North Korea – Killer Sanctions Imposed by the Foremost Institution of Peace and Justice – the UN Security Council
by Peter
Koenig
9
August, 2017
As
reported by CNN, “The
United Nations Security Council on Saturday [5 August 2017] passed a
resolution imposing new sanctions on North Korea for its continued
intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) testing and violations of
UN resolutions.
With
15 votes in favor, Resolution 2371 was passed unanimously.
The
resolution targets North Korea’s primary exports, including coal,
iron, iron ore, lead, lead ore and seafood. The sanctions also target
other revenue streams, such as banks and joint ventures with foreign
companies.”
Resolution
2371 was imposed – by whom else? – the United States of America,
the chief aggressor of the universe; the exceptional rogue
nation that is never punished, never sanctioned by the very Peace
Body, the UN Security Council (UNSC), for the millions of war deaths
and drone murders caused by illicit and hegemonic wars, by proxies or
by its own killing machine around the globe within the last 70 years
– or more.
This
anti-DPRK Resolution was unanimously approved by all 15 members of
the UNSC, including North Korea’s only allies, China and Russia.
They may have had their own strategic and selfish reasons for their
lack of solidarity, for not vetoing the Resolution and instead
proposing diplomatic measures – or else. Diplomatic measures which
might have called to reason Washington and the Pentagon hawks, as
well as stopped Trump’s monstrous warmongering, shouting nuclear
threats from his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., “They
will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.” Russia
and China could have proposed a counter Resolution seeking dialogue
and forcing Washington to stop its belligerence. – They didn’t.
And that’s sad.
It
is an outright shame to what extent literally the entire world is
bending over backwards to please Washington – and, as always, its
dark and deep state handlers that pull the strings on the White House
puppets. Have we become a world of vassals to a dying empire?
The
same military aggressors led by Washington, more than 60 years ago
have destroyed North Korea to rubble, decimating its then population
of 10 million by a third. The US has never allowed the signing of a
Peace Agreement. Instead the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
(DPRK) under a shaky armistice pact was and is permanently threatened
by Washington’s huge military bases in South Korea and Japan with
fleets of war planes and vessels. The DPRK’s airspace is frequently
invaded by US bombers; military maneuvers by the US armed forces with
Japan and South Korea are repeated intimidations on the peaceful
lives of the North Korean people. A 250 km long strictly enforced
Military Demarcation Line at the 38th parallel north is keeping
Korean families separated for more than three generation.
What
the Kim-Jong-un regime is showing the world is nothing more than its
readiness to defend the DPRK’s achievements of a marvelously
rebuilt country with full social benefits of free education and
health services for more than 25 million people. The nuclear
deterrent is no danger to anyone, not Japan, not its Southern
brother, and least the United States. And Trump knows damn well. His
‘fire
and fury’boasting
is nothing more than sabre rattling, showmanship, as it pertains to a
golfing multi-billionaire psychopath, who is dreaming of running a
thanks-goodness faltering empire. He wouldn’t dare touching North
Korea, because then, he would face the fire
and fury of
DPRK’s allies, Russia and China, despite their unfortunate UNSC
vote.
The
UN sanctions, if observed, would reduce North Korea’s annual export
earnings by a third, i.e. by an estimated US$ 1 billion. It might
plunge the country, already isolated by the west’s previous
sanctions into extreme hardship and famine. Although it is unlikely
that China, with whom North Korea deals for 90% of its external
trade, would adhere to such sanctions, it is nevertheless an unfair
threat.
—–
—–
Let’s
look for a moment at the legality of the UN Sanctions Resolution in a
broader context – in a context that the world’s populace has
either never known or easily forgets.
Chapter
VII of the United Nations Charter addresses Actions
with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts
of Aggression.
These
actions are governed by specifically Articles 39, 40, 41 and 42 of
Chapter VII:
Article 39
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Article 40
In order to prevent an aggravation of the situation, the Security Council may, before making the recommendations or deciding upon the measures provided for in Article 39, call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems necessary or desirable. Such provisional measures shall be without prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned. The Security Council shall duly take account of failure to comply with such provisional measures.
Article 41
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Article 42
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
Bilaterally
imposed economic sanctions, the main staple of the United States
slapped around the globe at will and at any nation that doesn’t
lick her boots, are totally illegal and in breach of any
international law.
The
legality of UN imposed economic sanctions is highly questionable in
most cases, and particularly in the case of North Korea, as they may
affect Human
Rights, or more specifically the civilian’s economic, social and
cultural rights (ESCR), as adverse collateral effects may lead to a
humanitarian emergency, i.e. the shortage of certain goods and
services essential for the guarantee of basic standards of
living(Gebs,
Robin. “Humanitarian Safeguards in Economic Sanctions Regimes: A
Call for Automatic Suspension Clauses, Periodic Monitoring, and
Follow-Up Assessment of Long-Term Effects”. The Harvard Human
Rights Journal 18 (2005), p. 173).
In
the case of North Korea, such sanctions are outright farcical, if not
illegal, since the main aggressor is not and has never been the DPRK,
but the United States.
It
would, however, never occur to any nation on this lovely planet to
introduce a sanctions regime on the US of A through the foremost
Peace and Security body of the United Nations. – And why not? –
Because they are all afraid of US retaliations. Though, Russia and
China and the block of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
that already comprises half of the world’s population and controls
one third of the globes economic output – and is clearly in the
process of fully detaching themselves from the US-dollar hegemony –
they should no longer fear retaliations – should they?
It
is mind-boggling, how the world, the league of nation as it were, has
been brainwashed to the core accepting almost without exceptions and
questions Washington’s atrocities, crimes on humanity,
indiscriminate killings of tens of millions of people around the
world, the most vicious human rights abuse recent history has ever
known, without blinking an eye. At the same time, this ‘solidary’
league of nations is ready to strangle a small brave nation, North
Korea, that is merely testing its capacity of self-defense facing
constant illegal threats from the world’s aggressor in-chief, the
United States of America.
Peter
Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former
World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the
fields of environment and water resources. He lectures at
universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly
for Global Research, ICH, RT, Sputnik, PressTV, The 4th Media
(China), TeleSUR, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet
sites. He is the author of Implosion
– An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and
Corporate Greed –
fiction
based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the
globe. He is also a co-author of The
World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.