There are many comments coming from all directions. I will limit myself to Vladimir Suchan, the Saker and an article in Voice of Russia.
Putin's
dilemma and Rubicon when making favorable references to the Devil
bent on invading Russia
8
June 2014
Can
Putin afford to be indifferent to the plight of ethnic Russians in
Ukraine, while complimenting Poroshenko? And complimenting Poroshenko
for what exactly?
President
Putin back on March 4,2014: "If we are to notice, that these
outrages begin in Eastern regions (of the Ukraine), and if people
appeal to us for help, as do we already have the official appeal from
the legitimate acting president, then we reserve the right to protect
those citizens by all means available to us. We believe this would be
completely legitimate. Such a decision will only be taken to protect
Ukrainian citizens, so let any of their military personnel even
attempt to shoot at their own people, behind whom we do stand. Not up
front but we do stand behind. Let them even try to shoot at women and
children." Vladimir Putin, March 4, 2014, Official transcript
After
that, notably beginning with the Geneva Agreement of April 17, the
Russian government started moving away from its firm position of the
unconstitutionality of the violent coup of February 21-23 and,
instead, started granting ever more legitimacy to the Kiev regime,
while falling ever more short of confirming legitimacy to the
referenda in eastern Ukraine and the Donetsk and Lugansk People's
Republics and Novorossyia, which Putin himself evoked in his
four-hours-long interview on March 7. By yielding ever more
legitimacy to the Kiev regime, Russia is taking more and more
legitimacy from its support for ethnic Russians in Ukraine and from
its possible Russian intervention and involvement.
In
his interview on June 4, 2014, with Radio Europe 1 and TF1 TV
channel, Putin said namely the following in response to a question
about the alleged "democratic vote" for Poroshenko: "I’ve
already told you and will say it again: we will respect the choice of
the Ukrainian people and we will cooperate with Ukrainian
authorities. ... Yes, we recognize [Ukraine's] sovereignty."
Does this mean recognition of sovereignty as embodied and practiced
by the current regime ruling in Ukraine?
In
the same interview, Putin also explained again Russia's position on
Crimean and its reunification with Russia: "Russian troops were
in Crimea under the international treaty on the deployment of the
Russian military base. It’s true that Russian troops helped
Crimeans hold a referendum on their (a) independence and (b) desire
to join the Russian Federation. No one can prevent these people from
exercising a right that is stipulated in Article 1 of the UN Charter,
the right of nations to self-determination. ... In accordance with
the expression of the will of people who live there, Crimea is part
of the Russian Federation and its constituent entity. I want everyone
to understand this clearly. We conducted an exclusively diplomatic
and peaceful dialogue – I want to stress this – with our partners
in Europe and the United States. In response to our attempts to hold
such a dialogue and to negotiate an acceptable solution, they
supported the anti-constitutional state coup in Ukraine, and
following that we could not be sure that Ukraine would not become
part of the North Atlantic military bloc. In that situation, we could
not allow a historical part of the Russian territory with a
predominantly ethnic Russian population to be incorporated into an
international military alliance, especially because Crimeans wanted
to be part of Russia. I am sorry, but we couldn't act differently."
In
other words, Putin evoked the principle of self-determination and
emphasized its notable expression through a referendum, which
happened when the political regime of Ukraine was radically changed
from "merely" thieving oligarchy to oligarchy that placed
fascist radicals in charge and control of state security, its armed
forces and police in the ever escalating campaign of war, terror, and
massacre unleashed on those who oppose this unconstitutional change.
In other words, oligarchy moved through a violent coup and Molotov
cocktails over to only an oligarchic dictatorship, but further to a
fascist, military dictatorship. This regime change further greatly
increased the risk of this regime making Ukraine into a NATO
"bridgehead" 400 miles towards the gates of Moscow, which
is actually also precisely what Brzezinski himself defined as the US
strategic goal (Grand Strategy. pp. 46, 86, 203).
However,
to the threat of NATO aggressive expansion (it is aggressive and not
really "peaceful" or stabilizing, as it is presented--one
only needs to remember Kosovo, Libya, or Syria), Putin also added the
significance of Crimea being the home to Russia's Black Sea Navy. And
that's the only one key difference, which I can see, between the case
of Crimea and the case of Novorossiya (the Donetsk and Lugansk
People's Republics). The latter happened to have no Russian military
base. Yet their case is as good, if not stronger than Crimea's. In
Crimea, the referendum was conducted with Russian troops stepping in
and preventing outbreak of violence (which was actually planned and
prepared by the Right Sector and other elements of the junta). In the
Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, the referenda were organized
by the new revolutionary and popular organs of power emerging from
below and without presence of Russian troops. Moreover, against these
new people's republics, the fascist junta has sent the army, the
police, the Naz-guard, the Right Sector and private armies (or rather
death squads) of Ukrainian mafia oligarchs.
The
other fact is, as Arsen Avakov, the junta's interior minister,
boasted on his FB page, that the Kiev regime succeeded in the
meantime to suppress and disperse antifascist opposition in Odessa
and Kharkov. And unless anyone was still in any doubt about the
nature of the current regime in Kiev (which the Western media and
Western politicians keep painting as an incredible democracy), the
same Avakov also announced on his FB page that self-defense in
eastern Ukraine "must be exterminated like mad dogs; no
negotiations."
At
the same time, as Poroshenko made it very clear in his inaugural
speech, the junta is convinced that, except for the armed resistance
in eastern Ukraine, it faces no other significant and effective
deterrent or constraint. Its decision, methodically implemented, has
thus been ever more violent escalation.
