Scarcely
reported.
US
House Seeks Syria-War Escalation
Moving
to trap President-elect Trump into a war escalation in Syria, the
House rushed through a resolution promoting a U.S.-imposed “no fly
zone” that could spark World War III, reports Rick Sterling.
22
November, 2016
Late
in the day, on Nov. 15, one week after the U.S. elections, the
lame-duck Congress convened in special session with normal rules
suspended so the House could pass House Resolution 5732, the “Caesar
Syria Civilian Protection Act”
calling for intensifying the already harsh sanctions on Syria, assessing the imposition of a “no fly zone” inside Syria (to prevent the Syrian government from flying) and escalating efforts to press criminal charges against Syrian officials.
calling for intensifying the already harsh sanctions on Syria, assessing the imposition of a “no fly zone” inside Syria (to prevent the Syrian government from flying) and escalating efforts to press criminal charges against Syrian officials.
HR5732 claims to promote a negotiated settlement in Syria but, as analyzed by Friends Committee for National Legislation, it imposes preconditions which would actually make a peace agreement more difficult.
There
was 40 minutes of “debate” with
six representatives (Ed Royce, R-California; Eliot Engel, D-New York;
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Florida; Dan Kildee, D-Michigan; Chris Smith,
R-New Jersey; and Carlos Curbelo, R-Florida) all speaking in favor of
the resolution. There were few other representatives present, but the
House Foreign Affairs Committee stated that
the resolution was passed “unanimously” without mentioning these
special conditions.
According
to Wikipedia, “Suspension
of the rules is
a procedure generally used to quickly pass non-controversial bills in
the United States House of Representatives … such as naming Post
Offices…” In this case, however, the resolution could lead to a
wider war in the Middle East and potentially World War III with
nuclear-armed Russia.
Most
strikingly, the resolution calls for evaluating and developing plans
for the United States to impose a “no fly zone” inside Syria, a
sovereign nation, an act of war that also would violate international
law as an act of aggression. It also could put the U.S. military in
the position of shooting down Russian aircraft.
To
call this proposal “non-controversial” is absurd, although it may
say a great deal about the “group think” of the U.S. Congress
that an act of war would be so casually considered. Clearly, this
resolution should have been debated under normal rules with a
reasonable amount of Congressional presence and debate.
The
motivation for bypassing normal rules and rushing the bill through
without meaningful debate was articulated by the bill’s sponsor,
Democrat Eliot Enel:
“We cannot delay action on Syria any further.
… If we don’t get this legislation across the finish line in the
next few weeks, we are back to square one.”
The
current urgency may be related to the election results since
President-elect Donald Trump has spoken out against “regime change”
foreign policy. As much as neoconservatives and their
liberal-interventionist allies are critical of President Obama for
not doing more in Syria, these Congressional hawks are even more
concerned about the prospect of a President who might move toward
peace and away from war.
The
Caesar Fraud
HR5732
is titled the “Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act,” which House
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Royce explained was named after “the
brave Syrian defector known to the world as Caesar, who testified to
us the shocking scale of torture being carried out within the prisons
of Syria.”
U.S.-backed
Syrian “moderate” rebels smile as they prepare to behead a
12-year-old boy (left), whose severed head is held aloft
triumphantly in a later part of the video. [Screenshot from the
YouTube video]
In
reality, the Caesar story was a grand
deception involving
the CIA with funding from Qatar to sabotage the 2014 Geneva peace
negotiations. The 55,000 photos which were said to show 11,000
torture victims have never been publicly revealed. Only a tiny number
of photos have been publicized. However, in 2015, Human Rights Watch
was granted access to view the entire set. They revealed that almost
one half the photos show the opposite of what was claimed: instead of
victims tortured by the Syrian government, they actually show dead
Syrian soldiers and civilian victims of car bombs and other terror
attacks. The “Caesar” story, replete with a masked “defector,”
was one of the early propaganda hoaxes regarding Syria.
One
of the other big lies regarding Syria is that the U.S. has been doing
nothing. Royce said, “The
administration has decided not to decide. And that itself,
unfortunately, has set a course where here we sit and watch and the
violence only worsens. Mr. Speaker, America has been sitting back and
watching these atrocities for far too long. Vital U.S. national
security interests are at stake.”
Rep.
Engel said, “Four years ago I thought we should have aided the Free
Syrian Army. They came to us in Washington and begged us for help. …
They were simply looking for weaponry. I really believe if we had
given it to them, the situation in Syria would have been different
today.”
That
narrative is nonsense. By late 2011, the U.S. was actively
coordinating, training and supplying armed opposition groups. When
Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan government was toppled in fall 2011, the
CIA oversaw the diversion of Libyan weapons to the Syrian armed
opposition, as documented in the Defense
Intelligence Agency report of
October 2012.
