Russian
Fighter Barrel-Rolls Over a US Spy Plane on a 'Routine Mission' off
the Coast of Kaliningrad
Why
is US routinely flying spy missions off the Russian coast?
18
April, 2016
Seeing
how cooperative regime media in the west was last week when US Navy
took to Twitter and Youtube to cry
about unarmed Russian jet "flying dangerously close" to
their ship – which happened
to be drilling 70 nautical miles off the Russian city of
Kaliningrad – you can't really blame the Air Force for wanting
in on some of that action too.
US
Air Force is feigning shock and horror as it tells the media that a
Russian Su-27 fighter jet performed a dangerous maneuver while
intercepting a US spy plane on a "routine mission"
in Baltic international waters (which unless US was spying on
Poland would have been off the Russian coast).
The
actions of the US military are perfectly understandable; the more
anti-Russian hysteria it can generate the bigger piece of the budget
pie it will get.
Its
the media which is failing to do its job (if you believe their job is
to inform). Somehow nobody in the western mainstream is asking the
question how is a spying mission off the Russian coast a "routine"
thing? It is certainly not to the Russians.
On
Jan. 25, 2016 a U.S. RC-135 intelligence
gathering jet was
intercepted by a Russian Su-27
Flanker fighter
jet over
Black Sea:
during the interception, the Su-27 made an aggressive turn that
disturbed the controllability of the RC-135.
On Apr. 7, 2015 another Su-27 flew within 20 feet of an RC-135U, over the Baltic Sea.
On Apr. 23, 2015 a U.S. Air Force RC-135U Combat Sent performing a routine surveillance mission in international airspace over the Sea of Okhotsk, north of Japan, some 60 miles off eastern Russia was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 Flanker that crossed the route of the U.S. aircraft putting itself within 100 feet of the Combat Sent.
This
is supposed to show Russians are routinely reckless and aggressive,
but what it really shows is how routine and normal it is for the US
to harass Russia with spying missions off Russia's every coast.
Americans
contend their surveillance flights do not break international
law, but Russians say neither do their "reckless"
intercepts – ie what's good for the goose is good for the
gander.
The
only difference between the two is that Americans are crying about it
to the media, even though it's taking place in Russian seas –
frequently inside the Russian maritime exclusive
economic one.
The CNN version
Barrel
rolls over plane in latest Baltic Sea provocation
A
Russian fighter jet flew dangerously close to a U.S. RC-135
reconnaissance aircraft on Thursday in the latest military
provocation by Moscow over the Baltic Sea, the U.S. European Command
said Saturday.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.