According to Radio NZ the NZ fishing industry refused to submit samples for testing.
Is Fukushima Radiation Contaminating Tuna, Salmon and Herring On the West Coast of North America?
Is Fukushima Radiation Contaminating Tuna, Salmon and Herring On the West Coast of North America?
26
August, 2013
Demand
that Fish Be Tested for Radiation
More
than a year ago, 15
out of 15 bluefin tuna
tested in California waters were contaminated with radioactive cesium
from Fukushima.
Bluefin
tuna are a wide-ranging
fish,
which can swim back and forth between Japan and North America in a
year.
But
what about other types of fish?
Sockeye
salmon also have a range spanning all of the way from Japan to
Alaska, Canada, Washington and Oregon:
Associated Press reports that both scientists and native elders in British Columbia say that sockeye numbers have plummeted:
Sockeye
salmon returns plunge to historic lows.
***
Last
month, [the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] noted returns for the
Skeena River sockeye run were dire.
[Mel
Kotyk, North Coast area director for the Department] said department
scientists don’t know why the return numbers are so low…. “When
they went out to sea they seemed to be very strong and healthy and in
good numbers, so we think something happened in the ocean.”
***
“We’ve
never seen anything like this in all these years I’ve done this.
I’ve asked the elders and they have never seen anything like this
at all.” [said Chief Wilf Adam]
“The
sockeye runs way up north in the Skeena are low. The [fish] out of
Bristol Bay, Alaska is down 30 to 35 per cent over last year. Russia
has got a limited number of fish in the market. They are down about
40 per cent over all their salmon fisheries.”
We
are concerned this hazardous material is hitching a ride on marine
life and making its way to Alaska.
Currents
of the world’s oceans are complex. But, generally speaking, two
surface currents — one from the south, called the Kuroshio, and one
from the north, called the Oyashio — meet just off the coast of
Japan at about 40 degrees north latitude. The currents merge to form
the North Pacific current and surge eastward. Fukushima lies at 37
degrees north latitude. Thousands of miles later, the currents hit an
upwelling just off the western coast of the United States and split.
One, the Alaska current, turns north up the coast toward British
Columbia and Southeast Alaska. The other, the California current,
turns south and heads down the western seaboard of the U.S.
The
migration patterns of Pacific salmon should also be taken into
consideration. In a nutshell, our salmon ride the Alaska current and
follow its curve past Sitka, Yakutat, Kodiak and the Aleutian
Islands. Most often, it’s the chinook, coho and sockeye salmon
migration patterns that range farthest. Chum and pink salmon seem to
stay closer to home. Regardless of how far out each salmon species
ventures into the Pacific, each
fish hitches a ride back to its home rivers and spawning grounds on
the North Pacific current, the same one pulling the nuclear waste
eastward.
We
all know too much exposure to nuclear waste can cause cancer. And
many understand that certain chemicals, such as cesium-137 and
strontium-9, contained in said waste products can accumulate in fish
by being deposited in bones and muscle permanently.
We
are concerned our Alaska salmon are being slowly tainted with nuclear
waste. We are worried about the impact this waste could have on our
resources, and especially the people who consume them.
***
We
urge scientists in Alaska to be proactive about conducting research
and monitoring our salmon species.
Similarly,
the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reports
that salmon are migrating through the radioactive plume, but Canadian
authorities aren’t testing the fish:
[Award-winning
physician and preventative health expert Dr. Erica Frank, MD, MPH]:
There are Pacific wild salmon that migrate through the radioactive
plumes that have been coming off of Fukushima. Then those fish come
back to our shores and we catch them.
CBC
Reporter: The Canada Food Inspection Agency says it now relies
on Japan for test results concerning radiation.
Another
example – pacific herring – is even more dramatic.
Pacific herring is wide-ranging fish, spanning all the way from Japan
to Southern California:
Every single pacific herring examined by a biologist in Canada was found to be hemorrhaging blood. As Ene News reports:
Independent
fisheries scientist Alexandra
Morton
is raising concerns about a disease she says is spreading through
Pacific herring causing
fish to hemorrhage.
[...] “Two days ago I did a beach seine on Malcolm Island [near
Port McNeill on northern Vancouver Island] and I got approximately
100 of these little herring and they were not
only bleeding from their fins, but their bellies, their chins, their
eyeballs.
[...] “It was 100
per cent … I couldn’t find any that weren’t bleeding to some
degree.
And they were schooling
with young sockeye
[salmon]”
Sun
News,
Aug 12, 2013:
[Morton]
dragged up several hundred of the fish this past weekend and found
the apparent infection had spread – instead of their usual silver
colour the fish had eyes, tails, underbellies, gills and faces
plastered with the sickly red colour.
“I have never
seen fish that looked this bad,”
[...] In June, the affected fish were only found in eastern Johnstone
Strait, but have since spread to Alert Bay and Sointula, she said.
