After abrupt climate change assuredly the #2 extinction event.
Record
radiation at Fukushima power plant could kill person in under 1 hour
– reports
RT,
31
October, 2015
Deadly
radiation levels of up to 9.4 Sieverts per hour have been recorded at
the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant – enough to kill a person
in less than an hour if directly exposed, local media reports.
The mortal radiation reading was taken in a small room, using a remote-controlled robot, where a pipe leads to the containment vessel of the No. 2 reactor at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, JIJI Press reported, citing Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO).
#Fukushima reactor could have suffered total meltdown – report http://on.rt.com/6sa9
The
reading of 9.4 sieverts (Sv) per hour was taken during the September
4-25 checks. According to the operator, the highest levels of
contamination were measured on the floor. TEPCO did not offer any
further details. The company will start the decontamination process
that it hopes to complete by December.
Immediate radiation exposure around the Fukushima nuclear power following the deadly incident reached 400 millisieverts (mSv) per hour in places. One millisievert is a thousandth of a sievert, therefore the new 9.4 Sv reading is 23.5 times higher than the radiation level recorded in March, 2011.
Just to compare, the typical average dose for a person is about 0.0036 Sv. per year. Combined career exposure limits for NASA's male astronauts by the time they are 55 years old is 4.00 Sv.
Immediate radiation exposure around the Fukushima nuclear power following the deadly incident reached 400 millisieverts (mSv) per hour in places. One millisievert is a thousandth of a sievert, therefore the new 9.4 Sv reading is 23.5 times higher than the radiation level recorded in March, 2011.
Just to compare, the typical average dose for a person is about 0.0036 Sv. per year. Combined career exposure limits for NASA's male astronauts by the time they are 55 years old is 4.00 Sv.
Earlier
this week, a government commissioned study, said that nearly 40
percent of those involved in the emergency assistance operation at
the Fukushima plant in March 2011 suffered radiation exposure
exceeding the yearly public norm.
A
magnitude 9 earthquake triggered a tsunami that struck Fukushima on
March 11, 2011. The disaster caused a triple meltdown at the nuclear
plant, where so far almost 45,000 workers have been involved in a
clean-up and decommissioning effort that is expected to cost billions
of dollars and take about 40 years.
SURPRISE!
You're Eating Fukushima Radiation; Bloody Cancerous Tumors in Fish &
Seafood
31
October, 2015
Americans
and Canadians have been eating radioactive fish filled with bloody,
cancerous tumors, as a result of contamination with radiation in the
Pacific ocean from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.
In
March, 2011 an earthquake off the coast of Japan caused a Tsunami
which
hit
the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, causing three reactors to melt
down and explode.
This
is what the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in Japan looked like Before
/ After the explosions and Meltdowns.
BEFORE
As you may notice in the images above, the Fukushima Daichi Power Plant is located on the coastline of Japan. Like all coastlines, the ground slopes toward the ocean. This created a problem that the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) didn't tell anyone about until a full YEAR after the disaster took place:
Ground
water, flowing from inland, was seeping beneath the blown-up rectors,
coming into contact with the melted-down reactor cores, becoming
highly radioactive, then flowing into the Pacific Ocean.
300 Ton of this radioactive water has been seeping into the Pacific
Ocean EVERY
DAY since
March 15, 2011. Nothing has stopped it and the flow continues to this
very day, October 31, 2015. Here's how it is taking place:
TEPCO
wanted to build a "freeze wall" (shown in the graphic
above) to freeze the ground and the water, to stop the flow.
They tried. They failed. The radiation and heat coming
from the melted down reactor cores - which melted through the reactor
and melted into the ground - is making the water too hot. They
can't freeze it. There is no "wall" to stop the flow!
