My apologies. I have been struggling with getting my partial recording from Guy McPherson's conversation with Gary Null uploaded all morning. All I could come up with is the following which captures MOST of the conversation.
I shall upload the entire conversation when it becomes available.
I shall upload the entire conversation when it becomes available.
FEMA Contractor Predicts 'Social Unrest' Caused by 395% Food Price Spikes
A FEMA contract predicts “social unrest” caused by a global food crisis.
Nafeez Ahmed
27
June, 2016
The
US national security industry is planning for the impact of an
unprecedented global food crisis lasting as long as a decade,
according to reports by a government contractor.
The studies published
by CNA Corporation in December 2015, unreported until now, describe a
detailed simulation of a protracted global food crisis from 2020 to
2030.
The
simulation, titled 'Food Chain Reaction', was a desktop gaming
exercise involving the participation of 65 officials from the US,
Europe, Africa, India, Brazil, and key multilateral and
intergovernmental institutions.
The scenario for
the 'Food Chain Reaction' simulation was created by experts brought
in from the State Department, the World Bank, and agribusiness giant
Cargill, along with independent specialists. CNA Corp's Institute for
Public Research, which ran the simulation, primarily provides
scientific research services for the Department of Homeland Security
and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Held
from November 9-10 in 2015, the "game" attempted to
simulate a plausible global food crisis triggered by "food price
and supply swings amidst burgeoning population growth, rapid
urbanization, severe weather events, and social unrest."
By
2024, the scenario saw global food prices spike by as much as 395
percent due to prolonged crop failures in key food basket regions,
driven largely by climate change, oil price spikes, and confused
responses from the international community.
"Disruptions
affected developed and developing countries alike, creating political
and economic instability, and contributing to social unrest in
certain areas," the project's technical
report states.
The
report notes that at the end of the simulation, the teams highlighted
the important role of "extreme weather events" and "food
insecurity" in exacerbating "instances of significant
internal and external migration and social unrest." These, in
turn, greatly "contribute to conflict."
National security
Although
the scenario was not produced as a forecast, it was designed to
provide a plausible framework to test the resilience of the national
security system from the perspective of the US government, private
industry, and civil society.
CNA
Corporation is a government contractor established in 1942 to provide
scientific research for the US Navy and Marine Corps. Its CEO, Dr.
Katherine A. W. McGrady, is a scientific analyst to the US military's
Chief of Naval Operations and the Vice Chief of Naval Operations.
Four
different organisations commissioned CNA Corp to conduct the
exercise: the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the Center for American
Progress, giant food corporation Cargill, which controls a quarter of
US grain exports, and Mars Inc., the global sweet manufacturer.
One
outcome was a panel hosted on Tuesday by the Center for American
Progress on 'The National Security implications of Climate Change and
Food Security', featuring Nancy Stetson, the US State Department's
Special Representative for Global Food Security.
From crop failure to system failure
The
game begins in 2020 with a reasonably healthy global economy and oil
prices that have now rebounded to $75 a barrel. Food prices climb
steadily due to "weather-related disruptions to agricultural
production," affecting South and Southeast Asia, Australia, and
North America. Global crop production falls 1 percent short of
expectations leading to decreases in stock and further modest price
increases.
Part
of that optimistic scenario involves fortuitously massive Band
Aid-style worldwide donations to the UN's World Food Programme
Things
get really rough after 2023 due to serious droughts and heatwaves in
China, India, Russia, and Ukraine, coinciding with oil prices that
rapidly increase to above $100 a barrel.
By
2024, heat and drought hit the European Union, Russia, and Ukraine,
while subsiding elsewhere, triggering a food price spike "reaching
395 percent of long-term averages," and a global economic
slowdown.
By
2027, these conditions begin to calm only because an economic slump
has diminished demand, while high prices stimulate food production. A
respite from weather-related disruptions allows food stocks to be
re-built, and prices then come down gradually.
The
game closes with an optimistic scenario of food prices dropping from
395 to 141 percent of long-term averages and a recovering global
economy.
Part
of that optimistic scenario involves fortuitously massive Band
Aid-style worldwide donations to the UN's World Food Programme, which
thankfully "leave the world well prepared to handle the
catastrophe in areas humanitarian groups can reach."
Stranger
things have certainly happened. This is not, though, the kind of
thing one expects a crack team of handpicked food crisis planners to
be hinging their hopes on.
On
the other hand, some simulations that have explored business-as-usual
scenarios for a global food crisis—such as a
complex model created
by Anglia Ruskin University's Global Sustainability Institute with
funding from the British Foreign Office—forecast that current
trends could result in a wholesale collapse of industrial
civilization.
The
role of Cargill and Mars Inc. in sponsoring the exercise could
explain why the project failed to address the deep-seated problems of
the prevailing industrial food system. Let's just hope that CNA
Corporation's main backer—the US government—doesn't simply wait
for a climate-driven food crisis to kick in. That would leave FEMA
little choice but to invoke draconian emergency measures to maintain
national order amidst hunger and anger.
Here is Guy McPherson talking about the importance of human habitat a few weeks ago
What
if several of the world’s biggest food crops failed at the same
time?
5
June, 2017
What
if several of the world’s biggest food crops failed at the same
time?
June
5, 2017 11.44am AEST
Less
than one-quarter of Earth’s total cropland produces nearly
three-quarters of the staple crops that feed the world’s population
– especially corn, wheat and rice, the most important cereal crops.