These
weapons transfers were secret. For the public record, it was
acknowledged that the U.S. was supplying communications equipment to
the armed opposition while U.S. “allies” — Saudi Arabia and
Qatar — were supplying the weaponry. This is one reason that Saudi
purchases of weapons skyrocketed during this time period; they were
buying weapons to replace those being shipped to the armed opposition
in Syria. It was very profitable for U.S. arms manufacturers.
Huge
weapons transfers to the armed opposition in Syria have continued to
the present, with the U.S. government even more directly involved.
This past spring, Janes Defense reported the
details of a U.S. delivery of 2.2 million pounds of ammunition,
rocket launchers and other weaponry to the armed opposition.
So,
the political claims that the U.S. has been inactive are baseless. In
reality, the U.S. has done everything short of a direct attack on
Syria. And the U.S. military is starting to cross that line. On Sept.
17, the U.S. air coalition conducted a series of airstrikes on the
Syrian Army in Deir Ezzor, killing 80 Syrian soldiers and enabling
ISIS to launch an attack on the position. Claims that it was a
“mistake” are highly dubious.
The
assertions by Congressional hawks that the U.S. has been “inactive”
in the Syrian conflict are part of the false narrative suggesting the
U.S. must “do something” which leads to a “no fly zone” and
full-scale war. Ironically, these calls for war are masked as
“humanitarian” though even proponents, such as Hillary Clinton,
privately have acknowledged that large numbers of Syrians, including
civilians, would be killed in the U.S. attacks needed to establish
the “no fly zone.”
And,
never do the proponents bring up the case of Libya where the U.S. and
NATO “did something”: destroyed the government and created chaos.
Fact-Free
House of Propaganda
With
only a handful of representatives present and no dissent, the six
Congressional members engaged in unrestrained propaganda and
misinformation.
Samantha
Power, Permanent Representative of the United States to the UN,
addresses the Security Council meeting on Syria, Sept. 25, 2016.
Power has been an advocate for escalating U.S. military involvement
in Syria. (UN Photo)
Engel,
said “We’re going into the New Year 2017, Assad still clings to
power, at the expense of killing millions of his citizens.” Even if
all the deaths, including Syrian soldiers and civilians killed by
anti-government jihadists, were blamed on Assad, this number is way
off anyone’s chats.
Rep.
Kildee said “The world has witnessed this terrible tragedy unfold
before our eyes. Nearly half a million Syrians killed. Not soldiers –
men, women, children killed.”
The
official text of the resolution says, “It
is the sense of Congress that– (1) Bashar al-Assad’s murderous
actions against the people of Syria have caused the deaths of more
than 400,000 civilians…”
The
above accusations – from “millions of citizens” to “half a
million” to “400,000 civilians” – are all preposterous
lies. Credible
estimates of
casualties in the Syrian conflict range from 300,000 to 420,000.
The opposition-supporting Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights estimates the documented 2011-2016 death
toll as follows: killed pro-Syrian forces – 108,000; killed
anti-government forces – 105,000; killed civilians – 89,000
In
contrast with Congressional and media claims, civilians comprise a
minority of the total death count and the heaviest casualties are
among those fighting in defense of the Syrian state. In the U.S.
political world and the mainstream media, these facts are ignored and
never mentioned because they point to the reality versus the
propaganda narrative which has allowed the U.S. and its allies to
continue funding terrorism and a war of aggression against Syria.
The
Congressional speakers were in full self-righteous mode as they
accused the Syrian government of “committing crimes against
humanity and war crimes against civilians including murder, torture
and rape. No one has been spared from this targeting, even children.”
A naive listener would never know that the Syrian government is
primarily fighting the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda including thousands
of foreign fighters supplied and paid by foreign governments.
The
speakers went on to accuse the Syrian military of
“targeting” hospitals, schools and markets. A critical listener
might ask why they would do that instead of targeting Al Qaeda
terrorists and their allies who launch dozens and sometimes hundreds
of hell-cannon
missilesinto
the government-held sections of Aleppo every day.
The
Congressional propaganda fest would not be complete without mention
of the “White
Helmets.” Royce
said “We (previously) heard the testimony of Raed Saleh of the
Syrian White Helmets. These are the doctors, nurses and volunteers
who actually, when the bombs come, run towards the areas that have
been hit in order to try to get the injured civilians medical
treatment. … They have lost over 600 doctors and nurses.”
This
is more Congressional nonsense. There are no nurses or doctors
associated with the White Helmets. The organization was created by
the U.S. and U.K. and heavily promoted by a “shady
PR firm.”