In
this situation, the West is working hard to deter, that is, to
prevent, any effective counter-measures and defense on the part of
Russia and antifascist opposition in Ukraine. This is, in fact, the
very strategic idea formulated by Brzezinski: to make such moves and
create such conditions that would leave Russia no choice, but to
choose what the West would compel it to: "... one thing is
certain : [the plan] will move faster if a geopolitical context is
shaped that propels Russia in that direction, while foreclosing other
temptations [ = choices]. ... the sooner [will] the black hole of
Euroasia be filled ... Indeed, for Russia the dilemma of the one
alternative [dictated by the US] is no longer a matter of making a
geopolitical choice but of facing up the imperatives of
survival."(Grand Chessboard, p. 122, last paragraph) As
Brzezinski makes it clear elsewhere, "the imperatives of
survival" is understood by Brzezinski and other fathers of grand
strategy is a matter of Russia's "Darwinian" extinction as
a power and civilization "not fit" to continue as part of
the intended New World Order: The goal of this "grand plan"
for Russia and its civilization is "to acquire ... ethnic
conflict [and] political fragmentation" (Grand Chessboard, p.
150).
Are
these developments not connected?
Ukraine's
new king Petro Poroshenko seems to have an ambition to combine a
wrathful Achilles with a crafty Odysseus in his own oligarchic
persona in a country that is but a shade of one's mighty Soviet
Union. One day after his inauguration at which one of the guards
dropped himself right after his rifle, Poroshenko held a three-party
meeting with a Russian Ambassador and a representative of the OSCE.
There he declared that he wants to have a ceasefire sometime within a
week. It seems that part of his "peace plan" might be a
demand that all the antifascists from the Donetsk and Lugansk
People's Republics exile themselves to Russia. The rest would need to
bow their neck and submit to a new NATO protectorate helped with
cheap gas from Russia, while the pool of animosity, instability and
chaos would continue as inflammation meant to reach soon enough the
root canal of Moscow.
For
"security" in this new Ukraine is to be guaranteed by
Poroshenko's new "private army" or Poroshenko's own
"presidential force"--the Right Sector/National Guard. In
fact. the Right Sector, as its leader Dmitry Yarosh explained, wants
to be even more than that. The Right Sector wants to the new
Praetorian Guard of this fascist dictatorship--the supreme arbiter
and power in Ukraine. The goal of the Right Sector is to "create
a system of control over the president and the parliament ... so that
if the president takes an anti-state course, we will compel him to
follow the demands of Maidan."
Meanwhile,
Victoria Nuland who was handing out cookies on Maidan to Berkut
before they were shot by the same snipers who were also shooting
Maidan people, met on June 8 in Odessa with the Right Sector banker
Oleg Kolomeysky, also known for issuing bounties for the heads of
antifascist leaders and fighters. Nuland discussed with the
billionaire who is also the junta-appointed head of the
Dniepropetrovsk province, "financial assistance" of the US
for the regime. As an added PR exercise, she also paid a visit to a
local orphanage where she left the orphans with a box of soccer
balls, while on the way of implementing the Empire's policies that
produce a mass of new orphans.
Nuland
made sure to emphasize that the US is supporting "positive
changes in Ukraine and the new government's policy of further
stabilization, especially in the east of Ukraine," where
"stabilization" is evidently a cipher or euphemism for
killing the people by the regime
Saker
rant: Please tell me my worst fears will not come true!
8
June, 2014
Several
Serbian commentators have expressed their concern, if not outright
worry, about what is happening right now in Novorossia. I have to
admit that I now share that concern. While I am not Serbian myself,
some of the longtime readers of that blog know that I have had the
opportunity to follow the entire war in Bosnia and Croatia literally
minute by minute while working for the UN far away from Yugoslavia,
but with daily access to UNPROFOR reports and with the possibility to
debrief any UNPROFOR officers including two Force Commanders. For me
this war will forever feel 'raw' because that was the event which
really opened by eyes to the nature of the so-called "free and
democratic West" and which, combined with the war in Chechnia,
eventually cost me my career. I will thus readily admit that I might
be over-reacting. In fact, my brain tells me one thing, but my gut
tells me another and as a result I am feeling a very unpleasant but
persistent feeling of alarm.
It
all began when I finally listened to the full inauguration speech of
Poroshenko. Up to that moment, I had some hopes that while even
though this would be difficult, some kind of reasonable beginning of
some kind of peace process could be negotiated with the man. I knew
that the guy was an unprincipled prostitute, but it was precisely
that "quality" which made me cautiously hopeful: better a
rational prostitute that a crazed lunatic, right?
Listening
to him I understood that in this case Poroshenko was completely
bought by the USA and that vague European effort to negotiate
something had be summarily tossed out into the trash bin. As I wrote
in a previous post, his message to Novorossia and Russia was as
simple as it was blunt:
- No federalization
- No state status for the Russian language
- No recognition of the Novorossian political leadership
- Full and unconditional surrender of the Novorossian Defense Forces
- Crimea will forever belong to the Ukraine
So this was Poroshenko's "peace plan". In fact, Juan was absolutely right: it was a declaration of war combined with an ultimatum demanding a total and unconditional surrender. The fingerprints of Uncle Sam were all over the place. I was appalled by the lunacy of this "peace plan" but soon my disgust turned into horror when I saw the Russian reaction.
