Hersh: Trump Knew ‘Assad Sarin Attack’ Story Was Fairy Tale – But Launched Cruise Missile Strike Anyway
27
June, 2017
Consortium
News Exclusive: The
mainstream media is so hostile to challenges to its groupthinks that
famed journalist Seymour Hersh had to take his take-down of President
Trump’s April 6 attack on Syria to Germany, says ex-CIA analyst Ray
McGovern…
Ray McGovern
Legendary
investigative reporter Seymour Hersh is challenging the Trump
administration’s version of events surrounding the April 4
“chemical weapons attack” on the northern Syrian town of Khan
Sheikhoun – though Hersh had to find a publisher in Germany to get
his information out.
In
the Sunday edition of Die
Welt,
Hersh reports that
his national security sources offered a distinctly different account,
revealing President Trump rashly deciding to launch 59 Tomahawk
missiles against a Syrian airbase on April 6 despite the absence of
intelligence supporting his conclusion that the Syrian military was
guilty.
Hersh
draws on the kind of inside sources from whom he has earned
longstanding trust to dispute that there ever was a “chemical
weapons attack” and to assert that Trump was told that no evidence
existed against the Syrian government but ordered “his generals”
to “retaliate” anyway.
Marine
General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and
former Marine General, now Defense Secretary James “Mad-Dog”
Mattis ordered the attacks apparently knowing that the reason given
was what one of Hersh’s sources called a “fairy tale.”
They
then left it to Trump’s national security adviser Army General H.
R. McMaster to further the deceit with the help of a compliant
mainstream media, which broke from its current tradition of
distrusting whatever Trump says in favor of its older tradition of
favoring “regime change” in Syria and trusting pretty much
whatever the “rebels” claim.
According
to Hersh’s sources, the normal “deconfliction” process was
followed before the April 4 strike. In such procedures, U.S. and
Russian officers supply one another with advance details of
airstrikes, such as target coordinates, to avoid accidental
confrontations among the warplanes crisscrossing Syria.
Russia
and Syrian Air Force officers gave details of the flight path to and
from Khan Sheikhoun in English, Hersh reported. The target was a
two-story cinderblock building in which senior leaders –
“high-value targets” – of the two jihadist groups controlling
the town were about to hold a meeting. Because of the perceived
importance of the mission, the Russians took the unusual step of
giving the Syrian air force a GPS-guided bomb to do the job, but the
explosives were conventional, not chemical, Hersh reported.
The
meeting place was on the floor above the basement of the building,
where a source whom Hersh described as “a senior adviser to the
U.S. intelligence community,” told Hersh: “The basement was
used as storage for rockets, weapons, and ammunition … and also
chlorine-based decontaminates for cleansing the bodies of the dead
before burial.”
A
Bomb Damage Assessment
Hersh
describes what happened when the building was struck on the morning
of April 4: “A Bomb Damage Assessment by the U.S. military later
determined that the heat and force of the 500-pound Syrian bomb
triggered a series of secondary explosions that could have generated
a huge toxic cloud that began to spread over the town, formed by the
release of fertilizers, disinfectants, and other goods stored in the
basement, its effect magnified by the dense morning air, which
trapped the fumes close to the ground.
“According
to intelligence estimates, the strike itself killed up to four
jihadist leaders and an unknown number of drivers and security
aides. There is no confirmed count of the number of civilians
killed by the poisonous gases that were released by the secondary
explosions, although opposition activists reported that there were
more than 80 dead, and outlets such as CNN have put the figure as
high as 92.”
Due
to the fog of war, which is made denser by the fact that jihadists
associated with Al Qaeda control the area, many of the details
of the incident were unclear on that day and remain so still. No
independent on-the-ground investigation has taken place.
But
there were other reasons to doubt Syrian guilt, including the
implausibility of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad choosing that time
– while his forces were making dramatic strides in finally
defeating the jihadists and immediately after the Trump
administration had indicated it had reversed President Obama’s
“regime change” policy in Syria – to launch a sarin attack,
which was sure to outrage the world and likely draw U.S. retaliation.
However,
logic was brushed aside after local “activists,” including some
closely tied to the jihadists, quickly uploaded all manner of images
onto social media, showing dead and dying children and other victims
said to be suffering from sarin nerve gas. Inconsistencies were
brushed aside – such as the “eyewitness” who insisted, “We
could smell it from 500 meters away” when sarin is odorless.
Potent
Images
Still,
whether credible or not, these social-media images had a potent
propaganda effect. Hersh writes that within hours of watching the
gruesome photos on TV – and before he had received any U.S.
intelligence corroboration – Trump told his national security aides
to plan retaliation against Syria. According to Hersh, it was an
evidence-free decision, except for what Trump had seen on the TV
shows.
Hersh
quotes one U.S. officer who, upon learning of the White House
decision to “retaliate” against Syria, remarked: “We KNOW that
there was no chemical attack … the Russians are furious –
claiming we have the real intel and know the truth…”…
Continue
this story at Consortium News
Seymour
Hersh interviewed
Hersh:
Trump Ignored Intel Before Bombing Syria
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.