Australia: FOI
documents confirm government holding almost one year's worth of
pollution data
SMH,
7
July, 2017
The federal government
has been keeping almost a year's worth of pollution data secret,
despite it being scheduled for release in May, documents obtained
under freedom of information laws reveal.
Independent estimates
suggest Australia's greenhouse gas emissions have risen sharply since
the government last released its quarterly data in December - a trend
that would make the nation's commitment to cutting emissions more
disruptive and expensive.
Quarterly updates by the
National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, described as "up-to-date
information on emissions trends for business, policymakers and the
public", have been released 28 times since 2009, but not since
last year.
Documents obtained under
FOI by the Australian Conservation Foundation reveal that while the
government possesses data on greenhouse pollution for the two
quarters leading up to the end of last year, it has failed to release
them.
Environment and Energy
Minister Josh Frydenberg did not answer Fairfax Media's questions
about the missing data.
However, a spokeswoman
for the minister said the September 2016 Quarterly Update was going
through "the usual clearance processes prior to publication"
and that "no publication date [had] been set".
"As has always
occurred in the past, the government will release the data."
The chief executive
officer of ACF, Kelly O'Shanassy, said the government appeared to be
going to "extreme lengths" to remove global warming
entirely from the national debate.
"Hiding pollution
isn't a solution to the Turnbull government's paralysis on climate
change and energy policy, but it's exactly what you would do if you
knew you were going to fail to meet your international commitments to
reduce pollution," she said.
"We are concerned
Australia is not going to meet its 2030 target to reduce emissions by
26-28 per cent."
Documents
obtained under FOI reveal the department recommended the results for
release from March 31, without a media release. style="box-sizing:
border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family:
inherit; font-size: inherit; font-style: normal; font-variant:
inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height:
inherit; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(119, 117, 121);"Photo:
Supplied
Departmental
correspondence obtained under FOI confirms advice that the data be
released "from March 31" and that the team was "preparing
for release of the full set of accounts late on Friday 26 May".
But that did not happen.
The most recent data
published by the inventory showed Australia's emissions had increased
0.8 per cent in the year to June 2016, while emissions from the
electricity sector alone increased by 1.2 per cent.
"Australians deserve
transparency. I think it's crystal clear the Australian government is
not taking its commitment to reduce pollution seriously," Ms
O'Shanassy said.
According to estimates by
consultant Ndevr Environmental, Australia's overall emissions
increased by 1.15 per cent in the first quarter of this year, while
electricity sector emissions increased by 11 per cent.
The overall emissions
increase is equivalent to an extra 2,308,846 cars on the road.
According to Ndevr
Environmental, the increase is almost entirely attributable to
electricity emissions, while other sectors such as transport
emissions decreased over the quarter.
The environmental
consultant began publishing its own estimates of Australia's
greenhouse gases last year, by closely replicating the government
methodology.
"We pulled apart the
government's historical quarterly reports, looked at all references …
and basically reverse engineered it," said Ndevr Environmental's
managing director Matt Drum.
Ndevr Environmental
achieved a 99.19 and 99.55 per cent accuracy rating on estimates it
made for the March and June quarters of last year, after
cross-referencing them with the government's results.
"When [the pollution
results] are released, I'd say the government's will be very close to
ours," Mr Drum said.
"With no price on
carbon, no effective policy settings, I don't see anything that would
cause a step change or downward push on emissions."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.