Instead
of walking out from this zoo (Poroshenko got US-style standing
ovations at each of the worst of his statement), the Russian
ambassador just sat there. The Ministry of Foreign affairs did not
comment either. As for the Russian media, it did summarize the
event, but most of its attention was focused on the latest kidnapping
of yet another two Russian journalists and on the floods around
Barnaul in Russia. As for Putin, he announced that the had ordered
the FSB to close down the section of the border which had been
liberated by the NDF to prevent "the passage of illegal groups".
Not
good. Not good at all. And it did remind me of Bosnia.
Quick
flashback: the Bosnian Serbs had basically won the war and defeated
both the Bosnian-Croats and their supporters in Croatia and the
Bosnian-Muslims and their supporters from the Muslim world. And yet
they had to do that in spite of Milosevic who had agreed to cooperate
with the AngloZionist by participating in the Empire's blockade of
the Bosnian-Serb even though he knew full well that the Croats were
getting convoys full of weapons, ammo and supplies from Croatia and
that the Muslims were getting the same courtesy of the US and Turkish
Air Forces. Milosevic sold out his own people against a promise to
be allowed to rule over Serbia and Montenegro. That promise was
eventually broken (most AngloZionist "promises" are), but
at that time he thought he could negotiate with the devil. He then
sold out the Serbs of Kosovo (the craddle of Serbia no less than Kiev
is the craddle of Russia). That he then died poisoned in the Hague
is hardly a consolation to me.
Now,
as a good friend told me: Putin is not Milosevic and, besides, if
Putin caves in now he would be committing political suicide. I
agree. Or, should I say, my brain agrees. My gut is in full "red
alert" mode and I have been walking with a knot in my stomach
since 2 days now. Here is why,
First,
I don't think that Putin can simply pretend not to have noticed
Poroshenko's absolutely insane speech. What a candidate says is,
indeed, not very relevant, but an inaugural speech is really a
totally different matter: it is, by definition, a *program speech*
which outlines the goals of the new President.
Second,
what is happening now in Slaviansk, Kramatorsk and the rest of
Novorossia is a humanitarian catastrophe and Putin has promised to
prevent that.
Third,
Russia's careful and non-provocative stance is gradually being
interpreted by the western media as a sign of weakness and this
perception might be, in part, the cause for the escalation in both
atrocities by the regime in Kiev and of the increasingly arrogant
anti-Russian rhetoric of Western politicians.
I
am most definitely not an admirer of Dugin, but he recently said
something which I fully agree with: he said that the future of the
planet is being decided in Slaviansk, Kramatorsk, Krasnyi Liman and
the rest of Novorossia because the outcome of this battle will decide
whether Russia can stand her ground against AngloZionist Empire and
thereby initiate the liberation of the rest of the world or whether
Russia will basically cave in. I fully agree with him. It is not an
exaggeration to say that the future of the planet is being decided
right now in Novorossia.
This
is why I have a knot in my stomach. So far, I am most definitely not
seeing the kind of reaction Poroshenko's speech deserves. And it is
not just words, like some say. The day of Poroshenko's inauguration
saw a violent increase in artillery strikes on Novorossia and an
attack on a high level Novorussian official. Today - a Ukie
artillery shell hit a church were the faithful were assembled for the
feast of the Pentecost.
Putin
has promised the Russian people (in Russia proper and outside) that
he would not allow massive atrocities to take place against the
population of Novorossia. They are clearly happening now. As for
the "new" regime in Kiev, it is every bit as Nazi as the
worst Right Sector lunatic would want. Uncle Sam has basically
crushed every EU attempt at a negotiated outcome. This is most
definitely not Putin's fault or the fault of the poor people of
Novorossiia, but there can me no more hope for a reasonable
negotiated settlement.
Russia
has to act now and used her armed forces to liberate Novorossia. Not
to do so would be a betrayal of the Russian people.
My
brain tells me that Putin will give the order to do so very soon.
But the memories of Bosnia haunt me. So far Putin's track record is
excellent, pretty close to perfect. But for all my support for his
policies, I never *trusted* him, at least not fully. Honestly, I
cannot image what will happen if he does not give the order to move
in because if he fails to do so he would be giving up on the entire
strategic plan of what I call the Eurasian Sovereignists to
"resovereignize" Russia and liberate her from the
AngloZionist Empire. I cannot and do not want to believe that 14
years of struggle involving a great deal of dangers and, at times,
truly superhuman efforts will now go to waste. And yet I have this
knot sitting there inside my gut and that knot gets worse and worse
with each lame and vapid statement coming out of the Kremlin.
The
US is hell-bent on war with Russia and the EU has completely sold
out. Nothing new here, the European elites *always* joined in what I
call a "Ecumenical anti-Russian coalition" with the SOB of
the day against Russia: they did so when the Papacy launched a
crusade on Orthodoxy, they did so under Napoleon, they did so during
the Crimean War and they did so during the Third Reich. So now that
Eurotrash is on the side of Uncle Shmuel (a more accurate name for
Uncle Sam, don't you think?). What else is new?
This
latest war might not be a "hot" one (although I really
would not put anything past the AngloZionsit 1%ers), but it sure will
be total and merciless anyhow. And there is only one way to put and
end to this: the Russian bear must bare his fangs, make an example
with the Ukie Nazis and show these European imbeciles that Russia
means business.
