So
much for 1.5C, even 2.0C!
Even
this is wildly optimistic.Increases of at least 8C are more likely.
World
on track for 3C of warming under current global climate pledges,
warns UN
Current
climate commitments are insufficient to reduce emissions by the
amounts needed to avoid dangerous levels of global warming, says Unep
report
3
November, 2016
The
commitments made by governments on climate change will lead to
dangerous levels of global warming because they are incommensurate
with the growth of greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new
report.
The
United Nations Environment Programme (Unep) said that pledges put
forward to cut emissions would see temperatures rise by 3C above
pre-industrial levels, far above the the 2C of the Paris climate
agreement, which comes into force on Friday.
At
least a quarter must be cut from emissions by the end of the next
decade, compared with current trends, the UN said.
The
report found that emissions by 2030 were likely to reach about 54 to
56 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, a long way astray
of the 42 gigatonnes a year likely to be the level at which warming
exceeds 2C.
Erik
Solheim, chief of Unep, said the world was “moving in the right
direction” on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and tackling
climate change, but that measures should be taken urgently to avoid
the need for much more drastic cuts in emissions in future. “If we
don’t start taking additional action now, we will grieve over the
avoidable human tragedy.”
He
warned in particular that people would start being displaced from
their homes by the effects of climate change, suffering from drought,
hunger, disease and conflicts arising from these afflictions. Mass
migration as a result of climate change is hard to separate from
other causes of migration, but is predicted to become a much greater
problem.
This
year is “locked in” to be the hottest on record, according to
Nasa, eclipsing last year’s record heat, and may show the way to
future temperature rises and their accompanying problems.
Under
the Paris agreement, reached last December, all of the world’s
functioning governments have agreed to reduce greenhouse gases in
line with the need to hold warming to no more than 2C, which
scientists consider the limit of safety. That agreement has been
ratified by the US, China and the European Union, and several other
governments.
However,
while all of the governments involved in the Paris accord have agreed
their own domestic targets for curbing greenhouse gases, these are
not legally binding. In addition, few countries have set out concrete
plans for how they would implement the curbs.
Next
week, signatories to the Paris agreement will gather in Marrakesh to
flesh out some aspects of the pact reached last year. Supporters hope
that some countries may come up with fuller plans for how they mean
to achieve the necessary future emissions reductions, and countries
that have not yet ratified the agreement will be persuaded to do so.
None
are expected to announce new targets on emissions in line with the
reductions that the Unep report suggests are necessary. Nations
currently have domestic targets on curbing or cutting emissions by
2020, set out in 2009 at the UN meeting in Copenhagen, as well as
their Paris commitments which apply from 2025 to 2030.
Asad
Rehman, Friends of the Earth’s international climate campaigner,
said: “This is a stark warning that cannot be ignored – tougher
action on climate change is urgently needed to prevent the world
speeding towards catastrophe. Governments are drinking in the ‘last
chance saloon’ if the lofty goals of the Paris climate agreement
are to be met.”
Richard
Black, director of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit
thinktank, said: “Unep’s report confirms that there has been
remarkable acceleration towards a global low-carbon economy over the
past year, but considerably more action is required if governments
are to meet the target they set under the Paris agreement.”
Another
significant climate agreement was signed in the last few weeks. Under
the Montreal Protocol of 1987, countries agreed to phase out gases
known to be harmful to the ozone layer. Some of the substitutes,
however, turned out to be much more potent than carbon dioxide in
warming the planet.
Under
a new addition to that agreement countries around the world have
agreed to remove the harmful HFCs used in some air-conditioning and
refrigeration systems. If fully implemented, this could result in a
0.5C reduction in future warming. Given the goal set in Paris for
limiting global temperature rises to 2C, this would make a
significant difference to the world’s actions on climate change if
it is fully endorsed. Phasing out the relevant chemicals may take
much of the rest of the decade, however, and could face resistance in
some industries.
Solheim
urged countries to embark on more ambitious programmes to improve
energy efficiency, increase the amount of energy coming from
renewable sources, and look to meet the national targets they set in
Paris.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.