Comments
from Mike Ruppert -
Forget
about 10 years. What is happening at Fukushima now is an
out-of-control and worsening situation in which we have three China
Syndromes underway, TEPCO is rapidly losing all ability to even
mitigate the crisis and has admitted to being overwhelmed. We can
expect one or more imminent uncontrolled chain reactions taking place
in the open atmosphere which will release inconceivable amounts of
radiation from MOX fuel directly into the atmosphere or environment.
We can anticipate that soon the fuel storage vessels in #3 and #4 to
be compromised. Soon the unbelievably contaminated ground water will
be seeping from the surface... The list of catastrophic failures
grows by the day.
In
these cases, the west coast could become uninhabitable within 10
weeks, not ten years. These projections are based upon an assumption
of maintenance of containment levels that are stable or improving.
They are not based upon what we absolutely know are containment
structures that have failed catastrophically as evidenced by the fact
that radiation levels are as high or higher that 2011, increasing,
and in which radiation outside the plant is higher than inside the
reactor buildings themselves.
Add
to that the fact that radiation levels increase the deeper one digs
into the soil and water table and you have incontrovertible evidence
that the cores have melted deep into the ground. The radiation gets
hotter, deeper, because it's getting closer to where the cores are.
Three
China Syndromes.
Radiation
On West Coast of North America Could End Up Being 10 Times HIGHER
than in Japan
16
July, 2013
We’ve
extensively documented the fact that ocean currents bring Japanese
radiation to the West Coast of North America, and that – rather
than adequate ocean dilution - there
could be “pockets” and “streams” of highly-concentrated
radiation.
Joke
F Lübbecke of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA) Pacific
Marine Environmental Laboratory and
3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences
poured tracer dye into coastal waters off of Fukushima, and monitored
its progress as it traveled to the West Coast of North America, to
find out what might really happen.
They
have revealed their results in a new
paper published
by journal Environmental
Research Letters.
The
paper shows that the West Coast of North American could end up
with 10
times more radioactive cesium 137
than the coastal waters off of Japan itself.
How
could radiation levels be lower closer to the source of
contamination: Fukushima?
Because
the currents are swift off of the Eastern coast of Japan, and quickly
move the contaminated water away.
The
paper explains:
In the following years, the tracer cloud continuously expands laterally, with maximum concentrations in its central part heading east. While the northern portion is gradually invading the Bering Sea, the main tracer patch reaches the coastal waters of North America after 5–6 years, with maximum relative concentrations ( > 1 × 10−4) covering a broad swath of the eastern North Pacific between Vancouver Island and Baja California. Simultaneously some fraction of the southern rim of the tracer cloud becomes entrained in the North Equatorial Current (NEC), resulting in a westward extending wedge around 20°N that skirts the northern shores of the Hawaiian Archipelago. After 10 years the concentrations become nearly homogeneous over the whole Pacific, with higher values in the east, extending along the North American coast with a maximum (~1 × 10−4) off Baja California. The southern portion of the tracer cloud is carried westward by the NEC across the subtropical Pacific, leading to increasing concentrations in the Kuroshio regime again.
***
With caution given to the various idealizations (unknown actual oceanic state during release, unknown release area, no biological effects included, see section 3.4), the following conclusions may be drawn. (i) Dilution due to swift horizontal and vertical dispersion in the vicinity of the energetic Kuroshio regime leads to a rapid decrease of radioactivity levels during the first 2 years, with a decline of near-surface peak concentrations to values around 10 Bq m−3 (based on a total input of 10 PBq). The strong lateral dispersion, related to the vigorous eddy fields in the mid-latitude western Pacific, appears significantly under-estimated in the non-eddying (0.5°) model version. (ii) The subsequent pace of dilution is strongly reduced, owing to the eastward advection of the main tracer cloud towards the much less energetic areas of the central and eastern North Pacific. (iii) The magnitude of additional peak radioactivity should drop to values comparable to the pre-Fukushima levels after 6–9 years (i.e. total peak concentrations would then have declined below twice pre-Fukushima levels). (iv) By then the tracer cloud will span almost the entire North Pacific, with peak concentrations off the North American coast an order-of-magnitude higher than in the western Pacific.
“Order-of-magnitude”
is a scientific term which means 10
times higher.
The “Western Pacific” means Japan’s East Coast.
Here
are some of the important graphics from the paper:
Figure 4. Decadal evolution of relative surface tracer concentration in the 0.1°-model simulation; boxes in (d) indicate regions for which the temporal evolution is computed in figure 7; contour lines mark power of 10 intervals.
Figure 7. Temporal evolution of absolute peak concentrations (in Bq m−3, logarithmic scale; grey shaded) and within individual regions (see figure 4(d)) from the 0.1°-model simulation, assuming a total input of 10 PBq of 137Cs. Regions: western Pacific (I, black), off North America (II, green), Hawaii Islands (III, light blue), off Baja California (IV, blue), Aleutian Islands (V, red). The inset is a zoom into the part of the figure with levels below 2 Bq m−3 (pre-Fukushima values) on a linear scale.
Postscript:
Prussian Blue may be used to treat
cesium poisoning.
But don’t take any Prussian Blue before consulting with a qualified
healthcare professional. Antioxidants may also help
reduce damage from low-level radiation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.