NEPAL DISASTER: HOW CLIMATE CHANGE TRIGGERS EARTHQUAKES
Image
by Nirmal Dulal and courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
24
April, 2016
One
year ago, Nepal was rocked by a devastating 7.8-magnitude earthquake.
In conjunction with a major aftershock one month later, the April 25
disaster claimed around 9,000 lives, injured tens of thousands more,
and reduced holy sites like the Dharahara tower and Vatsala Durga to
rubble.
The
quake was not entirely unexpected. Residents in this seismically
active part of the world have collected records of seismic activity
for hundreds if not thousands of years. Earlier earthquakes have done
far more damage. An 8.1-magnitude quake in 1934, for example,
resulted in the deaths of 19,000 in Nepal and neighboring India.
But
as world leaders lined up at the United Nations on Friday to commit
their nations to greenhouse gas reductions intended to interrupt the
worst manifestations of warming-driven climate change, earthquakes
were likely not on the top of anyone’s mind. Global warming means
deepened droughts and strengthened storms, the loss of sea ice and
glaciers, and speeding up of sea-level rise. Some reporting moves the
goalposts into social impacts of such a warmed world to project
social crises such as war and famine. But one area is often
overlooked: earthquakes.
The
reticence of today’s policy makers and climate communicators to
roll more frequent or strengthened earthquakes into the forecast is
understandable—especially when there is no “hockey stick” to
hold up linking earthquake activity to the thickening greenhouse
layer, as can be done with heat, with sea-levels, with disasters
broadly. There was that tripling of the “great” earthquakes over
the 00’s threshold, but suggestions of a climate link were batted
away at least in one case for a lack of proper academic citations.
Those
living on the front lines of climate change, however, aren’t so
guarded.
“There
seems a direct relationship between glacier retreat and earthquakes,”
said Pakistani researcher and writer Hamid A. Mir. “The local
communities of this area have developed a common belief that the
greater are the floods in summer spell the greater and more frequent
will be earthquakes during winter spell. This is what we have been
experiencing for the last three decades, ever since climate change
has taken momentum in the area.”
In
fact, the the research community has long studied the relationship
between changes in surface water weight with seismic activity below.
The
rapid expansion of large-scale hydropower projects worldwide inspired
Indian seismologist H.K. Gupta’s to write “Dams and Earthquakes”
in 1976. The controversy it caused at the time dissipated by the time
he updated the work in 1992, by then listing 70 known cases of
reservoir-induced earthquakes, including tremblers in China, Zambia,
Greece, India, and the United States, among others.
The
question today is what impact our fast disappearing glaciers will
have on the tectonic plates they’re floating upon.
In
a 2004 paper, researchers reported that melting glaciers in Southern
Alaska was to blame for 1979’s 7.2-magnitude St. Elias earthquake.
A similar study four years later found that increased “ice wastage”
between 2002 and 2006 resulted in a corresponding increase of
tectonic activity in Icy Bay, Alaska.
So
what of the climate-driven retreat of glaciers worldwide? What are we
to expect?
In
Ecuador, where a 7.8-magnitude quake took the lives of hundreds
earlier this month, glaciers are melting fast, with nearly half of
the Cotopaxi glacial cap having melted off just since 1976.
Screen
Shot 2016-04-24 at 8.45.40 PM“The main lesson we should take from
the post-glacial period and from our recent dam-building campaigns is
that the removal or addition of ice and water—in sufficiently large
quantities—can have a significant impact on the behavior of
underlying and adjacent faults,” Bill McGuire writes in his 2012
book, “Waking the Giant: How a Changing Climate Triggers
Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Volcanoes.”
Even
“minor” shifts in weight in this vulnerable area (which McGuire,
professor emeritus of Geophysical and Climate Hazards at University
College London, likens to a mere geologic “handshake”) threaten a
seismic response. With the onset of global warming, shifting
gigatonnes of water flowing from the Himalaya threaten “waking the
giant” of tectonic misbehavior.
Across
the high Himalaya and broader Third Pole region, temperatures are
rising several times faster than the global average, resulting in the
accelerating appearance of glacial lakes where previously there was
only ice and snow. Chinese researchers recently conducted what is
thought to be the first glacial inventory using Landsat imagery and
reported last year that between 1990 and 2010 glacier melt created
1,100 new high-altitude lakes across the Himalaya, Tibetan Plateau,
Hindu Kush, and Pamir Mountains. During that 20-year period, the
number of identified lakes grew from 4,602 to 5,701.
Global
risk analytics firm Verisk Maplecroft ranks Nepal as one most climate
vulnerable nations on earth. Increasingly erratic rainfall patterns
and rising temperatures from global warming are likely to damage the
agriculture and forestry sectors of Nepal’s economy now employing
an estimated three-quarters of all Nepalis, for example.
Even
more damaging, however, may be the threat of massive flooding driven
by already increasing glacier melt, extreme rainfall events,
earthquakes, and the formation and expansion of glacial lakes, all
funneling into a rising risk of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs).
In a 2010 review of the growing global glacial retreat, Colombia
University’s Ben Orlove recounts a 1985 outburst flood in Nepal
that released a “wall of water” 10 meters high that traveled
nearly 100 kilometers and destroyed 14 bridges and a “nearly
completed” hydroelectric plant.
Both
the total reliance on hydropower and the rapidly melting landscape
pose additional threats via earthquake, which are capable of getting
much worse.
Geologic
features deep in the Himalayas once considered outside the range of
quake behavior may be much more conducive than previously thought. A
pair of researchers last year found that quake ruptures “extended
past a ‘lock line’ where brittle rock becomes more plastic in its
behavior—a region where slip was expected to creep along quietly
and not contribute to the overall power of the earthquake.”
In
writing up their finding, researchers Eric Hand and Priyanka Pulla,
warned of a coming “megaquake.”
“The
discovery suggests that, as awful as the present disaster is, future
earthquakes in the Himalayas could end up being mightier and more
calamitous than modelers assumed,” the pair wrote.
Even
under the growing threat of GLOFs and earthquakes, the broader
region’s energy needs have spurred a massive water grab that
threatens to make the Himalayas the “most dammed region in the
world.” This brings a risk of dam failure delivering tsunami-like
floods. “It would be a Fukushima moment—earthquake followed by
tsunami,” Buckley writes in The Ecologist. “Only in this case, an
inland tsunami would be unleashed on a river. The megadam becomes a
lethal hydro-bomb, piling horror upon horror.”
Currently,
India is involved in nearly 300 major dam projects and China roughly
100 such efforts. Nepal is pursuing several large dam efforts,
including the West Seti Project, expected to be the highest Concrete
Faced Rock Filled dam in the world when complete and hold 1,500
million cubic meters of water.
This
post is adapted from the paper, “Climate Change and Earthquakes:
Mitigating Future ‘Natural’ Disasters in Nepal,” presented by
the author at the 4th Annual Himalayan Studies Conference in Austin,
Texas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.