New
Zealand government plans major increase in military spending
Tom
Peters
20
April, 2016
New
Zealand’s National Party government is finalising its 2016 Defence
White Paper, which will outline spending and strategic priorities for
the country’s military. The document was initially planned for
release at the end of last year but has been delayed for months.
Australia’s
Defence White Paper, released in February, announced a massive $A195
billion in spending over the next decade on military acquisitions
alone—new submarines, warships, jet fighters and an array of other
military hardware. The purpose is to further integrate Australia into
the US “pivot to Asia”—the military encirclement and
preparations for war against China, which the White
Paper identified
as a threat to Australian interests.
New
Zealand Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee told the New
Zealand Heraldhis
government’s White Paper was being prepared in close consultation
with Australia and “will similarly reflect those shared values and
security perspectives, including the importance of interoperability
between our defence forces.”
Like
Australia, New Zealand’s political establishment supports the
anti-China “pivot” and views its alliance with Washington as
crucial to defending its own neo-colonial interests in the South
Pacific. The Obama administration is demanding military
“interoperability” with Australia and New Zealand, along with
other US allies throughout the region, in order to build a
fully-integrated force to confront China.
While
seeking to preserve cordial relations with China, New Zealand’s
second largest trading partner, Prime Minister John Key’s
government has committed to the US war drive. New Zealand’s air
force is part of the Bersama Shield exercise currently underway in
the South China Sea involving Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and
Britain. In March, New Zealand joined exercises with the US and South
Korea.
Over
the past year, the US has greatly heightened tensions in the South
China Sea, condemning China’s land reclamation and “militarisation”
of reefs and atolls under its administration. The US navy has already
mounted two “freedom of navigation” operations, directly
challenging China’s territorial claims by sending warships within
the 12-nautical-mile limit around Chinese administered islets.
Washington is pressing its allies to follow suit.
To
strengthen “interoperability” with the US and Australia, New
Zealand has already increased military spending and will undoubtedly
outline more funding in the White Paper. Earlier this year, the
Defence Ministry announced plans for an extra $11 billion worth of
acquisitions over the next decade, including new air transport,
surveillance aircraft and navy frigates. In February, the government
announced a $440 million upgrade of weapons systems for two frigates.
Eight new helicopters also have been purchased for the navy.
Last
month the Defence Force reportedly requested multi-million dollar
submarine-spotting equipment for its Orion aircraft. Robert Ayson,
head of the Centre for Strategic Studies in Wellington, told Radio
NZ, “the South Pacific is not a heavy submarine area but New
Zealand also operates further afield.” China and other Southeast
Asian nations were increasing their underwater capabilities, he said.
In other words, the upgrade is not for defensive purposes but to
assist the aggressive operations by the US near Chinese territory.
The
Pentagon is placing a premium on naval forces as its plans for war
with China—AirSea Battle—envisage massive air and missile attacks
on the Chinese mainland from ships and submarines in nearby waters,
as well as US military bases in Asia. American and allied forces
would also be used to impose a naval blockade aimed at crippling the
Chinese economy by cutting off vital imports of energy and raw
materials.
A
new $46 million Battle Training Facility for the elite Special Air
Service (SAS) forces will play a key role in training New Zealand
troops to fight in US and Australian-led operations. Key and Brownlee
attended the official opening of the facility on April 8. According
to Fairfax Media, “special forces representatives from the USA and
Australia, as well as other international military dignitaries”
were also present.
The
facility will be used for joint exercises involving US and other
foreign troops, as well as by other branches of the NZ Defence Force
and the police. The New
Zealand Herald reported
that it would train soldiers for environments such as Iraq and
Afghanistan and “urban battlefields,” including “Auckland high
rise buildings, a ship captured by pirates, hotels and shopping
malls.”
Defence
Force Chief Lieutenant General Tim Keating said the SAS would be
trained to respond to threats that “can be from someone on your
side, or some unsuspecting place.”
During
their rotations in Afghanistan, as part of the US-led occupation, the
NZ SAS were implicated in war
crimes against
prisoners and Afghan civilians. Using the threat of terrorism as a
pretext, these elite troops are to be prepared for operations within
New Zealand—potentially to suppress protests against the
government’s deepening austerity measures and the march toward war.
The
military’s spending spree comes amid ongoing attacks on working
people’s living standards. In response to the economic crisis, the
government has cut funding to healthcare and welfare, and is
destroying thousands of jobs, including at the Inland Revenue
Department, New Zealand Post and state-owned mining company Solid
Energy.
Far
from criticising the military spend-up, the opposition Labour Party
and its ally, the right-wing populist New Zealand First Party, have
attacked the government from the right, calling for even more
spending and military recruitment. The last Labour government fully
restored New Zealand’s alliance with the US by sending troops to
Afghanistan and Iraq. The opposition parties have embraced New
Zealand’s alignment with the US against China and have sought to
whip up anti-Chinese xenophobia by scapegoating Chinese immigrants
over the housing crisis and unemployment.
On
April 14, NZ First defence spokesman Ron Mark released figures
showing that the navy patrol vessels Pukaki and Taupo had not spent
any time out of port since 2012 and 2013 respectively. He declared:
“Our Navy is frankly way too small and our seas are mostly
unguarded.” Mark said the navy should be equipped to patrol beyond
New Zealand’s exclusive economic zone to cover “a vast slice of
the globe that extends from Antarctica to north of the equator and
mid-Tasman to east of the Cook Islands.”
Labour’s
defence spokesman Phil Goff said the navy was “crippled by staff
shortages” following a 23 percent reduction in staff in 2012. He
denounced Defence Minister Brownlee for lacking “commitment to our
armed forces being able to carry out the roles the country needs it
to.”
NZ
First spokesman Mark also lashed out at the National Party for
reportedly preparing to close army training areas at Waiouru and
Tekapo. He described the move as a “betrayal” and accused the
government of being “short-sighted with respect to what it takes to
train and prepare for war,” adding that “internationally, we live
in a time of unprecedented instability.” To help “prepare for
war,” NZ First recently proposed a scheme for unemployed youth as
young as 15 to receive army
training.
The entire political establishment is committed to the militarisation
of society and the integration of New Zealand into Washington’s
reckless drive toward war with China.
The
author also recommends:
NZ-US
military exercise rehearses for incursion into Pacific[24
November 2015]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.