ‘atmospheric plasma’ for the HAARP pulses to travel through.

• This process of ‘seeding the atmosphere’ with large amounts of fine particle aluminium has been seen in huge abundance across the South Island over the past few months; numerous aircraft have been seen leaving long thick trails of a white substance that stays in the sky for many hours and spreads out to form milky, hazy, metallic looking clouds. Please See http://chemtrailsnz.co.cc/ and see the last 30 seconds of the documentary link above

Could some nations already be using this technology to artificially create earthquakes?

There is much evidence and discussion to strongly indicate that at least several nations are already actively using this type of technology for a variety of potential purposes based around substantial manipulation of the environment.  Here is just one of numerous quotes and references regarding this:  “Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts.” – US Secretary of Defence, William Cohen, 1997

Strong evidence that HAARP was in operation over Christchurch just prior to the earthquake 

1.   There was a large amount of spraying of white ‘atmospheric aerosol material’ into the sky by aircraft in the surrounding area of Christchurch witnessed by many people in the days leading up to the quake. Outside of the NZ Govt, who else would have the capacity to utilise aircraft in NZ air space in this way?  Probably only the US Airforce from their multiple bases within NZ.

2.   Photos of the sky in the area on Feb 21 show large amounts of multi coloured ‘rainbow clouds’, Please See http://thecontrail.com/photo/albums/rangiora-sky-crap-day-before that many experts believe are related to HAARP activity and which also appeared in the skies in exactly the same way just before other recent large earthquakes, Please See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4&feature=related

3.   The measurement charts showing the level of power being emitted from various HAARP installations show a sudden surge of power being emitted simultaneously from three different HAARP installations in the US just a few hours before the Christchurch quake (Scientists believe that there would likely be a small time delay between HAARP activity and a potential seismic event such as this). These three HAARP power surges are shown on one of the graphs on the link below.  A ‘HAARP Induction Magnetometer’ graph on the link below also shows the same HAARP surge at the same time.  This simultaneous HAARP surge coincided with what is termed a ‘global quake’ where there was a small amount of seismic activity recorded at places all across the planet (shown on one of the graphs on the link below), however by far the strongest of these ‘global quakes’ was the Christchurch quake. It could be theorised that the large EM pulses being emitted from the three HAARP installations had a minor effect on the whole planet but that they were potentially focussed onto the Christchurch area. http://thecontrail.com/photo/albums/activiy-around-the

4. Coinciding with the time period of increased HAARP activity, there was a mass stranding of dolphins in the Thames Estuary on Feb 21 and there was a mass stranding of whales at Stewart Island on Feb 20 (http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/4681546/100-stranded-whales-die-on-Stewart-Island).  This is very consistent with the other recent large earthquakes mentioned above which were also preceded by mass strandings of dolphins and whales in the 48 hours prior to the quakes hitting.  It is thought that electromagnetic pulses from HAARP can seriously disrupt the navigation systems of dolphins and whales as they are used to receiving EM pulses from below them rather than from above them. 5. The area where this earthquake hit and where the original Christchurch earthquake hit in September 2010 has no previously significant earthquake fault line and geologists are very surprised by these earthquakes occurring there.  This geological anomaly is the same as with the Haiti earthquake.  The strange circumstances of the Feb 22 earthquake have caused disagreement by earthquake experts as to the exact cause. http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/8918396/dispute-on-whether-latest-quake-is-an-aftershock/ 

Other strange coincidences and anomalies with the Christchurch earthquake 1. 9 members of US Congress were in Christchurch for a summit meeting on Feb 21 & 22 but left Christchurch 2.5 hours before the earthquake hit and relocated to Wellington even though the meeting was not due to finish until the evening of Feb 22nd. 

(http://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/report-nine-us-congressmen-left-christchurch-right-before-quake-hit/) 

2. The US Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, was supposed to be visiting Christchurch and speaking at the summit meeting on Feb 22, but on Feb 18 announced she was cancelling her visit 3. The Deputy Administrator of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), Timothy Manning, just happened to be in Christchurch at the time with a US delegation. (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2011/02/fema_official_in_new_zealand_w.html) 

All of the rest of the delegation left Christchurch shortly before the quake hit except for Mr Manning who stayed behind, and then after the quake hit he assisted with directing the emergency response.  Exactly the same thing happened with FEMA delegates with the Haiti earthquake.  In Haiti , the FEMA delegates just happened to be there at the time conducting training exercises for responding to major earthquakes.

4. Recently retired US Admiral Thad Allen just happened to be in Christchurch at the time of the earthquake.  Admiral Allen directed the US federal response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and the Gulf Oil disaster. (http://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/admiral-thad-allen-in-christchurch-at-time-of-earthquake/)

5. 116 members of the Singapore army just happened to be in Christchurch at the time for training exercises and were also able to assist with the response operation

6.  Venezuela President, Hugo Chavez stated on Fox News shortly after the Haiti earthquake in 2010 that ‘the United States apparently possesses an earthquake weapon that set off the catastrophic quake in Haiti’ and also said that ‘the Haiti quake was caused by a US test of an experimental shockwave system that can also create weather anomalies which cause floods, droughts, and hurricanes (our Australian and Queensland cousins may be interested in that last piece of information)

7.  Following the Haiti earthquake, Venezuelan news also reported ‘the US government’s HAARP program may also be to blame for the 7.8 earthquake in China in 2008’, and said ‘the cataclysmic ruin in Haiti was only a test run for a much bigger game: the coming showdown with Iran’

Conclusions

Has the US military been carrying out tests on a secret new weapon system using huge electromagnetic pulses from HAARP installations?  The Christchurch earthquake bears some very strange and remarkable similarities to other recent major earthquakes that have also been suspected of HAARP activity.  There is significant evidence that atmospheric conditions in the Christchurch area had been ‘primed’ for HAARP activity, that multiple HAARP installations in the US were simultaneously activated to a high level just prior to the Christchurch earthquake, and that Christchurch seemed to be the focal point of a ‘global quake’ around that time.  Why were all those US delegates, US emergency response officials, and other international personnel in Christchurch at the time?  And why did 9 members of US Congress suddenly leave Christchurch and relocate to Wellington just 2.5 hours before the quake hit even though their meeting wasn’t due to finish until that evening, but they left behind the Deputy Administrator of the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency and another high level US federal emergency response official who were then subsequently and conveniently on hand to assist with the emergency response (just as in Haiti)?  Did they know something was coming and were they preparing for something?