So
please tell me that I am wrong and that when push comes to shove
Putin will have willpower and courage to stand his ground against
what I can only call a satanic coalition of the most evil ideologies
and people I can think of. I fully supported Russia's
non-intervention right up until Saturday and Poroshenko's speech, but
that policy has been taken to its limits and, to my immense regret,
it has failed, primarily due to the truly unbelievable cowardice and
immorality of the European political leaders (may they all rot in
hell for selling out their own people the way they did it!). It
makes no sense to hope for a last minute miracle: those accursed EU
bureaucrats did not find even a atom of dignity or decency inside
themselves and as a result a full-scale Cold War v2 in Europe is now
inevitable (the Bulgarians pushed their treachery one step beyond and
under orders from MCCain agreed to stop the work on South Stream).
My
brain tells me that Putin will give the order. Soon.
But
I have that horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach.
Please
tell me that Putin is not Milosevic.
Please
tell me my worst fears will not come true.
The
Saker
My
rant tonight - okay, I will try to clarify further
8
June, 2014
Okay,
predictably some has misunderstood my rant as a change in heart.
Others wonder what has changed over the past 24 hours. So let me
clarify:
1)
No change of heart? No - Putin did the right thing by waiting as
long as was possible. I just don't believe that waiting is possible
any more. Why not?
2)
What has changed? Not just words, but actions by Poroshenko. I,
along with many other observers in Russia, had hopes that Poroshenko
would use his "clean hands status" to come up with at least
a temporary cease-fire followed by negotiations. Heck - even a 48
hour break to "celebrate" his "election" would
have been helpful. All that happened was a dramatic increase in
violence. Also, Merkel did specifically ask for a meeting with Putin
and I had some hopes that the bitch has something useful to say to
him. But the EU leaders did, again, show that as soon as Uncle
Shmuel shows up they turn into the "great supine protoplasmic
invertebrate jellies".
Finally,
Poroshenko did more than just spew some garden variety Ukie nonsense.
He specifically committed himself to one language, no federation, no
negotiations (at least not with those folks who matter) and he topped
it all with a completely surreal statement about the Crimea being
forever Ukie. Ok, these are not just words, the man cornered himself
into a crazy, maximalist position. Some ask what I was expecting and
say add that Poroshenko had no other options. Nonsense! He could
have said something along these lines:
The
blood of the glorious Ukrainian people is sacred to me and my first
duty is to prevent it from being spilled (= stop the shelling). I
shall never rest until each and every Ukrainian will feel that he/she
is a precious part of an inclusive Ukrainian society whose historical
roots have always been diverse and multi-national (language issue).
The Ukraine must forever become a land of peace and peaceful trade (=
neutrality). There is no personal sacrifice I shall not consent to
achieve these lofty goals (= negotiate with the Novorossians). Etc.
etc. etc.
Guys,
this is not that hard. Not to mention that NOW would have been the
correct time to get rid of the Nazis while the "eyes of the
world" were upon the "legitimate President of the Ukraine".
Poroshenko
totally blew it. Totally.
And
not because he is dumb. All those who know him agree on two things:
he is a total prostitute and he is very smart. In this case, he was
simply reading the speech written for him by Uncle Shmuel.
So
that is what changed:
a)
a total collapse and surrender by the EU 1%ers
b)
a total sellout of Poroshenko to Uncle Shmuel
And
this is why I see no point in waiting any longer. That, and the fact
that if time is on Russia's side (which it is - Banderastan is not
viable), time is not on the side of the people of Novorossia who need
help now.
So
no, no change of heart. Change in objective circumstances. Remember
dialectics 101: a quantitative change does eventually result in a
qualitative change. I think that we have reached this point now.
As
for my fear, it is primarily triggered by what I perceive as a
"wishy-washy" tone out of Moscow. If that tone is designed
to allow for a last ditch effort (I hear that Poroshenko has now
announced that combats should stop this week) or for a cover for an
intervention - fine. But something needs to be done in the next
24-48 hours and my Bosnian experience makes it very hard for me to
live through these next couple of days.
Last,
and frankly: I want the Polite Armed Men in Green to make minced meat
of the Ukie Nazis involved in this disgusting war on civilians.
These SOBs don't deserve to live, imnsho.
I
hope that I have explained myself to the satisfaction of at least
most of you.
Kind
regards,
The
Saker
Slavyansk: A battle for a peaceful life
Selling
out Ukraine: Poroshenko speech; double talk, lies, NATO and the EU
John
Robles
8
June 2014
US
Vice President Joe Biden’s smiling and nodding attendance of the
inauguration of Ukrainian President was the final stroke in
legitimizing a leader and a government brought about by a US backed
and orchestrated coup d’état. Sure Mr. Biden has a lot to smile
about: not only has his government successfully destabilized another
country for the US corporate military industrial complex but he has
secured his youngest son Hunter Biden a million dollar job
establishing his family's place in the future of the American elite
hierarchal oligarchy.
To
top it all off Biden and his American elitist cronies have more or
less successfully managed to demonize Russia for their entire
operation.
Western
Backers Gloat
Watching
a tanned Biden smiling and nodding next to his blonde trophy wife at
many of the wrong moments during the inauguration of Washington's
latest puppet Petr Poroshenko, it was clear that he was only
pretending he understood what he was witnessing. Like gum chewing
Obama at Normandy/Mandela, Victoria Nuland posing for photo ops with
triumvirate (Yatsenyuk, Tyahnybok and Klitschko) , John Kerry and his
Syrian "we knows" and George Bush and his entire two terms,
Joe Biden proved to the part of the world that has a real
understanding of the events and the history of Ukraine that the
Washington political elites are nothing but overpaid empty suits who
are completely and totally ignorant of anything and everything beyond
their little bubble-like worlds of self-serving lies and manufactured
realities.
