PCR: "The Witch Hunt For Donald Trump Surpasses Salem"
3
August, 2017
We
should be scared to death that Sally Q. Yates served as a prosecutor
in the Justice (sic) Department for 27 years. In the
New York Times, Sally
takes high umbrage to Trump’s criticism of his attorney general,
Sessions, and blows Trump’s disappointment with Sessions into an
attack by Trump on the rule of law.
Sally
has it backwards. The rule of law is being attacked by the
appointment of a special prosecutor to find something on Trump in the
absence of any evidence of a crime.
In 1940 US attorney general Robert Jackson warned federal prosecutors against “picking the man and then putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him.
It is in this realm - in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense - that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies.
It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views or being personally obnoxious to, or in the way of, the prosecutor himself.”
Robert
Jackson has given a perfect description of what is happening to
President Trump at the hands of special prosecutor Robert
Mueller. Trump
is vastly unpopular with the ruling establishment, with the
Democrats, with the military/security complex and their bought and
paid for Senators, and with the media for proving wrong all the smart
people’s prediction that Hillary would win the election in a
landslide.
From
day one this cabal has been out to get Trump, and they have given the
task of framing up Trump to Mueller. An
honest man would not have accepted the job of chief witch-hunter,
which is what Mueller’s job is.
The
breathless hype of a nonexistent “Russian collusion” has been the
lead news story for months despite the fact that no one, not the CIA,
not the NSA, not the FBI, not the Director of National Intelligence,
can find a scrap of evidence. In
desperation, three of the seventeen US intelligence agencies picked a
small handful of employees thought to lack integrity and produced an
unverified report, absent of any evidence, that the hand-picked
handful thought that there might have been a collusion. On the basis
of what evidence they do not say.
That
nothing more substantial than this led to a special prosecutor shows
how totally corrupt justice in America is.
Furthermore
the baseless charge itself is an absurdity. There is no law against
an incoming administration conversing with other governments. Indeed,
Trump, Flynn, and whomever should be given medals for quickly moving
to smooth Russian feathers ruffled by the reckless Bush and Obama
regimes. What good for anyone can come from ceaselessly provoking a
nuclear Russian bear?
The
new Russian sanctions bill passed by Congress is an act of reckless
idiocy. It
was done without consulting Europe which will bear the cost of the
bill and might reject it, thus sending shock waves through the
fragile American empire.
Congress’
thoughtless bill is a violation of the separation of powers. Foreign
policy is the executive branch’s arena. The feckless Obama put the
sanctions on. Obviously, if a president can put sanctions on, a
president can take sanctions off.
Trump
should take his case to the American people, not via Twitter, but
with a major speech. Fox
News and Alex Jones, either of which has a larger audience than CNN
and the New York Times, would broadcast Trump’s speech. Trump
should make the case that Congress is over-reaching its
constitutional authority and also preventing a reduction in dangerous
tensions between nuclear powers. Trump should ask the American people
forthright if they want to be driven into war with Russia by
gratuitous provocation after provocation.
Because
of the powers that Bush and Obama thoughtlessly gave the presidency,
Trump can declare a national emergency, cancel Congress, and arrest
whomever he wishes. Of course, the presstitute media would do
everything possible to sway the people and the US military against
the state of emergency, but if there were a real “Russian
collusion,” Trump would have Putin initiate a major crisis that
would bring the people and the military to Trump’s side. That no
such thing will happen is total proof that there is no “Russian
collusion.”
Even
the Washington Post, an
initiator and leader of the breathless “Russian collusion” lie
has now published an article, “The quest to Prove Collusion is
Crumbling,” that concludes that the entire orchestration is a
hoax.
As
the Washington Post article says, “the
story that never was is not happening.”
So
the great “superpower America,” the “exceptional, indispensable
country,” has wasted 7 months of a new presidency in a hoax when it
could have been repairing the relations with Russia and China that
were seriously damaged by the criminal Bush and Obama regimes. What
are the utter fools that comprise the American Establishment
thinking? Why do the morons want high tensions with the two powers
that can remove the United States and its impotent European and
British vassals from the face of the earth in a few minutes? Who
gains from this? What is wrong with the American people that they
cannot understand that they are being driven to their destruction?
Insouciant America is clearly not a sufficiently strong term.
To
come back to the ridiculous Sally Q. Yates, clearly Sally is the
embodiment of the Insouciant American.She
says she spent 27 years as a Justice (sic) Department prosecutor.
Yet, she is able to write this utter nonsense:
“I know from first
hand experience how seriously the career prosecutors and agents take
their responsibility to make fair and impartial decisions based
solely on the facts and the law and nothing else”
Where
was Sally Q. Yates when US attorney Rudy Giuliani used the
presstitute media to frame up Michael Milken and Leona Helmsley?
Giuliani never had any valid indictment against Milken but used the
media and FBI harassment of Milken’s relatives to force Milken into
a plea bargain and then had Milken double-crossed by the bimbo judge,
who was denied her reward to the Supreme Court because it came to
light that she illegally employed illegal aliens.
Today,
thanks to the corrupt American media, 99.9% of people who remember
the Milken case think that Milken was convicted of insider trading, a
charge for which no evidence was ever presented and which was totally
absent from the coerced plea bargain that the media helped Giuliani
secure.
As
best I remember my investigation of the Helmsley case, Rudy dropped
charges against a corrupt accountant in exchange for false testimony
against Helmsley. As I remember, both Judge Robert Bork and Alan
Dershowitz, attorneys in the case, told me that the charge of tax
evasion against Helmsley was preposterous. The Helmsley hotels were
fully depreciated and were surviving by guest rentals alone. If the
Helmsleys had wanted to reduce their income tax, all they needed to
do was to sell their existing depreciated holdings and purchase other
hotels in order to crank up the depreciation that reduces income tax.
Whatever
Justice (sic) Department case you look at, it stinks to high heaven.
It is extremely difficult to find any justice in America.
But
Sally is certain that President Trump’s criticism of his weak AG
means the end of the rule of law in the US.
As
many on the left would say, the US has never had a rule of law. It
has a rule of power. How else do we explain the enormous war crimes
of the Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes, and the war crimes to come
from the Trump or successor Pence regime, that never will be tried at
Nuremberg?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.