The
flow of radioactive water into the Pacific is contaminating and
killing sea life. Fish caught locally near the power plant and out in
the deep sea, have all tested positive for radiation
contamination. Other fish, Shrimp, clams and such, caught
hundreds of miles offshore, have also tested 100% positive for
radiation contamination. In fact, of 15 Blue-Fin Tuna caught off the
coast of California, 100% tested positive for radioactive substances!
Hundreds-of-thousands
of these sea creatures have already died from the radiation and
millions more are sick and dying to this day. People
who consume this seafood are ALSO getting contaminated by radiation.
The
prevailing ocean currents off the east coast of Japan are well
documented by Oceanographers. Here is what the prevailing ocean
currents look like:
Generally
speaking, two surface currents — one from the south, called the
Kuroshio, and one from the north, called the Oyashio — meet just
off the coast of Japan at about 40 degrees north latitude. The
currents merge to form the North Pacific current and surge eastward.
Fukushima lies at 37 degrees north latitude. Thousands of miles
later, the currents hit an upwelling just off the western coast of
the United States and split. One, the Alaska current, turns north up
the coast toward British Columbia and Southeast Alaska. The other,
the California current, turns south and heads down the western
seaboard of the U.S. These currents are spreading the radioactive
material from Japan.
As
of June, 2015, the radiation in the Pacific Ocean reached the US West
Coast; the
seafood you've been eating from the Pacific ocean is loaded with
Cesium-137 and Strontium-90. Both radioactive. Strontium-90
mimics calcium. It ends up getting deposited in human bones,
where the radiation wreaks havoc with bone marrow, causing bone
cancers and blood cancers like Leukemia.
The
radiation in the fish is so terrible that wild-caught Alaskan Salmon,
Pacific Herring and Canadian white fish are being found bloody, with
cancerous tumors throughout their bodies.
The
migration patterns of Pacific salmon explains why. The graphic below
shows the migration patterns of Salmon:
In
a nutshell, Salmon ride the Alaska current and follow its curve past
Sitka, Yakutat, Kodiak and the Aleutian Islands. Most often, it’s
the Chinook, Coho and Sockeye Salmon migration patterns that range
farthest. Chum and Pink Salmon seem to stay closer to home.
Regardless of how far out each salmon species ventures into the
Pacific, each fish hitches a ride back to its home rivers and
spawning grounds on the North Pacific current, the same one
pulling the Fukushima radioactive materials eastward.
We
all know too much exposure to nuclear waste can cause cancer. And
many understand that certain chemicals, such as cesium-137 and
strontium-90, contained in said waste products can accumulate in fish
by being deposited in bones and muscle permanently.
Alaska
salmon as well as all types of Pacific seafood (Shrimp, clams,
scallops, squid, etc.) are being tainted with radioactive
contamination. So
are the people who consume them.
What do you think happens to people who eat radiation-contaminated
food? Worse, what happens to people who eat cancerous tumors without
knowing what they are?
The
government and the nuclear power industry claim we have nothing to
worry about. When you see the photos below, you may want decide
for yourself if they're telling the truth.
According
to the Local Environmental Observers (LEO) Network in Hydaburg,
Alaska, they have found strange growths in the flesh or meat of
salmon. "We were fishing for Cohos (silver salmon) at the mouth
of the Hydaburg River with line and reel." said Brian Holter,
Jr. who said that eight fish were filled up inside with strange
growths that were either white or pink in color. "On the outside
the fish looked fine. The growths looked kind of like individual
little salmon eggs, and about the same size. their people were seeing
the same kind of growths in their fish as well." he continued.
This is what the tumors inside three separate Salmon looked like:
Cancerous
Tumors in Salmon
The
map below will give readers an understanding of the proximity of
Hydaburg, Alaska to the Fukushima, Japan disaster site, to
demonstrate how far the effects of Fukushima radiation have traveled
in the four years since the disaster began:
Other
volunteers from LEO have come across even more disturbing cancerous
tumors and bloody lesions on fish. According to another LEO
volunteer, Sam Kunaknana, in Nuiqsut, Alaska, for the past few months
they have been catching sick fish on Nigliq Channel and upstream from
Nigliq Channel to the Colville River. The fish have had bloody
lesions and tumors on them.