It
would be something to ridicule and laugh about but in their ignorance
they are killing millions of people, spreading misery and despair and
devastating the planet and destroying the future for all peoples
including their own citizens and the scary thing is they do not even
understand, let alone care how they are devastating the planet and
causing death and misery all over the world.
Poroshenko's
Challenges
There
is no way that exit poll president Poroshenko will be elected again
if the Ukrainian election system returns to something approaching a
democratic process therefore he has a very short time to attain his
objectives. Number one is ensuring an EU agreement is signed,
establishing NATO infrastructure in Ukraine, quelling dissent and
attempting to keep eastern regions in Ukraine without federalizing
the country (an impossibility), avoiding his own prosecution for war
crimes, ensuring the long term survival of the fascists who have
attained power and their continued escape from justice and the
protection of the oligarchs and their western masters from
prosecution and from the people of Ukraine. In short he has to
continue to attempt to legitimize the junta and its western masters
and keep them from facing justice for crimes ranging from treason to
genocide.
Poroshenko’s
Inauguration Speech and his Audience: Fascist Nationalists and
Western Sponsors
From
the outset it is clear that Poroshenko's speech was written not for
the Ukrainian people as a whole but for a very narrow audience of
foreign sponsors from the US and the EU, for whom he was the most
desirable choice (the wise grandfatherly figure) and for all of the
national socialist, fascist and nazi forces that allowed his rise to
power.
His
speech began by quoting Ivan Franko, a famous poet and the co-founder
a Ukrainian Radical Party and a nationalist anarchist Mikhail
Drahomanov who both played an important role in the development of
the Ukrainian ultra-right nationalist movement and who in their day
faced persecution for their extremist views.
Denying
Ukraine's historic ties to Russia and the history of Kievan Rus
Poroshenko stated that: "The return of Ukraine to its natural,
European state has been long-awaited by many generations," this
is clearly an affront to all Ukrainians who see their historic ties
to Russia as being important, but plays to the European aspirations
of nationalists, something that has gone hand in hand with Ukrainian
nationalism and was most marked with the 1917 revolution and the
beginning of the Soviet Union.
Recent
History Revised: Legitimizing the Maidan Coup
Poroshenko,
in his wording, is attempting to characterize (as has been the
narrative but forward by the West) the western backed coup and the
armed neo-nazi nationalist thugs on Maidan who assisted in
overthrewing the democratically elected government, as a popular
revolt with its cause being the EU agreement. Calling the previous
contitutional democratically elected government a "dictatorship"
is completey disengenous and in fact and outright lie. While the
supposed pretext of the Maidan (manipulated by the West as they
unleashed their paid thugs and Right Sector military formations) was
the signing of an EU association agreement, any popular discontent
that may have existed was due to poor living conditions, unemployment
and corruption caused by oligarchs like himself. Saying a the
previous government also sought to deprive the Ukrainian people of EU
agreement is also not true as President Yanukovich merely said such a
move had to be studied further. This theme clearly ignores the wishes
of the majority of Ukrainians who wanted to improve relations with
Russia and the socio-economic realities on the ground. It also
ignores the fact that waht happened on the Maidan was a US organized
revolt. Something few in the West watn to address even though the
evidence was made clear by the US' own officials.
He
calls the disgraceful destruction to property, fires, the killing of
police and security forces and the overthrow of a democratically
elected president who merely wanted to take a pause to study an EU
agreement that was being fast-tracked into law as something
dignified.
"Dictatorship
that ruled Ukraine in recent years sought to deprive us of this
prospect (Europeanization) people rebelled. Victorious Revolution of
dignity…."
He
further attempted to legitimize Ukraine's nazis by calling them
fighters for independence. The enslaving of Ukraine to the EU, NATO,
the IMF and the US he apparently equates to "independence."
It is quite stunning actually.
"Entire generations of Ukrainian patriots struggled for our independence."
Transferring
Blame for Junta’s Punitive War
Apparently
Poroshenko is concerned about the fact that he is guilty of war
crimes for continuing the junta’s punitive war and collective
punishment on the civilians and the people of Donbass. He attempts to
portray the war as having originated within Donbass ignoring the
reality that it is a punitive operation after the population in the
region rose up against the fascist junta and refused to be led by an
illegitimate government. That government launched a war on the people
while labelling it a terrorist operation. Again he tries to tie it
with Europeanization and for some reason believes that he can get
away with calling the democratically elected government of Victor
Yanukovich “tyranny”. Reality has no meaning for Poroshenko, he
can say anything he wants.
"A
real war, planned and unleashed in the Ukrainian Donbass, became an
obstacle for enormous opportunities that opened for the European
modernization of Ukraine after the fall of tyranny."
A
Moment of Silence for the Fascists? No Mention of Berkut
If
anyone had the illusion that Poroshenko represents all of the
Ukrainian people the error of that belief should be clear by his
moment of silence for the Right Sector and assorted nationalists who
died on the Maidan. He did not mention the brave Berkut officers who
were unarmed and beaten to death, he did not mention the possibly
over 100 people who were brutally murdered and burned alive in
Odessa, he did not mention the victims of pogroms in Mariupol or
other locations in Ukraine, nor did he mention those being killed by
the Ukrainian army as I am writing this. He mentioned the “heroes”
of the Maidan, the assorted Bandera nazi trash that killed and are
killing anyone opposed to their fascist power grab. For Poroshenko,
his western masters and the fascists in the Rada all of these people
mean nothing. As the Right Sector calls them, they are mere
"insects."
