So says Reuters
"Deadly protests rocked Venezuela on Sunday as voters broadly boycotted an election for a constitutional super-body that unpopular leftist President Nicolas Maduro vowed would begin a "new era of combat" in the crisis-stricken nation."
Abby Martin provides some background into the Constituent Assembly, so hated by the power-that-be and a compliant media. What is clear is that this an example of direct democracy - something that has always been reviled by the elites of America, especially in South America.
The Americans would like a repeat of Chile in 1973 and not of the failed coup against Chavez.
To me this looks like one of the few places in the world that is trying to implement real democracy.
Abby
Martin addresses the criticisms with Head of the Presidential
Commission
to oversee the Constituent Assembly process, Elias Jaua, speaks to
supporters and participants of the Assembly, interviews historian
Chris Gilbert and explains what is at stake in Venezuela if the
social programs instated under Chavez are terminated by the
opposition.
Propaganda from Telesur
Propaganda from Telesur
What
Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela's Constituent Assembly
30
July, 2017
Venezuelans
voted Sunday for representatives of the National Constituent
Assembly, amid what the government has called a targeted media
campaign to destabilize the country and destroy its sovereignty.
International
media outlets rushed to discredit the vote, sharing grossly
misrepresentative accounts of the historic electoral process.
The
U.S. newspaper Washington Post, for instance, wrote "the
decision to hold the vote appeared set to prolong and deepen the
suffering of the people of Venezuela" — despite assurances
from Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro that the purpose of the
election was to ease economic and political conflicts with the
opposition.
The
Washington Post also insisted the nation’s 2.8 million state
workers "risked losing their jobs if they did not vote."
The
media outlet went even further, claiming the internal and democratic
election represented "a direct challenge" to the
administration of U.S. President Donald Trump after it demanded that
the government cancel the vote.
It
said Maduro "defiantly followed through Sunday with his pledge"
to hold the election, "creating a critical new stage in a
long-simmering crisis that could mint the Western Hemisphere’s
newest dictatorship."
These
inflammatory comments, however, do not acknowledge that the right to
call a National Constituent Assembly is included in the country's
Constitution and supported by several articles of its text. Indeed
the absolute independence of the members of the Constituent Assembly
to make changes to the Constitution is protected under these
articles.
Germany's
Deutsche Welle meanwhile said the election "will cement a
socialist dictatorship" — ignoring the fact that Venezuelans
have the right to call for a Constituent Assembly and that the new
Constitution will need to be approved by the people.
The
British media outlet BBC referenced the recent deaths during violent
protests in Caracas, placing the full responsibility for the clashes
between protesters and security forces.
But
Venezuelan Armed Forces have denied these accusations. In a press
conference Sunday, Minister of Defense Vladimir Padrino Lopez said
that none of the injuries or deaths could be attributed to the Armed
Forces. The article also ignores the eight members of the Armed
Forces who were severely injured while protecting Venezuelans' right
to vote.
The
CNN, a longtime critic of the Venezuelan government, argued the
Constituent Assembly was controlled by Maduro and that the "vote
would give the president immense political power."
This
statement fails to take into account that no other state institution
may interfere in the new legislative body. Only the 545 officials
elected by the citizens from different sectors of society can draft
the new Constitution.
CNN
also reported that Maduro would replace Venezuela's National Assembly
— a situation that has never been stated in the decree to call for
an open and direct vote.
Canada's
Globe and Mail said "voters broadly boycotted" the
election, ignoring the numerous of photos and videos of people lining
up to vote at dawn and even wading through swamps to reach the voting
centers. The article also does not include the countless reports of
seniors and people with disabilities eagerly casting votes across the
country.
"Caracas
was largely shut down with deserted streets and polling stations were
mostly empty, dealing a blow to the legitimacy of the vote,"
said the Globe and Mail without any evidence.
The
Guardian joined the mainstream criticism, calling the election an
action that will "seal the demise of the oil-rich nation’s
democracy."
Again,
the article failed to acknowledge the thousands of people who fought
to earn the opportunity to be candidates in this historical event,
including candidates from the LGBT community, student organizations
and women and campesino groups.
Finally,
the New York Times reported on the election with the headline: "As
Venezuela Prepares to Vote, Some Fear an End to Democracy."
The
article reported, "Maduro is pushing a radical plan to
consolidate his leftist movement’s grip over the nation,"
forgetting that candidates are not voted for according to their
political parties but through individual candidacies.
In
one of the bluntest accusations, the newspaper argued Maduro "has
refused to negotiate with street protesters," a claim that
blatantly ignores Maduro's ongoing calls for peaceful dialogue and
guidance from the Vatican.
It
concludes by accusing the president of Venezuela of seeking an
"unchecked authority not seen since the juntas that haunted
Latin American countries in decades past," as Maduro and the
Bolivarian Revolution have vowed to fight the same external
interference that brought the U.S. backed dictatorships to the region
in the 60's
Killings as Venezuela votes
Several people have been killed and protesters have clashed with security forces as Venezuelans vote for a new assembly with powers to rewrite the constitution
Deadly
protests rocked Venezuela on Sunday as voters broadly boycotted an
election for a constitutional super-body that unpopular leftist
President Nicolas Maduro vowed would begin a "new era of combat"
in the crisis-stricken nation.
The
U.S. government ordered family members of employees at its embassy in
Venezuela to leave on Thursday as a political crisis deepened ahead
of a controversial vote critics contend will end democracy in the
oil-rich country.
Oil
prices hit a two-month high on Monday, lifted by a tightening U.S.
crude market and the threat of sanctions against OPEC-member
Venezuela.
Brent
crude futures were at $52.82 per barrel at 0443 GMT on Monday, up 30
cents or 0.6 percent. Prices hit $52.90 per barrel earlier in the
day, their highest since May 25.
U.S.
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures were up 16 cents, or 0.3
percent, at $49.87 per barrel, and the entire WTI curve is close to
moving back over $50 per barrel, with only September and October a
notch below that level.
Violence
continued to rage on the street, with another seven people killed
during the latest opposition-led strike against President Nicolas
Maduro's planned election for a powerful new Constituent Assembly on
Sunday.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.