“The
only advice I can give is that when you hear the presstitute media
smear a concern or explanation as “conspiracy theory,” have a
closer look. The divergence between what is happening and what you
are told is so vast that it pays to be suspicious, cynical even, of
what “your” government and “your” presstitute media tell you.
The chances are high that it is a lie.”
---Paul
Craig Roberts
Ignored
Reality Is Going To Wipe Out the Human Race — Paul Craig Roberts
Paul
Craig Roberts
28
October, 2013
To
inform people is hard slugging. Everything is lined up against the
public being informed, or the policymakers for that matter. News is
contaminated by its service to special interests and hidden agendas.
Many scientists or their employers are dependent on federal money.
Even psychologists and anthropologists were roped into the
government’s torture and occupation programs. Economists tell lies
for corporations and Wall Street. Plant and soil scientists tell lies
for agribusiness and Monsanto. Truth tellers are slandered and
persecuted. However, persistence can eventually win out. In the
long-run, truth sometimes emerges. But not always. And not always in
time.
I
have been trying to inform the American people, economists, and
policymakers for more than a decade about the adverse impacts of jobs
offshoring on the US economy. The word has eventually gotten out.
Last week I was contacted by 8th grade students competing for their
school in CSPAN’s StudentCam Documentary Contest. They want to
interview me on the subject of jobs offshoring for their documentary
film.
America
is a strange place. Here are eighth graders far ahead of the
economics profession, the President, the Congress, the Federal
Reserve, Wall Street, and the financial press in their understanding
of one of the fundamental problems of the US economy. Yet, people say
the public schools are failing. Obviously, not the one whose students
contacted me.
Is
it too late? I know much, but not all. So this is not the final word.
I think it might be too late. When skilled jobs are sent abroad, the
skills disappear at home. So do the supply chains and the businesses
associated with the skills. Things close down, and abilities are
lost. Why take a major in collage for a job that is offshored. A
culture disappears.
But
we can start them back up, right? Perhaps not. When a First World
country exports its technology and know-how abroad to a Third World
country in order to benefit from lower cost labor, how does the First
World country get the work back? Living standards and the cost of
living in Third World countries are much lower than in First World
countries. The populations of First World countries cannot pay their
mortgages, car payments, student loans, medical care, and grocery
bills with the wages of Third World countries.
When
First World wages drop, mortgage, car, credit card, and student loan
payments do not drop. Americans cannot live on Chinese, Indian, and
Indonesian wages. Once the technology and know-how is transferred,
the low wage country has the advantage in the absence of tariff
protection.
For
America to revive, our economy would have to be walled off with high
tariffs, and subsidies would have to be provided in order to recreate
US industry and manufacturing. But many corporations now produce
offshore, and America is broke. The government has been $1 trillion
dollars in the hole each year for the last 5 years.
Jobs
offshoring diminished the US tax base. When a job is sent abroad, so
is that job’s contribution to US GDP and tax base. When millions of
jobs are sent abroad, US GDP and tax base cannot support government
spending levels. To the extent that there are any replacement jobs,
they are in lowly paid domestic services, such as waitresses,
bartenders, retail clerks, and hospital orderlies. These jobs do not
provide a tax base or consumer spending power comparable to
manufacturing jobs and tradable professional services such as
software engineering and information technology.
Republicans
and increasingly Democrats, as both parties are dependent on the same
sources of campaign contributions, blame “entitlements.” By
entitlements they mean welfare.
In
fact, entitlements consist of Social Security and Medicare.
Entitlements are funded by the payroll tax, approximately 15% of
payroll. The fact that a person pays the payroll tax all his working
life is why the person is entitled to Social Security and Medicare if
they live to retirement age. Welfare, such as food stamps and housing
subsidies, are a small part of the federal budget and are not
entitlements.
Every
since President Reagan was betrayed three decades ago by Alan
Greenspan and David Stockman, both of whom sold out to Wall Street
and raised the Social Security payroll tax above what was needed to
pay Social Security benefits in order to protect Wall Street’s
stock and bond portfolios from exaggerated deficit fears, Social
Security payroll tax revenues have exceeded Social Security payments.
As of today, Social Security revenues exceed payments to
beneficiaries by an accumulated $2 trillion. The money was used by
the federal government to pay for its wars and other spending
programs. The Social Security Trust Fund holds non-marketable IOUs
from the Treasury. These IOUs can only be made good from an excess of
tax revenues over expenditures or by the Treasury selling $2 trillion
in bonds, notes, and bills and paying off its IOUs to the Social
Security Trust Fund. This is not going to happen.
The
Federal Reserve could not care less about the US population. The Fed
was established for the purpose of protecting and aiding banks.
Currently, the Fed, as if America were a Banana Republic which
America appears to be becoming, is printing one thousand billion
dollars per year in order to support the banks and to finance the
federal deficit.
This
is bad news for Americans, as it means that their fiat money is being
created at a far greater rate than the demand for the dollar. The
implication for our future is a drop in the dollar’s value. As
there are no jobs, a drop in the dollar’s value means high
inflation on top of unemployment and double the misery of the Great
Depression.
As
bad as this is, it is minor compared to the destruction of the
planet’s environment. Online information shows that the Gulf of
Mexico ecosystem is in crisis after the BP spill and use of Corexit,
a dispersant used to hide, not clean up, the spilled oil.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Gulf-ecosystem-in-crisis-a-by-Dahr-Jamail-Corporation-BP_Ecosystems_Gulf-Oil-Spill-Disaster_Gulf-Shrimping-Industry-131020-15.html
The
Fukushima catastrophe has hardly begun. Yet already the radioactive
water pouring into the Pacific Ocean has made fish dangerous to eat
unless a person is willing to accept a higher risk of cancer.