Canada.com,
Aug 16, 2013:
Morton
[...] pulled up a net of about 100 herring near Sointula and found
they were all bleeding. “It was pretty shocking
to see,” said Morton [...] Herring
school with small sockeye
salmon
and are also eaten by chinook and coho.
‘Response’
from Canadian Government
Vancouver
24 hrs,
Aug 11, 2013:
[Morton]
says Fisheries and Oceans Canada [FOC] is ignoring
the problem.
[...] According to emails from FOC, the federal authority had asked
the marine biologist to send in 20 to 30 herring in September
2011,
saying that would be “more than sufficient for the lab to look for
clinical signs of disease and provide sufficient diagnostics.” She
did, and hasn’t
heard back since.
[...] FOC
officials did not respond to a request for comment
by the 24 hours presstime.
Canada.com,
Aug 16, 2013:
Fisheries
and Oceans Canada is trying
to confirm reports from an independent biologist that herring around
northern Vancouver Island have a disease that is causing bleeding
from their gills, bellies and eyeballs. [...] Arlene Tompkins of
DFO’s [Department of Fisheries and Oceans'] salmon assessment
section said staff in the Port Hardy area have
not found bleeding herring.
“We
are trying to retrieve samples,
but [Monday] we were not
successful because of heavy fog,”
she said. “We
haven’t had any other reports of fish kills or die-offs
[see salmon report below].” Tompkins has seen photographs provided
by Morton [...]
There
have been many
other reports
of mysterious sickness among West Coast North American sealife.
For example, sea lions’ main
food is herring:
Sea
lions will eat a lot of different prey items: octopus, squid, small
sharks. But their
bread and butter is herring
….
Given
that pacific herring are suffering severe disease, it is worth asking
whether the “unusual
mortality event”
of Southern California sea lions is connected.
The
bottom line – as nuclear experts said 4
days
after the Japanese earthquake and tsunami – is that we all need to
demand that fish be tested for radiation.
Postscript:
Apologists for reckless nuclear policy claim that low-level radiation
is safe. Scientists have thoroughly
debunked those claims.
Radioactive
Bluefin Tuna Caught Off California Coast
Every
bluefin tuna tested in the waters off California has shown to be
contaminated with radiation that originated in Fukushima. Every
single one.
24
August, 2013
Over
a year ago, in May of 2012, the Wall
Street Journal reported on a Stanford University study. Daniel
Madigan, a marine ecologist who led the study, was quoted as saying,
“The tuna packaged it up (the radiation) and brought it across the
world’s largest ocean. We were definitely surprised to see it at
all and even more surprised to see it in every one we measured.”
Another
member of the study group, Marine biologist Nicholas Fisher at Stony
Brook University in New York State reported, “We found that
absolutely every one of them had comparable concentrations of cesium
134 and cesium 137.”
That
was over a year ago. The fish that were tested had relatively little
exposure to the radioactive waste being dumped into the ocean
following the nuclear melt-through
that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in March of 2011. Since
that time, the flow of radioactive contaminants dumping into the
ocean has continued unabated. Fish arriving at this juncture have
been swimming in contaminants for all of their lives.
Radioactive
cesium doesn’t sink to the sea floor, so fish swim through it and
ingest it through their gills or by eating organisms that have
already ingested it. It is a compound that does occur naturally in
nature, however, the levels of cesium found in the tuna in 2012 had
levels 3 percent higher than is usual. Measurements for this year
haven’t been made available, or at least none that I have been able
to find. I went looking for the effects of ingesting cesium.
This is what I found:
When
contact with radioactive cesium occurs, which is highly unlikely, a
person can experience cell damage due to radiation of the cesium
particles. Due to this, effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea
and bleeding may occur. When the exposure lasts a long time, people
may even lose consciousness. Coma or even death may then follow. How
serious the effects are depends upon the resistance of individual
persons and the duration of exposure and the concentration a person
is exposed to.
The
half life of
cesium 134 is 2.0652 years. For cesium 137, the half life is 30.17
years.
The
Fukushima disaster is an ongoing battle with no signs that humans are
gaining the upper hand. The only good news to come out of Japan has
later been proven to be false and was nothing more than attempts by
Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to mislead the public and lull
them into a sense of security while the company searched vainly for
ways to contain the accident. This incident makes Three Mile Island
and Chernobyl pale in comparison. Those were nuclear meltdowns. A
nuclear melt-through
poses a much more serious problem and is one that modern technology
doesn’t have the tools to address. Two and a half years later and
the contaminants are still flowing into the ocean and will continue
to for the foreseeable future.
The
FDA
assures us that our food supply is safe, that the levels of radiation
found in fish samples are within safe limits for consumption. But one
has to question if this is true and, if it is true now, will it
remain true? Is this, like the statements issued from TEPCO, another
attempt to quell a public backlash in the face of an unprecedented
event that, as yet, has no solution and no end in sight?
As
for me, fish is off the menu.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.