Sadly,
the images above aren't nearly the worst of it. Other fishermen and
even Marine Biologists have caught other fish showing classic signs
of radiation-caused cancerous tumors. "In all the years I’ve
been fishing I never caught any fish like this. Caught 3 more sick
fish with same markings and this time one had some kind of growths
coming out from its mouth. Most people in our community eat this
fish." Sam Kunaknana continued.
While
there is no way to tell exactly where in the Pacific Ocean these fish
have been, one thing is for certain - they're ALL from the Pacific
Ocean. Yet numerous "scientists" have repeatedly stated
that "dilution is the solution" for the Fukushima
pollution. These "scientists" say the Pacific Ocean is so
big and has so much water, the radiation spewing from Fukushima can't
possibly be bad enough to affect humans. The pictures in this story
seem to prove those "scientists" wrong.
Certainly,
the Pacific Ocean is huge. Yet as the map above shows, distance from
Fukushima did not seem to matter with the fish caught near Hydaburg,
Alaska.
The
map below, shows the location of the other LEO volunteer, Sam
Kunaknana, in Nuiqsut, Alaska, thousands of miles farther away from
Fukushima than Hyanburg. In fact, Nuiqsut, Alaska is about as far
north as one can get from Fukushima, but the radiation has gotten
there too. Nuiqsut,
AK Map:
We've
all heard for years that sharks don't get cancer. Well, when they
swim around the Pacific Ocean nowadays, the radiation is so terrible
that even sharks are getting cancer! Recently,
researchers in Australia noticed a large tumor protruding from the
mouth of a great white shark, as well as another mass on the head of
a bronze whaler shark. The tumor on the Great White was a historic
first.
The
great white's tumor measured 1 foot (30 centimeters) long and 1 foot
wide, according to a study describing the tumors published online in
the Journal of Fish Diseases. "This was a very unusual sight
as we
have never before seen a white shark with tumors,"
said Rachel Robbins, a study co-author and shark biologist at the Fox
Shark Research Foundation, near Adelaide, in southern Australia.
In
another historic first, this Coral fish from the Great Barrier Reef
in Australia has been found with . . . skin cancer along its head and
face; exactly the type which affects . . . humans!
The only explanation
for a fish getting human-like skin cancer is exposure to radiation.
It's
not just fish that are showing the effects of radiation poisoning.
Other creatures in the sea AND on land, are showing the signs as
well.
Star
Fish - are supposed to have FIVE legs. The shape of a star.
Look what radiation did to this one:
According
to the Journal of Wildlife Diseases, scientists from United States
Geological Survey (USGS) and Alaska Department of Fish & Game,
Jan 2015: Alopecia (hair
loss) has
been observed in several marine mammal species… From 2012, we
observed an alopecia syndrome in polar bears from the southern
Beaufort Sea of Alaska that presented as bilaterally asymmetrical
loss of guard hairs and thinning of the undercoat around the head,
neck, and shoulders, which, in severe cases, was accompanied
by exudation
and crusted skin lesions.
Alopecia was observed in 49 (3.45%) of the bears sampled during 1,421
captures [peaking in] 2012 (28%)
Some
have said that there are explanations other than radiation for these
ailments. Certainly that might be worthy of consideration. Yet, how
many of these so called "ailments" can cross-species? It
is not just fish being affected. Mammals are, too. Fish,
Seals, Walruses and even Polar Bears; ALL of them are suffering
bloody lesions, some suffering external tumors and others are losing
their fur - hair loss is one of the first signs of radiation
poisoning, even in humans.
US
GOVERNMENT HAS DONE -- NOTHING
The
'federal government' of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has done
absolutely NOTHING to test for radiation in the Pacific Ocean.
Nothing.
Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service confirm they "have not tested for radiation and have no
plans to do so in the future."
