WTO Ruling Against India's Solar Push Threatens Climate, Clean Energy
"The U.S. should be applauding India’s efforts to scale up solar energy—not turning to the WTO to strike the program down."
27
August, 2015
The
World Trade Organization (WTO) on Wednesday ruled against India over
its national solar energy program in a case brought by the U.S.
government, sparking outrage from labor and environmental advocates.
As
power demands grow in India, the country's government put forth a
plan to create 100,000 megawatts of energy from solar cells and
modules, and included incentives to domestic manufacturers to use
locally-developed equipment.
According
to Indian news
outlets,
the WTO ruled that India had discriminated against American
manufacturers by providing such incentives, which violates global
trade rules, and struck down those policies—siding with the U.S.
government in a case that the Sierra Club said demonstrates the
environmentally and economically destructive power of pro-corporate
deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
"Today,
we have more evidence of how free trade rules threaten the clean
energy economy and undermine action to tackle the climate crisis,"
Ilana Solomon, director of the Sierra Club's Responsible Trade
Program, said on
Thursday. "The U.S. should be applauding India’s efforts to
scale up solar energy—not turning to the WTO to strike the program
down."
has resorted to similar measures, specifying local content requirements and offering a range of subsidies for promoting its renewable energy sector at the federal, state, regional and local levels.
India spoke repeatedly against the US at WTO’s committee on subsidies and countervailing measures, stating that American subsidy schemes relating to local or domestic content requirements for its solar companies are inconsistent with its global trade obligations.
In
addition, Livemint reports,
the ruling "goes against the spirit of an agreement signed early
this year.... [in which] the two sides agreed to promote clean energy
and expand solar energy initiatives."
Regardless,
Solomon said, the WTO "needs to get out of the business of
hampering climate action in countries around the globe. The outdated
trade rules on the books now and under negotiation in trade pacts
including the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade
and Investment Partnership encourage trade in fossil fuels and
discourage countries from developing local clean energy capacity."
"These
rules simply do not reflect the urgency of solving the climate crisis
and stand in the way of clean energy growth," Solomon said.
The
Indian government will appeal the decision to the WTO's highest
court, the appellate body. It is the second time that the WTO has
ruled against India in a case with the U.S., which
first brought legal
action against the country's food security program in 2014.
The
WTO ruled on that case in June, when it decided that the Indian ban
on certain foods from the U.S. was "inconsistent with the global
norms."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.