"Heroes
of Nebesna Sotnya died for it. Let us honor the memory of those who
died for freedom and independence of Ukraine with a moment of
silence."
A
Phony Peace Plan
Much
hailed by the West and the western media as a sign of his moderate
decency, his normalcy set to counter act a growing level of
questioning and disgust in the West by those who are actually
obtaining access to the real information coming out of Ukraine,
Poroshenko's peace plan is being promoted granting the illusion that
he wants peace and is not in fact continuing the wholesale killing of
the populations in the east of the country.
Poroshenko’s
peace plan is a complete farce, even if taken at face value. As the
operations are being orchestrated by the West who is manipulating the
language no doubt to protect Poroshenko from future prosecution the
wording has to be studied carefully and his "offers of piece"
looked at critically against the backdrop of what is really happening
in the country. It would appear that the "plan" or perhaps
it is better to call it the "final solution" is merely a
Trojan horse and a license to continue the war against the Ukrainian
people.
By
stating the word revenge from the start Poroshenko is implying that
there is in fact a reason for taking revenge and names that reason
the sacrifices being made by the people of Ukraine before his eyes.
Of course in his kindness he chooses not to do so. This is a
completely obvious manipulation of the language and again a
transference of the blame setting up a future defense that he was
just moved by the suffering of his people.
Given
that many of the people assembled around him were directly involved
in the murder of civilians all over Ukraine and were in fact the
architects of the punitive military campaign being waged against the
people he completely ignores this fact and makes it clear who the
“criminals” are, Russian speakers and those opposed to the junta.
"I
do not want revenge. Even though there are great sacrifices of the
people of Ukraine before my eyes."
Continuing
that mien he ignores the fact it is the Maidan thugs and terrorists,
the Right Sector, the private fascist militias, Greystone mercenaries
and Nazi paramilitaries that are waging a punitive war against the
civilian populations in the east. Implying that the people do not
have the right to defend themselves against an army gone mad killing
its own people, he pulls out the terrorist card. He also follows the
Right Sector claim that they took up arms legally.
Here
it is important to note the similarities to the US strategy, for
example in Afghanistan where the US labelled everyone terrorists and
literally attempted to make it illegal for the people of Afghanistan
to defend themselves, hauling anyone who resisted to Guantanamo or
killing them outright. How anyone is supposed to believe that women
and children and pensioners who are Orthodox Christians are
terrorists is not important for the West they are operating on
Goebbels' strategy.
“I
strongly urge everyone who illegally took weapons in their hands to
lay them down. In response, I first of all guarantee the exemption
from criminal responsibility for those who do not have blood of
Ukrainian soldiers and civilians on their hands. And those who is not
involved in funding terrorism.”
The
second point he makes is perhaps the most ridiculous and like the
previous transfers blame, demonizes Russia and does not reflect the
reality of the situation. He takes no issue with the Greystone
mercenaries but claims there are Russian mercenaries in Ukraine.
These are the same invisible Russian mercenaries who no one sees
because they are secret and who have operate invisibly as ghosts not
leaving a single sign of their presence in the country, again a
complete and total fabrication by the junta and the US.
Amid
Russian calls for a humanitarian corridor to allow women and children
and civilians to leave Donbass rather than face the endless bombings
and the war of extermination being carried out by the junta and
Poroshenko, he makes a mockery of the very idea. Truly disgusting.
"Second,
controlled corridor for Russian mercenaries who would like to return
home."
If
all of this was not bad enough it only gets worse and even though
much was made of the fact that he spoke Russian this is just another
propaganda ploy. He ignores that the populations of Donetsk and
Lugansk held referendums and now are no longer part of Ukraine as
they have chosen to determine their own futures, a right being denied
to them by the US/NATO and the junta and for which they are being
killed, and then tries to say that there are terrorists who have
brought the East into a state of war, when it is in fact the forces
under his command. The people of Donetsk and Slavyansk are being
killed by his army, they are the terrorists, there is no one else.
The junta has caused the country to spiral into civil war but
Poroshenko ignores this. His nazi brothers can do no wrong, it is the
bogeyman of Russia and the poor bombed civilians who are terrorists.
Nauseating.
"…
Many of you have already felt the "pleasures" of the rule
of terrorists. In addition to pillage and abuse of civilians, they
led the economy of the region, which has already been in crisis
conditions, to the brink of total disaster."
Note
From Author
Dear
reader I challenge anyone to prove one claim against Russia that is
being made by Poroshenko and the junta. Just one. Please show us the
evidence. Of course no one can. There is none.
Continuing
to Blame Yanukovich while Pretending to be Legitimate
Poroshenko
knows he may be seen as an illegitimate leader after the holding of
elections with the country in a state of civil war. In order to add
credibility to himself he claims the recent unconstitutional
elections conducted by the junta in which entire regions of the
country did not take part were legitimate. Of course.
He then
incredibly attempts to blame Russian propaganda for the illegitimacy
of the nazi junta. Of course this is made possible by the US and the
fact that no one is allowed to print or speak the truth in Ukraine
anymore but the disconnect from reality cannot be further. Just like
the junta arranged the snipers on the Maidan in an attempt to blame
president Yanukovich, they continue to attempt to pass the balme to
him even though he is in hiding in Russia. If Poroshenko really wants
peace let him stop the punitive war against his own people right now,
but of course the war criminal can not, he has been bought and paid
for, just another in a series of traitors to Ukraine purchased by the
CIA. Yes Joe Biden we see why you are smiling.