The White Helmets operate solely in areas controlled by Al Qaeda’s
Nusra Front (recently renamed Syria Conquest Front) and associated
terrorist groups. The White Helmets do some rescue work in the
conflict zone but their main role is in the information
war manipulating public
opinion.
The
White Helmets actively promote U.S./NATO intervention through a “no
fly zone.” Recently, the White Helmets became a major source of
claims about innocent civilian victims in east Aleppo.
Given
the clear propagandistic history of the White Helmets, these claims
should be treated with skepticism. We need to ask exactly what is the
evidence?
The
same skepticism needs to be applied to video and other reports from
the Aleppo Media Center. AMC is a creation of the Syrian
Expatriates Organization whose
address on K Street in Washington, D.C., indicates it is a U.S.
marketing operation.
What’s
Going On?
The
campaign to overthrow the Syrian government is failing and there is
possibility of a victory for the Syrian government and its allies.
A
heart-rending propaganda image designed to justify a major U.S.
military operation inside Syria against the Syrian military.
The
earlier flood of international jihadi recruits is drying up. The
Syrian Army and allies are gaining ground militarily and negotiating
settlements or re-locations with “rebels” who previously
terrorized Homs, Darraya (outer Damascus) and elsewhere. In Aleppo,
the Syrian army and allies are tightening the noose around the armed
opposition in east Aleppo.
This
has caused alarm among neoconservative lawmakers devoted to Israel,
Saudi Arabia and U.S. empire. They are desperate to prevent the
Syrian government from finally eliminating the terrorist groups which
the West and its allies have promoted for the past five-plus years.
“Pro
Israel” groups have
been major campaigners for passage of HR5732. The name of Simon
Wiesenthal is even invoked in the resolution. Rabbi Lee Bycel
wrote,“Where
is the Conscience of the World?” as
he questioned why the “humanitarian” HR5732 was not passed
earlier.
Israeli
interests are one of the primary forces sustaining and promoting the
conflict. Syria is officially at war with Israel which continues to
occupy the Syrian Golan Heights; Syria has been a key ally of the
Lebanese Hezbollah resistance; and Syria has maintained its alliance
with Iran. In 2010, Secretary of State Clinton
urged Syria to
break relations with Hezbollah, reduce relations with Iran and come
to settlement with Israel. The Syrian refusal to comply with these
Washington demands was instrumental in solidifying
Washington’s hostility.
Congressional
proponents of HR5732 make clear the international dimension of the
conflict. Royce explains, “It is Russia, it is Hezbollah, that are
the primary movers of death and destruction. … It is the IRGC
[Revolutionary Guard] fighters from Iran.”
Engel
echoes the same message: “Yes, we want to go after Assad’s
partners in violence … Iranian and Hezbollah forces.”
In
words and deeds Israel has made its position on Syria crystal clear.
Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren explained in
an interview: “we always wanted [President] Bashar Assad to go, we
always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad
guys who were backed by Iran … the greatest danger to Israel is by
the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut.
And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc.”
These
statements have been fully backed up by Israeli actions bombing
Syrian positions in
southern Syria and providing
medical treatmentfor
Nusra/Al Qaeda and other armed opposition fighters.
What
Will Happen Now?
If
the Syrian government and its allies continue to advance in Aleppo,
Deir Ezzor, outer Damascus and the south, the situation will come to
a head. The enemies of Syria – predominately the U.S., Gulf
Countries, NATO and Israel – will come to a decision point. Do they
intervene directly or do they allow their “regime change” project
to collapse? HR5732 is an effort to prepare for direct intervention
and aggression.
One
thing is clear from the experience of Libya: Neoconservatives do not
care if they leave a country in chaos. The main objective is to
destabilize and overthrow a government which is too independent. If
the U.S. and its allies cannot dominate the country, then at least
they can destroy the contrary authority and leave chaos.
What
is at stake in Syria is whether the U.S. and allies, including Israel
and Saudi Arabia, are able to destroy the last secular and
independent Arab country in the region and whether the U.S. goal of
being the sole superpower in the world prevails. The rushed passage
of HR5732 without any meaningful debate is indicative of that.
Despite
Trump’s election and his stated priority of taking on Islamic
terrorism – not overthrowing Assad – the “regime change”
proponents have not given up their war on Syria. They still seek to
escalate U.S. aggression there and hope to box President Trump in.
It’s
also clear that the U.S. Congress has become a venue where blatant
lies can be stated with impunity and where violent actions are
advanced behind a cynical and amoral veneer of “humanitarianism.”
Rick
Sterling is an investigative journalist and member of Syria
Solidarity Movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.