Obama
Requests Military Support for Possible War Against Russia
Eric
Zuesse
23
April, 2015
According
to an April
23rd article carried by Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten (German
Economic News), U.S. President Barack Obama is “demanding the
active deployment of the Bundeswehr [Germany’s armed forces,
including their Army, Navy, and Air Force] to NATO’s eastern
borders” at Poland and the Baltic republics, to join the
quadrupling of America’s forces there, on and near the borders of
Russia. This is an
extreme violation of what Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to
when he ended the Soviet Union and its NATO-mirror organization the
Warsaw Pact,
but it’s actually culminating a process that began shortly after he
agreed to America’s terms, which included that NATO “not move one
inch to the east.”
Furthermore,
DWN reports that on April 25th, the U.S. President will hold a summit
meeting in Hannover, Germany with the leaders of Germany (Angela
Merkel), Italy (Matteo Renzi), France (Francois Hollande), and
Britain (David Cameron). The presumed objective of this meeting is to
agree to establish in the NATO countries bordering on Russia a
military force of these five countries, a force threatening Russia
with an invasion, if or when NATO subsequently decides that the
‘threat from Russia’ be ‘responded to’ militarily.
NATO’s
encirclement of Russia with forces hostile to it is supposedly
defensive — not an offensive operation — against Russia and is
presented as such by our media. During the 1962 Cuban
Missile Crisis, J. F. Kennedy didn’t consider Nikita
Khrushchev’s plan to base nuclear missiles in Cuba to be
‘defensive’ on the USSR’s part — and neither does Russia’s
President Vladimir Putin consider America’s far bigger operation of
surrounding Russia with such weapons to be ‘defensive’. The
U.S. government, and NATO, act as if Russia is threatening them
rather than them threatening and encircling Russia — and their news
media transmit this lie as if it were a truth and one worthy of being
taken seriously. In actual fact, NATO has already expanded
right up to Russia’s western borders.
Obama
is thus now adding to the economic sanctions against Russia that he
had imposed because
of Russia’s alleged ‘seizure’ of Crimea from
Ukraine after the US and EU engineered coup overthrew
Russia’s ally Viktor Yanukovych who had led Ukraine until
the coup in
February 2014.
Even
though Western-sponsored polls in Crimea, both before and after the
coup, had shown higher
than 90% support by Crimeans for rejoining with Russia,
right after Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to rejoin Russia, Obama
slapped sanctions against Russia. Nuclear weapons were prepared, both
on the U.S.-EU side and on the Russian side, for a possible nuclear
war.
This
is no mere restoration of the Cold War (which was supposedly based on
the capitalist-communist ideological disagreement); it’s getting
forces into position for a possible invasion of Russia,
pure-and-simple — raw conquest — though no major news-media in
the West are reporting it as being such.
The
current preparation doesn’t necessarily mean a nuclear war will
result from them. Russia might accept whatever the demands ‘the
West’ makes of it and thus lose its sovereignty.
Alternatively, if Russia stands-its-ground and refuses to yield up
its national sovereignty,‘the West’ (the U.S.leadership, and the
leaderships in its allied countries) could cease with its
evermore-ominous threats and simply withdraw from Russia’s
borders.
Basically, by 2013 the U.S. leadership had decided to take over Ukraine and refused to acknowledge the rights of the Crimean people to reject the new dispensation in Kiev and decide on its own future — and, by late February 2014, Russia’s leadership decided toprotect them against the type of invasion that subsequently occurred in Ukraine’s former Donbass region, where the opposition to Obama’s coup was even more intense.
The
West keeps asserting that Russia is somehow in
the wrong here. However, since even the head of Stratfor has
called what Obama did in Ukraine “the
most blatant coup in history”,
and since the fact that it was a U.S. coup has been documented
extensively on
cellphone and other videos,
and in the
most thorough academic investigation that has been performed of the
matter —
and was
even acknowledged by Ukraine’s Petro Poroshenko, a participant in
the coup, to have been a coup —
and since evidence survives on the Internet of the
U.S. Embassy’s preparations as early as 1 March 2013 for
the February 2014 coup; and since even
the U.S. government’s hired polls showed that Crimeans rejected
overwhelmingly the U.S. coup and supported rejoining Russia;
the question still needs to be answered: What is the basis of the
West’s aggressive actions threatening Russia’s national security
other than its own imperialist ambitions towards Russia camouflaged
with the lies about an aggressive Russia and an aggressive President
Putin the Western mass media have been bombarding the public with?
And, that’s a very worrisome basis — worrisome regarding,
essentially, a type ofdictatorship in
the West, rather than any dictatorship outside it. The
aggression and the threat here seem clearly to be coming from the
West, against the East.
Back
in January, Russian President Vladimir Putin had once again called
out American President Barack Obama on Obama’s big lie that
America’s “ABM” weapons to disable in-flight nuclear missiles
were being installed in Europe in order to protect Europe against
Iranian nuclear missiles. Now, however, while the U.S.
acknowledges that Iran doesn’t have, and won’t have, any nuclear
missiles,
Obama is stepping up (instead of ending) those same ABM
installations in Europe, close to Russia’s borders. The only
real reason they have been installed, as Putin argues, is in order to
enable a sudden nuclear attack against Russia capable of disabling
Russia’s retaliatory capacity in a matter of minutes.
The
only rational response by the Western public to what
Obama and his foreign allies are doing is
to recognize what is actually happening and to take action against
their own leaders, before this
increasingly high-stakes confrontation becomes
terminal. In this instance, the people of the countries that
comprise the political West need to defend themselves against their
own national leaders. This is a situation that is frequently
encountered in dictatorships.
The
key questions are not being asked in the Western press, however; they
are being ignored by it. Unless these questions are publicly
dealt with — and soon — the answer to them all could well be
terminal for millions of civilians in Europe and elsewhere.
The closer things get to a nuclear war, the more difficult it is for either side to back down from it — and this is especially the case with the aggressor, most especially when it falsely claims that it is being aggressed-against.
This
is the reason why the lies peddled by the political leadership of the
West urgently need to be exposed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.