These areas are our planet’s major breadbaskets.
Historically,
when a crop failed in one of these breadbaskets, only nearby areas
had to contend with shortages and rising prices. Now, however, major
crops are traded on global markets, which means that production
failures can have far-reaching impacts. Moreover, climate change is
expected to generate heat waves and drought that could cause crop
losses in most of the world’s breadbaskets. Indeed, failures could
occur simultaneously in several of these key regions.
Top
10 grain-producing countries (5-year average, 2012/2013 –
2016/2017), based on 5-year USDA PS&D data. Brian Barker,
University of Maryland, Author provided
Pardee
Center postdoctoral scholar John Patrick Connors and I are using
mathematical models to study the potential environmental and economic
impacts of failures in multiple breadbaskets around the world. It is
already clear from our preliminary work that this is a real,
near-term threat.
The
good news is that not all of these regions respond in the same way to
shocks in other places in the world. Some could bring new land into
production quickly, easing stresses caused by crop failures
elsewhere. But in order to make global food systems more robust, we
need to know more about the most damaging consequences of multiple
breadbasket failures.
A
vulnerable system
In
the past several decades, many of the world’s major breadbaskets
have experienced shocks – events that caused large, rapid drops in
food production. For example, regional droughts and heat waves in the
Ukraine and Russia in 2007 and then again in 2009 damaged wheat crops
and caused global wheat prices to spike by substantial amounts in
both years. In 2012 heat and drought in the United States slashed
national corn, soybean and other crop yields by up to 27 percent. And
yields of important food crops are low and stagnating in many
countries due to factors including plant diseases, poor soil quality,
poor management practices and damage from air pollution.
At
the same time, many experts assert that world food production may
have to double by 2050 to feed a growing population and satisfy
rising demand for meat, poultry and dairy products in developing
countries. Global agricultural production has risen over the past 50
years, largely fueled by improvements in plant breeding and more
intensive use of inputs, such as mechanized equipment, fertilizers
and pesticides. This trend has eased pressure to bring new land into
production. But it has limits, especially in the developing world,
where the need to produce more food has been a main driver of
deforestation in recent decades
It
is clear that rising demand, growing international trade in
agricultural products, and the potential for weather-, climate- and
soil-related shocks are making the world food production system less
resilient. Global agricultural trade can mean that price spikes in
one region, if they are severe enough, can be felt broadly in other
regions. Minor shocks, on the other hand, could be lessened by trade
and by using grain reserves.
There
is increasing
evidence that
in very poor countries, food price increases and shortages can lead
to civil unrest and worsen other social and political stresses. And
more wealthy countries are not immune, given the concentration of
world food production and the global nature of trade. For example,
the Russian/Ukrainian heat wave referenced above led to spikes in
food prices, not just in the price of wheat. However, more wealthy
countries also typically have more ability to buffer price shocks by
either using grain reserves or increasing trade.
Modeling potential shocks
How
can we understand this risk and its potential consequences for both
rich and poor nations? Programs already exist to provide
early warning of potential famines in
the world’s poorest countries, many of which already depend heavily
on food aid. There also are programs in wealthier nations that
monitor food prices and provide early
warnings of price spikes.
But
these programs focus mainly on regional risks, and often are not
located in major food production areas. Very little work has been
done to analyze risks of simultaneous shocks in several of the
world’s breadbaskets.
We
want to understand the impacts that shock events could have if they
occur in the real world so that we can identify possible contingency
plans for the largest-impact events. In order to do that, we have
used an integrated assessment model, the Global
Change Assessment Model,
which was developed by the U.S. Department of Energy and is freely
available to users around the world. Integrated assessment models
have been designed specifically to simulate the interactions among
Earth’s energy, economic and land use systems.
We
have developed scenarios in which small shocks (10 percent crop loss)
and large shocks (50 percent crop loss), averaged over five years,
are applied to corn, wheat or rice in their major production regions,
and then to all the combinations of one, two or all three crops in
one, two or the top three production regions.
"Flooding
in October 2009 caused heavy damage to rice farms in
Indonesia. NR-PH001
World Bank/Flickr, CC
BY-NC-ND
Unsurprisingly,
our results to date suggest that large shocks have larger effects
than smaller shocks, as measured in subsequent changes in land use,
the total amount of land dedicated to agriculture and food prices.
But more interestingly, not all breadbasket regions respond to shocks
in the same way.
Some
of these areas are quite unresponsive to shocks occurring elsewhere
in the world. For example, the total amount of land in agricultural
production in South Asia changes relatively little due to shocks
elsewhere in the world, largely because most of the arable land is
already in use.
But
other regions are extremely responsive. Notably, Brazil has the
ability to bring a lot of new land into production if large shocks
occur elsewhere, because it still has a significant amount of
potentially arable land that is not currently being farmed. However,
this land currently is mostly forest, so clearing it for agriculture
would add significantly to atmospheric concentrations of carbon
dioxide, and thus to global climate change.
Mapping risks
The
Pardee Center has published a research
agenda that
discusses what we still need to know about these risks. Key questions
include understanding the full distribution of risks, whether
increased international trade can ameliorate risk and where the most
responsive and the most sensitive regions are.
Ultimately,
understanding and preparing for multiple breadbasket failures will
require input from climate scientists, agronomists, ecologists,
remote sensing experts, economists, political scientists and
decision-makers. Mounting such an effort will be challenging, but the
costs of failing to do it could be devastating
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.