Sixth
U.S. ship now in eastern Mediterranean 'as precaution'
A
sixth U.S. warship is now operating in the eastern Mediterranean,
near five U.S. destroyers armed with cruise missiles that could soon
be directed against Syria as part of a "limited, precise"
strike, defense officials said late on Friday.
30
August, 2013
They
stressed that the USS San Antonio, an amphibious ship with several
hundred U.S. Marines on board, was in the region for a different
reason and there were no plans to put Marines on the ground as part
of any military action against Syria.
One
of the officials said the San Antonio's passage into the
Mediterranean was long-planned, but officials thought it prudent to
keep the ship in the eastern Mediterranean near the destroyers given
the current situation.
"It's
been kept there as a precaution," said one of the officials, who
was not authorized to speak publicly.
The
San Antonio transited through the Suez Canal on Thursday from the Red
Sea, and received new orders on Friday to remain in the eastern
Mediterranean, near the destroyers, according to defense officials.
It is one of three ships that are carrying 2,200 Marines who have
been on a six-month deployment in the region around the Arabian
peninsula.
The
Obama administration released evidence on Friday that it said
demonstrated the Syrian government had used chemical weapons against
civilians. It made clear on Friday that it would punish Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad for the "brutal and flagrant"
attack that it says killed more than 1,400 people in Damascus last
week.
Officials
cautioned the operation under discussion involved a limited, precise
set of targets that would be of a short duration, unlike the broader
campaign against Libya in March 2011.
The
U.S. Navy generally keeps three destroyers in the Mediterranean, but
kept two additional destroyers there at the end of their deployments
as the situation evolved in Syria over the past week.
The
five destroyers are each carrying an estimated three dozen or more
Tomahawk missiles for a combined total of about 200 missiles,
according to defense officials.
Byron
Callan, analyst with Capital Alpha Partners, projected that a limited
Syrian strike would use about 200 to 300 Tomahawk missiles, compared
to about 221 used in the Libya operation.
Defense
officials said a more narrowly targeted operation against Syria could
involve even less missiles.
They
cited a debate within the Obama administration about striking the
right balance between a limited cruise missile attack aimed at
delivering a message about chemical weapons, and a broader attack
that could be seen as a strong insertion of the United States into
the Syrian civil war.
Military
and civilian officials have expressed the need for caution to avert a
cascading military conflict that could have repercussions throughout
the region. Some officials have cautioned that even an attack on
military helicopters could be seen as part of a U.S. campaign to
disable the Syrian military.
Retired
Admiral Gary Roughead, who served as chief of naval operations during
the 2011 strikes on Libya, said any strike on Syria would have to be
targeted precisely to do the maximum amount of damage to Syrian
military headquarters and other key sites - and to avert the
possibility of retaliatory action.
"If
you're going to try to shape events, you really need to hurt them,"
said Roughead, now a visiting fellow at Stanford University's Hoover
Institution. "You would have to do something that would diminish
the effectiveness of the Syrian military and that would be their
command and control, perhaps their leadership, and then their ability
to control air space."
Russia
sends warships to Syria
Russia
is sending two warships to the eastern Mediterranean, which includes
Syria’s coast, including a large anti-submarine ship and a powerful
missile cruiser in the “coming days.”
30
August, 2013
Reuters
reports Moscow as saying the move is a routine one, but the fact that
the missile cruiser RFS Moskva was in the Atlantic and has been
deployed to the Mediterranean makes it appear more likely that the
move is aimed at countering similar moves by Western navies.
Reuters
quoted a Russian source saying:
"The
well-known situation now in the eastern Mediterranean required us to
make some adjustments to the naval force.”
Another
Reuters report quoted defence experts saying the two ships in
question could give the Assad regime — supported in many ways by
Russia — early warning of cruise missile launches, especially if
launched from submarines or the newly-arriving ships could jam radars
or navigation systems of Western ships.
Lee
Willett, editor of the respected journal, IHS Jane's Navy
International, said:
"What
we may be seeing here is an example of gunboat diplomacy rather than
a deliberate attempt to interfere directly in any coalition strike
militarily. The simple presence of any ships will have an impact
politically, and that is the primary intent."
Russia
is already reported to have 16 warships and three ship-based
helicopters in the Mediterranean. This will be increased by at least
two, on board the Moskva.
The
report says the Russian deployment in June is the first permanent
deployment to the Mediterranean by the country since the Cold War.
Sky
News, meanwhile, says the US has now deployed up to five missile
cruisers into the Mediterranean, the last one being the USS Stout.
The USS Mahan was expected to be withdrawn, but with the current
crisis, may well remain in the region.
Both
US warships are Arleigh Burke class missile destroyers and are
approximately equivalent to the Russian Moskva missile cruiser.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.