Was the Christchurch earthquake a man made event as part of a US weapons testing programme or some other unknown purpose? And if so, why Christchurch?

We must remain objective about all this but there are serious questions raised here and the victims of Christchurch and all the people of NZ deserve these questions to be looked at fully.

HAARP CHART FOR NEW ZEALAND QUAKE

and an article by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky on the subject

H.A.A.R.P.

It's not only greenhouse gas emissions: Washington's new world order weapons have the ability to trigger climate change.

By Michel Chossudovsky - Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa and TFF associate, author of The Globalization of Poverty, second edition, Common Courage Press

From the Wilderness,

The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World's climate can now be

modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal weapons." Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World's climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star Wars") Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes.

HAARP IS A MASS DESTRUCTIVE WEAPON - NOT PART OF ANY NEGOTIATIONS

From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of "environmental warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases.

Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of "weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)" as relevant to an understanding of climate change.

The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American business lobbies has centered on Washington's outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World's climate are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington's strategic and defense objectives.

"WEATHER WARFARE"

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."(2)

Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book "Between Two Ages" that:

"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised... Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. "

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of "unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. He refers to "weather war," indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already "mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s." (3) These technologies make it "possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves]." (4)

A simulation study of future defense "scenarios" commissioned for the US Air Force calls for: 

"US aerospace forces to 'own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications." From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. (5)

THE HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURAL RESEARCH PROGRAM - HAARP

The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska-jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy-is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating "controlled local modifications of the ionosphere".

Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich-actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP-describes HAARP as: "A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere (upper layer of the atmosphere) by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything-living and dead." (6)

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as "a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet." (7)

MISLEADING PUBLIC OPINION

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." (8) Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of "induced ionospheric modifications" as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.(9)

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated weapons' system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences: "It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer. (10)

In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses: "HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays. Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people's brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out. (11).

More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World's electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of "electronic weapons" which US military researchers consider a "gentler and kinder warfare". (12)

WEAPONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war. The use of HAARP-if it were to be applied-could have potentially devastating impacts on the World's climate.

Responding to US economic and strategic interests, it could be used to selectively modify climate in different parts of the World resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and ecological systems. It is also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring systems on weather changes. NASA and the Department of Defense's National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) are working on "imagery for studies of flooding, erosion, land-slide hazards, earthquakes, ecological zones, weather forecasts, and climate change" with data relayed from satellites. (13)

POLICY INERTIA OF THE UNITED NATIONS

According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro:

"States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction." (14).

It is also worth recalling that an international Convention ratified by the UN General Assembly in 1997 bans "military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects." (15) Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories to the Convention. The Convention defines "environmental modification techniques" as referring to any technique for changing-through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes-the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space." (16) Why then did the UN-disregarding the 1977 ENMOD Convention as well as its own charter-decide to exclude from its agenda climatic changes resulting from military programs?

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACKNOWLEDGES IMPACT OF HAARP

In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj. Britt Theorin-Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate--, the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program.(17) The Committee's "Motion for Resolution" submitted to the European Parliament: "Considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to give evidence to the public hearing into the environmental and public risks [of&] the HAARP program." (18.)

The Committee's request to draw up a "Green Paper" on "the environmental impacts of military activities", however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into "the links between environment and defense". (19) Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

FULLY OPERATIONAL

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an "unfriendly nation" or "rogue state" with a view to destabilizing its national economy. Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of New World Order policies including market deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank "economic medicine" imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds on farmers throughout the World.

It is important to understand the linkage between the economic, strategic and military processes of the New World Order. In the above context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other "non-lethal weapons" on climate change.

NOTES

1. The latter calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. See Background of Kyoto Protocol at

http://www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html.

2. The Times, London, 23 November 2000.

3. Intelligence Newsletter, December 16, 1999.

4. Ibid.

5. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ (emphasis added).

6. Nicholas Begich and Jeane Manning, The Military's Pandora's Box, Earthpulse Press,

http://www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/earthlight.html. See also the HAARP home page at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/).

7. See Briarpatch, January, 2000. (emphasis added).

8. Quoted in Begich and Manning, op cit.

9. Air University, op cit.

10. Rosalie Bertell, Background of the HAARP Program, 5 November, 1996,

http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/weapons.htm

11. Begich and Manning, op cit.

12. Don Herskovitz, Killing Them Softly, Journal of Electronic Defense, August 1993. (emphasis added). According to Herskovitz, "electronic warfare" is defined by the US Department of Defense as "military action involving the use of electromagnetic energyƒ" The Journal of Electronic Defense at http://www.jedefense.com/ has published a range

of articles on the application of electronic and electromagnetic military technologies.

13. Military Space, 6 December, 1999.

14. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York,

1992. See complete text at http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/conv_002.html, (emphasis

added).

15. See Associated Press, 18 May 1977.

16. Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27.

17. European Report, 7 February 1998.

18. European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs,

Security and Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99,

14 January 1999.

19. EU Lacks Jurisdiction to Trace Links Between Environment and Defense, European Report, 3 February 1999.

Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, November, 2000.

All rights reserved.