Japan
Professor: Pregnant women get free new houses if they move back to
Fukushima —
Physician/Mayor:
Children being severely harmed, must be evacuated; World has never
come across situation like this
30
October, 2013
Physician
Akira Sugenoya, mayor of the city of Matsumoto interviewed by VoR,
Oct. 30, 2013: “Immediately following the accident at the Fukushima
nuclear power plant, I started saying that children should not be
allowed to live on the contaminated territory [it] weakens children’s
immune system and severely harms their health [...] Children are a
lot more vulnerable to radiation than adults. [...] I want to repeat
once again that children should be relocated to clean, radiation-free
areas at least temporarily. [...] is it feasible to quickly and
effectively do away with radioactive pollution? I am absolutely
certain that it is unfeasible. [...] Compared to Chernobyl, the
situation in Japan is further aggravated by radioactive water
leakages. The world has never ever come across this kind of
situation. [...] We should admit that radioactive water is a grave
problem. The threat that children may have been contaminated with
radioactive materials still looms large. We shouldn’t remain
indifferent to the challenges we are facing.”
Hiroko
Goto, Professor at Chiba University School of Law & Vice
President of Human Rights Now,
Published June 29, 2013 (At
10:00 in):
The second one is very problematic — New residential support plan
for evacuees from outside Fukushima — this mainly focuses on the
pregnant women and the children. If the pregnant women or children
decide to go back to Fukushima, Fukushima Prefecture will offer a
new, very good house without payment. And this kind of policy they
introduce means that the local government wants the people back to
their area. So this is a very not good situation for the women’s
and children’s health.
Warning
from Japan’s Top Nuclear Official: I am “much more worried”
about fuel in Fukushima Unit 4
- Rods may break open and release highly radioactive material
- Beware risks from debris, a disaster if damaged
- Removal may start Nov. 8
30
October, 2013
Associated
Press,
Oct. 30, 2013: Japanese regulators on Wednesday gave final
approval for the removal of fuel rods [to] start in November [...]
About 200 of the rods that are unused and safer are expected to be
the first [...] Nuclear regulatory chairman Shunichi Tanaka, however,
warned that removing the fuel rods from Unit 4 would be difficult
because of the risk posed by debris that fell into the pool during
the explosions. “It’s a totally different operation than removing
normal fuel rods from a spent fuel pool,” Tanaka said at a regular
news conference. “They need to be handled extremely carefully and
closely monitored. You should never rush or force them out, or they
may break.” He said it would be a disaster if fuel rods are pulled
forcibly and are damaged or break open when dropped from the pool,
located about 30 meters (100 feet) above ground, releasing highly
radioactive material. “I’m much more worried about this than
contaminated water,” Tanaka said. [...]
Channel
4 (UK),
Oct. 15, 2013: The worst case scenario is if the fuel assemblies are
dropped, which could ultimately lead to a partial meltdown [...]
VoA
News,
Oct. 15, 2013: That hydrogen explosion [...] left the inside of the
pool littered with debris. [...] TEPCO’s first task is to remove
the debris. [...] The fuel rods must be kept submerged and must
not touch each other or break. Nuclear experts warn any mishaps could
cause an explosion many times worse than in March 2011.
NHK
WORLD,
Oct 30, 2013: [...] The firm hopes to begin the removal at the
facility’s Number 4 reactor on November 8th. Tokyo Electric plans
to check whether the rods are damaged by debris that fell into the
pool in March 2011, and to ensure that they do not get caught in the
debris during the removal process. [...]
Japan
Gov’t:“Unprecedented situation of radioactive pollution” from
Fukushima disaster
“Intensive
Contamination Areas” designated near downtown Tokyo, and officials
there say health assistance for kids and pregnant women is needed
30
October, 2013
Ministry
of the Environment, Government of Japan:
The “Act on Special Measures Concerning the Handling of Radioactive
Pollution” was enacted in August 2011, in response to the
unprecedented situation of radioactive pollution after the accident
at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. [...] a new
policy framework for the off-site decontamination has been arranged
[...] There are two categories of contaminated areas under the Act.
The first one is the “Special Decontamination Area”, where
decontamination is implemented by the national government. It
includes 11 municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture. The second one is
the “Intensive Contamination Survey Area”, where decontamination
is implemented by each municipality with financial and technical
supports by the national government. [...]
