Great
analysis from Adam Garrie
Did
Russia learn The Art of the Deal? The curious timing of Russia’s
diplomatic retaliation
The
Art of The Deal meets popcorn passing on an epic geo-political scale.
Adam
Garrie
11
July, 2017
As
Russia threatens to expel US diplomats from the Russian Federation in
retaliation for the still unresolved and unatoned for expulsion of 35
Russian diplomats and embassy workers (including chefs) and the
seizure of Russian property in the US by order of Barack Obama in his
last month in office, the
biggest question is not why but why now?
It is
wise to remember that at the time, Vladimir Putin very publicly
declined to take retaliatory measures against the United States.
Instead, he issued a public statement that was both a dig at the very
lame duck Obama and one which extended a proverbial olive branch to
then President-elect Trump. President Putin’s statement is
reproduced below in its entirety.
“We regard the recent unfriendly steps taken by the outgoing US administration as provocative and aimed at further weakening the Russia-US relationship. This runs contrary to the fundamental interests of both the Russian and American people. Considering the global security responsibilities of Russia and the United States, this is also damaging to international relations as a whole.
As it proceeds from international practice, Russia has reasons to respond in kind. Although we have the right to retaliate, we will not resort to irresponsible ‘kitchen’ diplomacy but will plan our further steps to restore Russian-US relations based on the policies of the Trump Administration.
The diplomats who are returning to Russia will spend the New Year’s holidays with their families and friends. We will not create any problems for US diplomats. We will not expel anyone. We will not prevent their families and children from using their traditional leisure sites during the New Year’s holidays. Moreover, I invite all children of US diplomats accredited in Russia to the New Year and Christmas children’s parties in the Kremlin.
It is regrettable that the Obama Administration is ending its term in this manner. Nevertheless, I offer my New Year greetings to President Obama and his family.
My season’s greetings also to President-elect Donald Trump and the American people.
I wish all of you happiness and prosperity”.
For
his part, then President elect Trump responded by condemning Obama’s
move on social media, saying,
Donald J. Trump
about 6 months ago
Donald J. Trump
It’s time for our country to move on to bigger and better things. Nevertheless, in the interest of our country and its great people, I will meet with leaders of the intelligence community next week in order to be updated on the facts of this situation.
So
it was clear in December of 2016 that Putin was waiting to handle the
issue with President Trump and that Trump was disinterested in
carrying on Obama’s acts and showed interest in reconciling the
issue with Russia.
To
understand the seriousness, indeed the heinousness of what Obama did,
a mass expulsion of embassy staff and the seizure of ambassadorial
property is against every protocol of international relations and is
by many accounts an illegal act, especially in a period which is
technically time of peace between the nations involved.
Obama
not only seized Russian owned property but did so on what is legally
Russian soil. Some could call it a soft act of war. One ought to
remember that it is the very letter of the law affirming that embassy
property is on the legal territory and jurisdiction of the country to
which the embassy belongs, in this case the territory of The Russian
Federation, that has caused the US, Sweden and the UK a great
deal of trouble in their relentless war of aggression against a
single Australian man.
This
legal fact is indeed the reason why Julian Assange has not yet been
molested by British authorities who seem eager to do so and have
promised as much should he leave the embassy and legally step onto UK
soil. The Ecuadorian Embassy in London is Ecuadorian sovereign
territory, not British territory, in spite of being situated in
London.
The
question therefore is, why wasn’t this dealt with by Russia and the
Trump administration in January or February of 2017, given how
pressing the issue was and remains?
The
only logical answer is that Russia showed an extreme amount of
patience as Donald Trump found his feet in the very hostile US
domestic political environment.
Russia took
what can only be called an extremely gentlemanly
approach and waited until the Russian President could meet Donald
Trump in person before taking the retaliatory measures that most
foreign leaders would have taken instantly.
Although
Sergey Lavrov spoke after the G20 meeting between the Russian and US
Presidents saying that the US was committed to resolving the issue,
clearly, the lack of enthusiasm and speed from the US side has led
Russia to make the dramatic yet entirely proportional and therefore
entirely correct threat publicly.
It
is critical to remember that Russian and US officials are working
to solve the issue at
this very moment, therefore Russia is still giving the US one final
chance to right the situation before taking any action. The
question then goes to, why did Russia not wait to make the threat
until the time that such negotiations might reach a brick wall and
fail?
The
best answer to this question is that the Russians have learned the
art of the deal. Make a reasonable offer and if your negotiating
opponent becomes slow or unreasonable, walk out of the negotiating
room while making one’s position known, should the other side
foolishly not come back to the table.
Putin
has now met with Donald Trump for the first time and Lavrov has met
him for the second time in several months. Both men must at least
have a generally good feel for Trump as a man and unlike many
countries, the human side is deeply important to Russia. Russia deals
with people over and above jargon.
Had
Obama still been POTUS, chances are that Russia would have made good
on its threat instantly. With Trump in the White House, a man who
will famously sit and negotiate anything like any good businessman,
Russia is playing with carrots and sticks, something which was
increasingly useless when dealing with Obama, a man who had become a
soft-spoken fanatic, vis-a-vis Trump who likes a good tough
negotiation and has said so repeatedly.
Just
as much of America’s belligerence towards North Korea appears to be
a deeply misguided move to show China that the US is ‘tougher’
and more serious than it used to be, Russia is most likely publicly
playing hardball with this issue to show Trump the same, the only
difference being no one is threatening to physically hurt anyone
because it is not Russia’s style to act so disproportionately.
The
ball is in Trump’s court. It is clear that he does not have strong
feelings on the issue and would most likely rather it go away. That
being said, many in the US will be savagely telling Trump not to
budge on the issue because of the nonsense that is Russigate.
In
this sense, Russia is equally challenging Trump to, for lack of a
better term, show that he has bigger balls than the deep state. If
the US reaches an 11th hour agreement with Russia, the answer is that
he has.
If
the issue was not so serious, this would be the best reality TV show
ever made!
As
they say, pass the popcorn.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.