"Nationwide
presidential elections has put a bold cross on the myth of allegedly
illegitimate Kyiv authorities. This myth has been created by Russian
propaganda and clan of Yanukovych who betrayed the Donbas and robbed
it even more than the whole country. He has been inseparably ruling
Donetsk region for 17 years. And now, he is funding terrorists. It is
he who shall be totally responsible for political and socio-economic
situation of the region. For unemployment, for poverty and for
refugees. For killed citizens and for mothers' tears."
False
Claim of Decentralization
For
Poroshenko decentralization obviously means spreading the junta’s
grip away from Kiev. What else could it mean when he still refuses to
reinstate Russian as a state language and refuses to discuss
federalization? Ignoring that the "right" Ukrainians are
killing the "wrong" Ukrainians he continues his "speech".
He makes no note of the fact that Russia will continue to be
demonized in Ukraine and does not touch upon measures initiated by
the junta to prhibit Russian being used in public places in cluding
in doctor's offices, but does hint at who is really controlling the
scenario: the EU.
"With
guarantee of free usage of Russian language in your region. With
strong intention not to divide people into right and wrong
Ukrainians. With respect for the specifics of regions. For the right
of local communities to their peculiarities in the issues of historic
memory, pantheon of heroes, religious traditions. With project on
creation of jobs in the East of Ukraine elaborated jointly with our
partners from the EU before the elections."
Ignoring
Atrocities
Clearly
a sly wink to the Right Sector here. He dares to mention the
patriotism he has seen in Odessa but again fails to mention the over
100 people burned alive and brutally murdered there. Obviously it is
the patriotism of the brutal nazi murderers that he is impressed
with. That message is clear.
"I
am deeply impressed with patriotism of citizens in southern and
eastern regions, from Odessa to Kharkov. Peace has not come yet, but
today we can confidently say that hard challenges united Ukrainian
family. They strengthened us as Ukrainian political nation which is
confident in its European choice. Our people has never been so
strong."
Preparing
the Groundwork for NATO
The
following paragraph must have been written with the help of NATO
propagandists. If you will recall dear reader once Ukraine joins NATO
the country will have to give up at least 8% of its GDP to support
NATO. The country will have to spend billions upon billions of
dollars on "upgrading" and "interoperability"
enhancements and of course the people will have to get used to having
foreign troops in their sold out and occupied country.
To
make all of this possible there has to be a threat. Poroshenko, like
Adolf Hitler is calling for arming, but there is no threat to
Ukraine. Even the implied bogeyman of Russia was not mentioned as the
Ukrainian people would never believe this. They know who the threat
is: Poroshenko and his fascists.
"For
peace to become lasting, we must get used to living in constant
combat readiness. We have to keep the gunpowder dry. Army and its
re-equipment by means of national military-industrial complex is our
top priority. Moreover, state orders for military-industrial
enterprises will give a boost to reindustrialization of the economy.
Those who grudge money for the armed forces feed foreign army. Nobody
will protect us until we learn to defend ourselves."
One
has to ask the question again: Against whom!?!?! However he then
makes it clear and should follow his own advice, as should the brutal
Right Sector and Svoboda fascists: those who live by the sword perish
by the sword. No secret anymore it is right out there. His goal is
enslaving Ukraine to NATO and the EU whether the people want it or
not. Yes Nuland, Kerry, Pyatt, McFaul, Rasmussen, Ashton, and Biden,
you truly do have a reason to smile. Another country is killing its
own people for your worthless dollars and doing your bidding like
mindless sheep.
The
Budapest Memorandum was the key security arrangement with Russia. OF
course that will have to annulled. However there are clauses that
would allow it to be used against the junta itself, if anyone cared
to study it properly.
"I
will use my diplomatic experience to ensure the signature of an
international agreement that would replace the Budapest Memorandum.
Such agreement must provide direct and reliable guarantees of peace
and security - up to military support in case of threat to
territorial integrity. Any aggressor on the border of Ukraine must
remember the saying from the Gospel: for all they that take the sword
shall perish with the sword."
The
New Masters: The EU
More
European rhetoric, however decentralization does not apply to
Donbass. Again the decentralization means spreading the junta’s
control into the regions:
"European
democracy for me is the best form of government invented by mankind.
It is the European choice which tells us that significant part of
powers must be immediately delegated from the center to local
governments. Reform on decentralization will begin this year with
amendments to the Constitution."
Further
Raping of the Economy
Prepare
for Oligarch Poroshenko to take complete control of the economy and
allow him to hoard the wealth because it needs to be "built up"
and of course those funds will go to Europe!
"While
economic management falls within the competence of free market or the
Government, President as a guarantor of the Constitution is obliged
to provide conditions for innovative economy and social justice. Fair
distribution of national wealth is an urgent demand of time. But we
must increase the national wealth before distributing it. Ukraine has
everything to ensure the European prosperity for people."
Yes
Ukrainian people do not think, do not choose your own future. Just
follow the instructions of the EU. Your president has determined your
fate. It is written in the EU agreement, an agreement that will
enslave you forever.
"European
choice of Ukraine - is the heart of our national ideal. It is a
choice made by our ancestors and prophets. And what exactly do we
have to do to live freely, to live comfortably, to live in peace and
security? It is written in the agreement on political association and
free trade area with the EU."