A
FOIA request encompassing the entire Department of the Interior, via
the Office of the Secretary, resulted in being told "The office
of the Secretary does not have any records relating to your request."
The
Federal Aviation Administration FOIA response was "FAA is not
involved."
The
FOIA response from the Nuclear Regulatory Agency was "NRC does
not conduct the types of tests in your FOIA request."
The
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) replied "We do not
conduct such tests."
The
Environmental Protection Agency replied, "Please understand that
these reports take time to create. Report 154 is currently under
review at our laboratory and will be published once the review is
complete." (That report is over a year old and they still
haven't reviewed it yet???)
The
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) replied
they want $7,098.84 to fill the request. Their charges are as
follows:
Action
Officer
|
Estimated
number of hours
|
Hourly
Salary
|
Benefits
@16%
|
Hourly
Cost
|
Total
Cost
|
Senior
Scientist 40 = 38
|
38
|
$74.47
|
$11.92
|
$86.39
|
$3,282.82
|
Senior
Scientist
|
20
|
$81.10
|
$12.98
|
$94.08
|
$1,881.60
|
Senior
Scientist
|
4
|
$81.03
|
$12.97
|
$94.00
|
$376.00
|
Senior
Professional
|
2
|
$67.66
|
$10.83
|
$78.49
|
$156.98
|
Senior
Professional
|
16
|
$75.51
|
$12.08
|
$87.59
|
$1,401.44
|
80
|
$7,098.84
|
So,
there you have it. For four+ years, the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
disaster has been spewing deadly radioactive material into the
Pacific Ocean and for three years, the agencies above have done
nothing. Without admitting they have done nothing, NOAA wants
$7,098.84 tomerely
LOOK to see if
they have any records relating to a request! In the meantime, fish
from the Pacific Ocean are contaminated with -- and dying from --
Fukushima radiation and that means the radiation is in the seafood
that YOU, your family, maybe even your cats and dogs are eating.
The
next time you hear anyone from 'government' say "We have no
reason to believe there is any radiation hazard" bear in mind it
is because they
are not testing for it.
That's why they have no information . . . . . and . . . .
conveniently . . . . "no reason to believe" there is any
danger.
Yet
government did take -some- action with respect to radiation;
they raised the definition of "safe" exposure!
Yes, you read that correctly.
A nearly 1000-fold increase for exposure to strontium-90;
A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for exposure to iodine-131; and
An almost 25,000 rise for exposure to radioactive nickel-63.
The new radiation guidelines would also allow long-term cleanup thresholds thousands of times more lax than anything EPA has ever judged safe in the past.
Indeed,
some government scientists and media shills are now “reexamining”
old studies that show that radioactive substances like plutonium
cause cancer to argue that they help preventcancer.
It
is not just bubbleheads like Ann
Coulter saying
this. Government scientists from the Pacific
Northwest National Laboratories and pro-nuclear
hacks like Lawrence
Solomon are
saying this.
In
other words, this is a concerted propaganda campaign to cover up the
severity of a major nuclear accident by raising acceptable levels of
radiation and saying that a little radiation is good for us.
As
of October 30, 2015, (yesterday) the Japan
Times reported
that the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has detected radiation
at 9.4 Sieverts outside Reactor containment vessel #2. This
amount of radiation is absolutely
deadly to anyone exposed for 45 minutes.
This latest development has scuttled TEPCO's plans to decommission
what's left of that exploded reactor because no one can be near
enough to it to disassemble the wreckage.
If
this situation wasn't so pathetic, it would be laughable. Folks on
the west coast of North America might want to consider their outdoor
activities. If YOU go swimming in the same water these fish swam in,
YOU could come out looking like they look! As for everyone else,
head-on-out to your local supermarket or restaurant and eat-up! The
"government' says it's safe and they _never_ lie!
Thank You for this article. It confirms what I suspect would happen over time.
ReplyDelete