National Nihilism
By Mark HACKARD (USA)
19
June, 2014
Strategies
for full-spectrum
dominance encompass
far more than just military means – their entire point is found in
politics, the struggle for power. Movements proclaiming themselves
the champions of national salvation thus deserve extra scrutiny,
since they might serve precisely the opposite end.
Ever
since a US-backed junta seized control of Ukraine in February, the
country’s ethnic, cultural and linguistic fault lines have been
accentuated to deadly effect.
The predominantly russophone south and
east have already paid a terrible price for resisting the new
liberal-nationalist regime, from a fiery massacre in Odessa to
outright war against Donetsk and Lugansk, two regions bordering
Russia that have declared their independence. Had Vladimir Putin
not moved
to secure Crimea,
the peninsula today would be suffering an analogous fate. When we
consider the atrocities committed against the inhabitants of
historical Novorossiya (New Russia), it must be understood that
Kiev’s counterinsurgency is far more significant than a local
conflict – it is a proxy war the Pax Americana wages against Russia
in order to command the Eurasian heartland.
In
the quest to “contain” and destabilize Russia, Washington has
found willing and eager proxies in Ukrainian nationalists. Longtime
enemies of Moscow, outfits like Stepan
Bandera’s Organization
of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Rebel Army (UPA)
worked in close partnership with Nazi Germany during the Second World
War. With the Reichstag still smoldering and the new Cold War
underway, the United States would continue where the Abwehr and SS
left off, dropping nationalist agents into western Ukraine to conduct
sabotage and guerrilla campaigns against the Soviet government until
the early 1950s. The Berlin Wall may no longer stand, but US/NATO
employment of Ukrainian nationalists in subversion
programs continues
to this day. Aside from the $5 billion the US has openly spent over
twenty years to suborn Ukraine, it stands to reason that substantial
clandestine assets were also dedicated to that end.
Supported
by the CIA as
well as Polish
intelligence,
Kiev has attempted for the past two months to bring the east to heel,
yet the regime has little to show for the effort other than dead and
wounded in the thousands, while towns such as Slavyansk and
Kramatorsk are pulverized under sustained bombardment. The regular
Ukrainian army, demoralized, underfunded and under-equipped, hasn’t
taken to the repression with the revolutionary fervor expected of
them by the junta. Rather, Kiev has relied on the newly-instituted
National Guard, foreign mercenaries and paramilitaries bankrolled by
billionaire oligarchs like Dnepropetrovsk governor Igor
“Benya” Kolomoisky,
an ardent Zionist with a business empire reportedly built on ruthless
criminality. Filling the ranks of these “special battalions” are
motivated but often inexperienced thugs from neo-fascist Right
Sector, the group that played a pivotal role in the success of
February 22nd’s Maidan putsch. The death squads have proven adept
at terrorizing civilians, but they haven’t fared so well in combat
with local resistance forces.
Underlying
the regime’s disastrous attempt to smash the revolt in the east is
the utter incoherence of Ukrainian nationalism. Ukraine as a
nation-state has all the natural viability of Belgium, for it is an
artificial country hopelessly divided within Soviet-era
borders.
Civil war has erupted because ethnic Russians and culturally Russian
Ukrainians, for generations living on traditionally Russian lands,
refuse to accede to a poisonous chauvinism demanding the surrender of
their religious, cultural and linguistic heritage. The armed
ideologues who come to impose “ukrainianization” might as well be
foreign invaders seeking to wipe out a subjugated people’s very
identity, and this is why bands of rebels in the Donbass are fighting
to the knife.
While
far from the only case, the fabricated
nature of
militant Ukrainian nationalism becomes clearer through the lens of
great-power competition. The shaping
of “Ukraine” (originally Malorossia –
Little Russia – plus Galicia and Volynia) as an entity implacably
hostile to “Muscovy” is an ongoing Western geopolitical project
launched in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when Poland and
the Vatican maneuvered to fracture the unity of Orthodox Eastern
Slavdom. From that time and in succession, Austria-Hungary, Germany,
and now the United States have all found fostering and further
inciting this antagonism as an economical means to undermine and even
attack Russia itself. Though foolish and extremely dangerous,
America’s latest bid to incorporate Ukraine into the “free world”
is thus well-founded in historical precedent.
Also
set in historical precedent is US collaboration with fascists. Far
from limited to sponsorship of Pinochet-style military governments in
Latin America, it’s worth recalling that Wall Street actively
financed Adolf
Hitler’s rise to Weltmacht.
And so today the ultra-nationalists of Ukraine enjoy Washington’s
tacit support as they drive to ethnically cleanse the country’s
south and east of Russians and attain a pyrrhic victory for their
ideology. Since Right Sector, Svoboda and other radical parties are
enraptured by the legacy of National Socialism, they would do well to
remember not only its fate, but also its dialectical
function.
The wholesale destruction and dehumanization wrought by Nazism merely
cleared the way for the triumph of international capital, which from
the end of World War II has enforced its dictates through liberal
political economy, cultural Marxism and American military power. As
US President Barack Obama elaborated in a recent
speech in
Warsaw:
We have a solemn duty — a binding treaty obligation — to defend your territorial integrity. And we will. We stand together — now and forever — for your freedom is ours.
A
map of shale gas reserve basins in Ukraine discloses the reason
behind Kiev’s fiery military actions against Novorossia.
The
banksters are at liberty to subvert, invade and expropriate across
the worldforever.
A key condition for the IMF’s extension of its $18
billion loan to
Ukraine is “territorial integrity” – in their war on
Novorossiya, nationalists act as the foot soldiers of predatory
multinationals. They march not for their fatherland, but for the
greater glory of Exxon-Mobil, Monsanto,
and Lady Gaga; they are expendable, and so is Ukraine. Fantasies of
a state from the Carpathians to the Caucasus seem quaint compared to
the vision of planetary rule decreed by the masters of the dialectic,
and the parochial nihilism of
Bandera’s disciples represents only a transitory stage toward
universal enslavement and the dissolution of all peoples.
Globalist
elites design their policies according to the classical maxim
of divide
et impera,
yet its esoteric corollary is solve
et coagula,
the alchemical process applied to entire societies. Behind
inane sloganeering on freedom, democracy and human rights lies a
relentless desire to destroy. Sovereignty must be ended, sex and the
family distorted unto grotesquery, and God usurped by Mammon. The
nation – the great extended family – must be annihilated. What
the Brave New World needs are neither Russians nor Ukrainians, but
demographic biomass engineered for exploitation.
Ukraine’s
tragedy provides us a ready example of nationalism manipulated for
the benefit of internationalist oligarchs. And Russia must meet its
own challenge of upholding traditional identity against the onslaught
of the West’s postmodern imperium. The organic, tribal nationalism
of the blood can be reconciled with the higher demands of the spirit;
such has been the mission of the Church
and state in
forming a wider Russian Orthodox civilization. In the meantime, the
mounting outrages and provocations of the Kiev junta are catalogued
for the sake of justice – to be meted out at a time of the
Kremlin’s choosing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.