Unbelievable!
Finally:
A Call for Fascists to Unite, the NATO Endgame
The
most chilling aspect of the speech came towards the end and should
have set off alarm bells around the world. Poroshenko finally
vocalizes the real plan of his government and the junta by causally
referring to the failures of previous Ukrainian nationalist and
fascist movements and speaking sentimentally about such figures as
Symon Petliura, the most brutal of the nazi collaborators and what
some call the mentor of Stepan Bandera.
Imagine
if a German politician mentioned the sad arguments between Adolf
Hitler and say Heinrich Held or Benitto Musolini expressing regret at
the demise of the Third Reich. For some reason Biden continued to
smile.
Was
Poroshenko merely playing to his base? Or is he really going to
continue the war on the Ukrainian people started by Svoboda and the
Right Sector?
Apparently he is set on continuing the punitive
military operations. There are some that take issue with the fact
Poroshenko is Jewish, so why would he mention Symon Petliura who was
said to have commanded pogroms against Jews? And if not leading them
then at least condoning them having once said: "… it is a pity
that pogroms take place, but they uphold the discipline of the army.”
Is
that Poroshenko’s belief? Does he believe that the pogroms against
the citizens of Donetsk and Lugansk are okay because they “uphold
discipline.” Or is his approach towards what the junta are calling
“pro-Russian terrorists” more along the lines of Hitler who when
asked what to do with Russian Jews stated “als Partisanen
auszurotten" (exterminate them as partisans). Is Poroshenko of
the belief that the people in the east have to be “exterminated
like terrorists”? It would appear so. Their crime? They are against
being ruled by fascists and labelled as pro-Russian.
“To
implement our ambitious plans, we need not only peace and unity of
the country, but also consolidation of all patriotic, pro-Ukrainian
and pro-European forces. We must always keep in mind the harsh
lessons of the national liberation struggle of the
seventeenth-twenties of the last century. At that time, our
politicians were not able to unite and resist aggression jointly.
Volodymyr Vynnychenko fought against Mykhailo Hrushevskyi, Symon
Petliura fought against Pavlo Skoropadskyi. And Nestor Makhno fought
against all.”
Fascist
neo-Nazi racist parties and grouping in Ukraine like the Right Sector
and Svoboda as well as neo-Nazi groups, proponents of anti-Semitism,
and various far-right racist groups “worldwide” accuse the most
brutal proponents and enablers of the bloodshed in Ukraine, such as
Kolomoisky who is trying to establish his own little Fourth Reich,
Arseny Yatsenyuk who betrayed and sold his country out for personal
gain, Victoria Nuland the key puppet master and Poroshenko of being
Jewish. This is may be a key questions for some in Ukraine but in
reality what we have are forces working in unison, if not those at
the top manipulating radical followers of nazi ideology to bring
about the objectives of US/NATO/EU.
It
would appear that in reality anti-Semitism and neo-nazism in fact
mean nothing when it comes to the goal, dividing the centuries long
brotherhood between the Ukrainian and Russian people and placing NATO
first strike infrastructure in Ukraine. They are just being paid and
the ideological leanings of Yarosh, Poroshenko and the like are most
likely completely irrelevant to the cynical geopolitical planners.
How will the Right Sector react when they realize the are just pawns?
How
are the Jews in Ukraine supposed to believe in leaders who support
forces that call for the hanging of Jews and speak sentimentally of
anti-Semitic monsters who carried out genocide on the Jewish
population of Ukraine? There can be no excuse whatsoever for
unleashing nazis once again in Europe. But Biden smiles.
I
started out by saying Biden and Company have no idea what they are
doing yet finish with a contradiction and leave you with this
thought: perhaps they know exactly what they are doing and are
playing all of the opposing forces in Ukraine for all they are worth
to bring about their goal? Which might better explain Biden’s
smiles and nods, everything is going according to plan in Ukraine,
soon NATO/EU/IMF and their assembled forces will have conquered
another country and enslaved its economy. Although you might say the
8% of GDP that Ukraine will have to pay NATO is not really that much,
they are also taking the energy sector, the economy and everything
else they can get their hands on under control.
The
US military industrial complex and NATO win once again and the people
of Ukraine lose forever in the “fate” that will be signed by
Poroshenko as soon as the document is before him. The same document
that the legal President of Ukraine Victor Yanukovich wanted to study
before it was signed.
The
real patriots of Ukraine are the people who want to breathe free, not
the junta and the oligarchs who have sold the country down river and
are selling Ukrainian sovereignty to the wolves for all eternity.
Russia has never “subjugated” Ukraine, Russia has always
repsected Ukraine’s Sivereignty and treated Ukraine as a brotherly
nation. Anyone who tells you otherwise is misinformed or has another
agenda.
As
the people in the east continue to flee Ukraine and continue to die
at the hands of their own army one might tell the US Vice President:
smile Biden, you deserve it. And Victoria Nuland who just visited
Odessa but did not think it worth her while to lay flowers at, or
visit the House of Unions, where a ceromony was taking place where
her Right Sector and pro-Maidan forces killed what are possibly over
a hundred innocent civilians who were attempting to take part in
their own "democracy" and protesting aginst the junta, you
can keep smiling too. How you are still allowed into a country you
openly subverted is beyond me.
The
views and opinions expressed here are my own. I can be reached at
robles@ruvr.ru.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.