The
3rd day of government shutdown
It
is the case of two competing narratives which have nothing to do with
other. From what I have seen one side tells many lies; the other is
incapable of speaking the truth.
Both
sides are blaming each other.
On
one side we have the liberal media (here dutifully and totally
uncritically represented by Radio NZ)
On the other we have the other extreme, represented here by Alex Jones.
This
article from the normally bipartisan the Hill, seems
to be putting the blame on the Democrats.
As
usual while the politicians bicker (while agreeing on things like
surveillance and war) the only losers are the American people
Democrats
shut government down, but they're still struggling to explain why
the
Hill ,
21
January, 2018
While
they may not be able to admit it publicly (or even to themselves),
it’s clear that the Democrats have deliberately manufactured a
government shutdown. Banking on a complicit media and a confused
electorate, they have now fully embraced a political tactic they
decried for eight years under President Obama.
Charges
that this shutdown is the fault of Republicans, or that Democrats
haven’t been part of the negotiations leading to the spending bill
they rejected, are not true. Instead what’s obvious is that
Democrats methodically engineered a situation where the government
could shut down over the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
(DACA) program.
Here
are the steps they employed to get us here.
Step
one: Democrats have yet to agree to a long-term spending deal that
would allow Congress to appropriate funds on an annual basis instead
of passing short-term continuing resolutions. This fiscal year began
three and half months ago, and under ordinary circumstances the
funding question would have been resolved long ago, and the
opportunity to shut down the government wouldn’t even exist.
However,
Democrats blocked a necessary increase in Pentagon funding in a naked
attempt to leverage national security to win more funding for
domestic programs. For that reason, Congress passed three short-term
bills. Democrats blocked passage of the fourth.
Step
two: Democrats rejected numerous offers to get just want they want,
which is a permanent solution for DACA. While DACA is not in any way
related to government spending, the Democrats have taken spending
hostage in an attempt to force Republicans to deal on DACA.
There’s
just one problem: Republicans are perfectly willing to deal on DACA.
Trump and even the most conservative Republican leaders have proposed
a true compromise and even written legislation that reflects it.
Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Michael McCaul (R-Texas) proposed
legislation that grants permanent amnesty to DACA recipients, in
addition to common-sense border security and enforcement provisions.
Having rejected this proposal, Democrats are claiming they’ll block
government funding until a more favorable compromise to them emerges.
Step
three: The Democrats distracted from the reality of the negotiations
by creating a media circus around a comment that President Trump
allegedly made during a private meeting — a comment the president
denies.
Step
four: The Democrats have used the alleged comment to confuse people,
charging that the president is a racist rather admitting the truth,
which is that he sincerely wants a DACA deal. Otherwise, their
manufactured shutdown wouldn’t make any sense at all in the face of
a president who wants to give them what they want.
Step
five: Having refused a long-term deal (step one), the Democrats then
turned to refusing a short-term stopgap. This is the step that really
brings the shutdown into play. The House proposed and passed a
four-week continuing resolution that would have kept the government
running while the two parties continued to hash out DACA and the
long-term spending bill. Instead, Democrats rejected that offer of
more time and instead opted to all discretionary spending lapse.
Step
six: Democrats have cranked up the blame machine. Republicans have
majorities in the House and in the Senate. This is a fact that
Democrats believe makes them blameless in the Senate, but anyone who
buys this line is ignorant of the Senate’s rules. Any spending bill
must have 60 votes to pass the Senate. That means that while
Republicans enjoy the majority, they don’t control the outcome by
themselves.
Almost
every Republican senator is ready to support a short-term spending
bill. It is only the Democrat senators that are blocking its passage.
If Republicans really did “control” the Senate, as Democrats are
saying, the government would have remained open.
As
has been the case in each and every policy debate so far, compromise
between the parties has been elusive. A quick review of the facts
reveals exactly why. Democrats, exerting the leverage they have over
what can pass the Senate, will block any compromise. While feigning
interest in a compromise, they continue to block any proposal that
doesn’t give them exactly what they want and only what they want.
In
short order, we’ll all find out whether the American people are
clued in to this brand of brinksmanship.
Thomas
Binion is the director of Congressional and Executive Branch
Relations at The Heritage Foundation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.