Mainichi,
Sept. 24, 2013: Municipalities
criticize gov’t agency for limiting Fukushima disaster aid
[...] At least 13 municipalities in Chiba, Ibaraki and Tochigi
prefectures have sent critical comments to the Reconstruction Agency
for its basic policy to limit the scope of assistance to only areas
in Fukushima Prefecture [...] Those municipalities are: Noda, Kashiwa
[~10 miles from downtown Tokyo], Kamagaya [~10 mi], Matsudo [~5 mi],
Shiroi [~10 mi], Nagareyama [~5 mi], Sakura [~20 mi], Abiko [~10 mi]
and Inzai [~20 mi] in Chiba Prefecture; Toride [~15 mi], Moriya [~15
mi], and Joso [~20 mi] in Ibaraki Prefecture; and Nasushiobara in
Tochigi Prefecture. [...] The central government sets the maximum
permissible amount of radiation exposure per year for the general
public at 1 millisievert (0.23 microsieverts per hour). The
government designated those areas (municipalities) that were exposed
to radiation exceeding the permissible limit as “Intensive
Contamination Survey Areas,” and has since been providing
assistance to them. Currently, 100 municipalities in eight
prefectures are designated as “Intensive Contamination Survey
Areas,” and the 13 municipalities are among them. [...] all of the
13 municipal governments called for attaching importance to health
assistance for children and pregnant women. They are critical of the
government for applying “double standards” with the
decontamination law and the nuclear disaster aid law. [...]
World
Nuclear News,
Sept. 18, 2013 (Emphasis
Added):
[...] In the
Intensive Contamination Areas,
decontamination work is being implemented based on plans developed at
the municipal level, with some municipalities setting targets of five
years to complete the work and others choosing a timescale of two to
three years. [...]
Tokyo
Mother: “Total media blackout” in Japan of lots and lots of
people developing symptoms related to Fukushima disaster —
“Many
cases of sickness and death among young generations” not reported
30
October, 2013
World
Network For Saving Children From Radiation,
Oct. 26, 2013: [...] A case like this is just a tip of iceburg [...]
IKKO is a Buddhist monk. His life is ending. He is only 34 years old
and lives in Hiwada town [near Koriyama] in Fukushima. He had a heart
attack two days ago, and his doctor announced brain death. He is now
connected to life-support. My sister in Fukushima knows him through
her student [...] She and IKKO got engaged and were planning to get
married next year. She has just lost her father from cancer last
April. He had worked at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant [...] My sister
was present when IKKO had a heartattack and is in disbelief of what
is taking place since he was fine before this [...] There have been
many cases of sickness and death among young generations in Fukushima
although it is not reported by media.
Mother
from Tokyo, Japan during Q & A at Cinema Forum Fukushima,
Published July 3, 2013 (at
2:20 in):
In Japan, it’s really a total blackout of media, even though there
are lots and lots of people who have been developing symptoms. That
information itself cannot come out because of the control of the
media and the doctors, like the Society of Medicine in Japan, are
denying even now that there have been health damages [...] I just
wanted to remind you that this is really a real thing. It’s not
only the anxiety, it is happening. I think this is the most important
thing. But there are very few people who talk about this […] I was
outside on the 15th of March in Tokyo, and then about 1 month later,
I had fever of like 103ºF for 8 days. And this [baby] boy, he was
totally healthy, now he’s OK, but at the time he had 101ºF fever
on and off for 13 times in the duration of 3 months. He had rash all
over and he was really, really sick [...] he became real skinny and
he stopped growing for 3 or 4 months. It is really happening. I have
2 nodules in my thyroid, and my boy has countless number of minor
nodules. So what I wanted to stress most, the most important thing is
the symptoms are happening. I want you to know, and I want you to
spread this information.
Other headlines -
11:03
AM EST on October 30th, 2013 | 85
comments
Why are they ‘speeding up’ at Unit 4? — Expert in 2010: Megathrust quake to hit Fukushima ~Nov. 2013… Recurrence interval of 75 years with last rupture Nov. 1938 — Planet’s most powerful type of seismic event — WSJ: Top official concerned quake to destabilize fuel pool
06:57 PM EST on October 29th, 2013 | 10 comments
For first time, officials admit to ‘shortage of workers’ at Fukushima — Tepco promises ‘additional efforts’ to get more — BBC reveals homeless people cleaning reactors and “modern slavery” in Japan nuclear industry… exactly 14 years ago
Fukushima:
Beyond Urgent ☢ (Platos Cave Mirror)
A
great compilation of info for those who are new to Fukushima Nuclear
Meltdown (and/or a quick synopsis) and the probable catastrophic
outcome. More date to follow. However, this is a great intro for
those who know nothing about the damage to the nuclear plant, the
radioactive fallout coming across the pacific. I suppose you could
call this "class" of information sharing: Getting to know
you radioactive fallout (sorry I showed up tardy to class). Teacher
then informs student: sit down and listen....
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.