Fukushima
Dumps 30 TRILLION Bq Radioactive Water, Lower Tuna Catch Quota update
8/22/13
30
Trillion, (yes TRILLION WITH A T) Becquerels of radioactive water
flowing to Pacific Ocean (at least according to TEPCO). So you can
multiply THAT 30 Trillion by a bigger number they might admit to in
the future... if the land doesn't collapse under the plants before
they can say "oops, out of our control" we don't know how
much death we did. We so sowee. Bow Bow Bow.
High
radiation reading on 2 more of these Cheap tanks that hold
radioactive water used to cool the molten blobs of death located
somewhere in the earth (location unknown), so I just want to ask you,
if they are pouring water on these blobs in "hiding places"
(tepco says they don't know Where they are), How do they Know they
are Cooling them? It seems to me that if they hit ground water, then
what is the use of throwing more water on them? I'm just throwing
that out there for conversation. Like trying to drown a mole under
your grass when you don't know where the mole is... Whatever...
moving on.
Tepco
says all the tanks are fine and full (the news guy chokes on that
part), but with 10 rads leaking into a single puddle, enough to kill
a person in an hour, and NO GAUGES on the tanks (shoddily built), how
can they check the tanks to see if they are fine or not? How can they
even install the gauges if they can't get near them?
They
keep referring to all this leaking from a small puddle in a tank
raising the severity from level 1 to level 3 (on a logrithmic scale)
in the course of a single day, but they have simply ignored the
ongoing leaking of ground water into the pacific. The IAEA has the b
a l l s to say Fukushima disaster is now just a level One with Three
full meltdowns confirmed, possibly a spent fuel pool meltdown, too...
Where is any common sense here? Leaking tanks level 3, but 3,
possilbly more meltdowns (correction) melt THROUGHS are a level ONE?
WTF!
So
the NRA (Japan's NRC version) orders them to "watch over the
tanks better and install gauges"... OKay, good luck with THAT...
Bluefin
Tuna catch quota limit reduced... read into that and tell me what you
think...
Infowars
thinks a story from 2011 is breaking news on Fukushima. Smile and you
get no radiation effects... be unhappy and you will be safe from
radiation. Way to Go infowars. Way to dig into the news of the day...
Seriously?
I'm
tired of typing. Here are the enenews.com headlines.
Media
now exposing Fukushima cover-up: "So many terrible things are
not being reported" — Official radiation figures cannot be
trusted — Regulator suspects Tepco giving gov't false data —
Problems much worse than officials claim
Senior
Scientist: Chernobyl was nothing with potential of Fukushima right on
ocean — No way to contain all this radioactive water — You can't
stop groundwater flow — Every bit of news we're getting is
radioactivity numbers are going up
Wall
St. Journal: They don't know where Fukushima's melted fuel cores are,
or in what state — Expert: "It's important to think of
worst-case scenario"... Even greater levels of contamination may
be on the way — Plant "built on a river"
Louisiana
Sinkhole is #1 on BBC — "Terrifying Sinkhole Swallows Up
Entire Trees In Seconds" — "Must-see: Trees Disappear"
(VIDEOS)
TV:
Isn't Fukushima Daiichi at least a 21 on International Nuclear Event
Scale, equal to 3 Level 7′s? "Global catastrophe... Disaster
of unimaginable proportions" (VIDEO)
UPI:
"Fukushima plant is approaching a worst case scenario" —
Top Japan Nuclear Official: "This is what we have been fearing"
CNN:
Japan's nuclear regulator called Fukushima "a house of
horrors"... They are not prone to hyperbole, an unbelievable
thing to say — "Very, very serious... incredibly frightening"
(VIDEO)
Nuclear
Expert on BBC: "Absolutely no guarantee" walls of Fukushima
fuel pools aren't cracked — Salt water "would basically
explode the walls, you can't see that; you can't get close enough"
BBC:
Fukushima "much worse than we've been led to believe, much
worse" says nuclear expert — Contaminated water is leaking out
all over site
New
York Times: "Potential for huge spill" of highly
radioactive liquid from many Fukushima tanks all at once, says
nuclear design expert — Top Officials: Leaks from more tanks are
"the biggest concern... We are extremely concerned"
NYT:
Fears of environmental calamity from Fukushima disaster — Japan
Nuclear Expert: It's getting worse... People all over world need to
be informed... first case in history where so much contaminated water
flowing in ocean
Reuters:
Crisis deepening at Fukushima nuclear plant; Upgraded to 'Level 3
Serious Incident' — Represents a 100-fold increase in "severity
of a radiological release" — Tepco says highly radioactive
leakage continues, but unknown where from
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.