Fukushima,
Climate Change, Near-Term Extinction: Resignation Vs. Surrender
Carolyn
Baker
2
August, 2013
All
things die and all things live forever;
But
our task is to die,
To
die making roads,
Roads
over the sea.
~Antonio
Machado~
Recently
a reader of my website asked me to clarify the difference between
resignation and surrender. When faced with catastrophic climate
change, near-term extinction, and the worst emission of radiation in
the history of the world from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, how
should we respond? The reader found himself swimming in deep despair
and feeling very much like giving up—perhaps even ceasing the
breast strokes of vigorous swimming, plunging further into the
despair, and intentionally inhaling as deeply as possible. Well, that
would be suicide, and he didn’t feel ready for that—at least not
in that moment, and the word “surrender” kept coming to mind, but
isn’t that the same as giving up?
This
morning’s Guardian headline reads “Fukushima Warning: Danger
Level At Nuclear Plant Jumps To ‘Serious’,” and the Wall St.
Journal states unequivocally that ‘TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power
Company) Has Lost Control.’ Just a few days ago I posted on my site
Guy McPherson’s latest piece “19 Ways Climate Change Is Feeding
On Itself,” and Washington’s Blog screams, “West Coast Of North
America To Be Hit Hard By Fukushima Radiation,” complete with a
detailed map of the ocean current called the North Pacific Gyre which
is bringing Japanese radiation to the West Coast of North America.
Why would I not want to give up? Why would I not want to ingest a
large dosage of ‘Fuckidall’ or go eat 700 pounds of chocolate? Go
to the gym today? Are you freakin’ kidding me?
As
I’ve mentioned in earlier posts, I occasionally hear people saying
things like, “Well, we’re not going to be here after 2030 by
which time near-term extinction is ‘guaranteed’ so what I eat or
drink or smoke or do or don’t do doesn’t matter.”
That’s
called resignation or giving up, and from my perspective, indulging
in it, even if I feel compelled to do so, is a cowardly, delusional
kind of devil’s bargain that essentially affirms that I have no
purpose here except breathing air and ingesting food and water.
Resignatio in Latin connotes submission, acquiescence, and
compliance. Is this not the same as surrender? Actually, it’s not.
Hopefully,
everyone reading these words, like me, is not willing to go gently,
quietly, or complacently into the abyss that our species has created.
If we do—if at this unprecedented time in the history of our planet
we resign ourselves to defining our existence only in terms of the
physical plane, as if we have absolutely no connection with anything
eternal or constant, then we are inexorably as foolish as the
purveyors of industrial civilization who are engaged in rendering
this planet uninhabitable.
Surrender
is fundamentally different from resignation because unlike the
latter, it is not a passive act. Surrender is always a choice, and in
our “dead man walking” status on planet Earth, we may be able to
change nothing in the external milieu, but we have agency in how we
meet our fate. Certainly we have the option and the right to muddle
our way into oblivion like comatose inebriates, and countless
millions will choose and are choosing that path.
Mentally,
I keep returning to Nazi death camp survivors and the unspoken,
seemingly feckless choices they made on a daily basis that allowed
them to prevail. Perhaps a drawing made in the mud or jokes they
furtively told to one another or a decision that every day they would
find meaning somewhere, somehow in the hellish drudgery and brutality
of their lives.
Giving
up is easy. Surrender takes enormous courage and self-regard—an
abiding conviction that one’s human dignity is worth it, even if
one is bereft of family and friends. Surrender acknowledges that in
the last half of 2013, the human species is marching obliviously in
its own funeral procession and that perhaps one can choose instead to
march consciously, all the while asking questions that matter.
Questions like: What is left for me to do here? How do I most wisely
use the time I have left? What is my work in these remaining years?
What gifts do I have that I must give? What brings meaning to the
lives of people around me? What brings meaning to me?
As
people approach their own demise, life review is crucial. How did I
live? How did I love? What were the very best moments? What were the
worst? And most importantly: What did I learn? Who did I become as a
result of the wise choices I made and the ones that weren’t so
wise? Invariably, there will be grief, and impending funerals are the
exact venues where it must erupt. But as William Blake said, “The
deeper the sorrow, the greater the joy,” and if we allow and follow
the grief, joy will inevitably emerge from its depths.
At
this moment we are confronted with a horrendous reality. Not only is
climate change decimating the planet, but added to that catastrophe
is one that, unlike climate change, we cannot measure because the
facts pertaining to it are concealed. Fortunately, we have a plethora
of data regarding climate change, but foolish and frightened humans
have been concealing the realities of Fukushima from the world for
more than two years. Our sense of powerlessness grows exponentially
by the hour. Fukushima is out of control, and so are we.
In
World As Lover, World As Self, Joanna Macy refers to the work of
Polish psychiatrist Kazimierz Dabrowski who speaks of “positive
disintegration” or the cracking of outgrown shells which he argues
“permits the emergence of higher psychic structures and awareness.”
What disintegrates in times of catastrophe is not the essence of who
we are, the deeper self, but rather, our defenses, our notions about
who we are, that is to say, the ego. I say, bring it on. No, not
psychosis or madness but an authentic decomposition of ego.
While
the human ego gets a lot of bad press, the reality is that we need
one. I would ask anyone who tells me that they have lost their ego
how it is that they can find their car keys or the door to the
restroom. We cannot live without an ego, but unbeknownst to the
fathers of industrial civilization, the ego is only one small aspect
of who we are. Near-term extinction and Fukushima are the best and
the worst that the ego can produce, and left to its own devices, the
ego will always replicate such horrors.
The
human ego has reached the end of the line, and our struggle with the
difference between giving up and surrendering is to be celebrated as
its last death gasp. It has taken us to the jaws of death where we
must choose to die to at least the old paradigm, and yes, perhaps,
choose to die literally. Thus, it is now time to stop investing 90
percent of our energy in logistical preparation and 10 percent in
emotional and spiritual preparation—if we have time and if we feel
like it. In fact, these proportions should be reversed. For so many
reasons—go ahead and count them, we are marching in our own funeral
procession. There is enormous work to be done emotionally and
spiritually in preparing for what appears to be our certain demise.
If anyone feels uncertain about what I’m referring to, please
contact me.
The
termination of the three-dimensional, Enlightenment-engendered,
patriarchal, soul-murdering, planet-annihilating paradigm of
industrial civilization is upon us, and we should not be railing and
raging against it if we are not willing to do the emotional and
spiritual work to buy out of it and transform consciousness as we
surrender to the inevitable. What we all need now is not another
permaculture course or another bucket of barley but rather, the soft
touch and locked eye contact of each other. We need our hearts to be
broken open and our tears to water and soak the earth and wash away
the encrusted filth of civilization that pollutes and paralyzes our
souls. That, dear reader, is not about giving up, but choosing to
rise to the unprecedented, Herculean challenge of healing and
transformation that the current catastrophes have thrown in our
faces.
It
may be time to die, but let us, as the poet Machado says, die making
roads over the sea.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.