Fukushima
has the potential of making Japan uninhabitable and of polluting the
air, water, and soil of the US with radioactivity. Yet the crisis is
seldom mentioned in the US media. In Japan the government just passed
a law that could be used to imprison Japanese journalists who report
truthfully on the dire situation.
Take
the time to familiarize yourself with the online information about
Fukushima.. According to the presstitute media, Americans face
threats from Iran and Syria and from whistleblowers such as Edward
Snowden. The real threats are simply not in the news.
If
you search Fukushima, you will find information that the presstitute
media hides from you. See for example,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/28-signs-that-the-west-coast-is-being-absolutely-fried-with-nuclear-radiation-from-fukushima/5355280
There
are a number of other threats to the environment on which our lives
depend. One is the effort to extract more productivity from the soil
by use of GMOs. Monsanto has altered the genes of several crops so
that the crops can be sprayed with RoundUp to eliminate weeds. The
results have been to deplete the soil of nutrients, to destroy the
micro-biology of the soil so that new plant diseases and funguses are
activated, and to produce superweeds that require heavier doses of
the glyphosate in RoundUp. The heavier dose of RoundUp worsens the
aforementioned problems. US agricultural soil is losing its potency.
Now
we come to chemtrails, branded another “conspiracy theory.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory However, the
US government’s efforts to geo-engineer weather as a military
weapon and as a preventative of global warming appear to be real. The
DARPA and HAARP programs are well known and are discussed publicly by
scientists. See, for example,
http://news.sciencemag.org/2009/03/darpa-explore-geoengineering
Search Chemtrails, and you will find much information that is kept
from you. See, for example,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/chemtrails-a-planetary-catastrophe-created-by-geo-engineering/5355299
and http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org
Some
describe chemtrails as a plot by the New World Order, the Rothchilds,
the Bilderbergers, or the Masons, to wipe out the “useless eaters.”
Given the amount of evil that exists in the world, these conspiracy
theories might not be as farfetched as they sound.
However,
I do not know that. What does seem to be possibly true is that the
scientific experiments to modify and control weather are having
adverse real world consequences. The claim that aluminum is being
sprayed into the atmosphere and when it comes to earth is destroying
the ability of soil to be productive might not be imaginary. Those
concerned about chemtrails say that weather control experiments have
deprived the western United States of rainfall, while sending the
rain to the east where there have been hurricane level deluges and
floods.
In
the West, sparse rainfall and lightening storms without rain are
resulting in forests drying out and burning down. Deforestation
adversely affects the environment in many ways, including the process
of photosynthesis by which trees convert carbon dioxide into oxygen.
The massive loss of forests means more carbon dioxide and less
oxygen. Watershed and species habitat are lost, and spreading aridity
further depletes ground and surface water. If these results are the
consequences of weather modification experiments, the experiments
should be stopped.
In
North Georgia where I spend some summers, during 2013 it rained for
60 consecutive days, not all day, but every day, and some days the
rainfall was 12 inches–hurricane level–and roads were washed out.
I received last summer 4 automated telephone warnings from local
counties not to drive and not to attempt to drive through
accumulations of water on the highways.
One
consequence of the excess of water in the East is that this year
there are no acorns in North Georgia. Zilch, zero, nada. Nothing.
There is no food for the deer, the turkeys, the bear, the rodents.
Starving deer will strip bark from the trees. Bears will be unable to
hibernate or will be able only to partially hibernate, forced to seek
food from garbage. Black bears are already invading homes in search
of food.
Unusual
drought in the West and unusual flood in the East could be
coincidental or they could be consequences of weather modification
experiments.
The
US, along with most of the world, already had a water problem prior
to possible disruptions of rainfall by geo-engineering. In his book,
Elixir, Brian Fagan tells the story of humankind’s mostly
unsuccessful struggle with water. Both groundwater and surface water
are vanishing. The water needs of large cities, such as Los Angeles
and Phoenix, and the irrigation farming that depends on the Ogallala
aquifer are unsustainable. Fagan reminds us that “the world’s
supply of freshwater is finite,” just like the rest of nature’s
resources. Avoiding cataclysm requires long-range thinking, but
humanity is focused on immediate needs. Long-range thinking is
limited to finding another water source to deplete. Cities and
agriculture have turned eyes to the Great Lakes.
Los
Angeles exists because the city was able to steal water from hundreds
of miles away. The city drained Owens Lake, leaving a huge salt flat
in its place, drained the Owens Valley aquifer, and diverted the
Owens River to LA via aqueduct. Farming and ranching in the Owens
Valley collapsed. Today LA takes water from the Colorado River, which
originates in Wyoming and Colorado, and from Lake Perris 440 miles
away.
Water
depletion is not just an American problem. Fagan reports that
“underground aquifers in many places are shrinking so rapidly that
NASA satellites are detecting changes in the earth’s gravity.”
If
the government is experimenting with weather engineering, scientists
are playing God when they have no idea of the consequences. It is a
tendency of scientists to become absorbed by the ability to
experiment and to ignore unintended consequences.
Readers
have asked me to write about Fukushima and chemtrails because they
trust me to tell them the truth. The problem is that I am not
qualified to write about these matters with anything approaching the
same confidence that I bring to economic, war and police state
matters.
The
only advice I can give is that when you hear the presstitute media
smear a concern or explanation as “conspiracy theory,” have a
closer look. The divergence between what is happening and what you
are told is so vast that it pays to be suspicious, cynical even, of
what “your” government and “your” presstitute media tell you.
The chances are high that it is a lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.