Having created the problem the US decides to keep Syrians out.
House votes for bill making Syrian refugee admission almost impossible
The
US House of Representatives has voted on a bill that sharply
increases the security screening of Syrian and Iraqi refugees,
effectively blocking President Barack Obama's refugee settlement
plan.
The
final vote was 289 in favor, with 137 opposed. Some 48 Democrats, a
quarter of the party’s representatives in the House, broke ranks
and voted in favor of the bill. Only three Republicans were against.
Following
the terrorist attacks in Paris, opposition to hosting Syrian refugees
in the US has grown in many states. The US was planning to receive
30,000 refugees from Syria in 2016, after hundreds of thousands
flooded Europe this summer. Now 31 states say they would
put a halt on their resettlement or even stop it completely, citing
terror concerns.
The
floor debate was divided along party lines, with Republicans arguing
it was a measure to protect the US from Islamic State militants who
might be infiltrating among the Syrian refugees, and Democrats
blasting it as a xenophobic attack on President Obama’s refugee
policy.
The
bill ensured that a “benevolent
safe haven in America is not used by terrorists to murder
Americans,” said
California Republican Dana Rohrabacher.
“ISIS
cannot incapacitate US security leaders – this bill does,” by
requiring the heads of US intelligence and security agencies to
personally sign off on every refugee’s security evaluation, said
California Democrat Brad Sherman.
As
the House voted on a proposed amendment to the bill, Speaker Paul
Ryan (R-Wisconsin) held a press briefing.
Evaluating
refugees so that something like Paris does not happen in the US “is
just common sense,” Ryan
told reporters, adding, “We're
a compassionate nation. We don’t have to pick among our values.”
Protecting
the American homeland is not a partisan issue, Ryan said, noting that
input from the Democrats was included in the GOP-proposed HR 4038,
and that President Obama's threat of a veto "baffled" him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.