New
Mexico is the driest of the dry
As
an extended drought bakes the West, nowhere are ravages of changes in
the climate worse than in New Mexico.
6
August, 2013
Scientists
in the West have a particular way of walking a landscape and divining
its secrets: They kick a toe into loamy soil or drag a boot heel
across the desert's crust, leaning down to squint at the tiny
excavation.
Try
that maneuver in New Mexico these days and it yields nothing but bad
news in a puff of dust.
Across
the West, changes in the climate are taking a toll. Almost 87% of the
region is in a drought.
Nevada
is removing wild horses and stocks of cattle from federal rangelands,
Wyoming is seeding clouds as part of a long-term "weather
modification program," officials in Colorado say the state's
southeastern plains are experiencing Dust Bowl conditions, and the
entire western U.S. has been beset by more frequent and ferocious
wildfires across an ever-more combustible landscape.
But
nowhere is it worse than in New Mexico. In this parched state, the
question is no longer how much worse it can get but whether it will
ever get better — and, ominously, whether collapsing ecosystems can
recover even if it does.
The
statistics are sobering: All of New Mexico is officially in a
drought, and three-quarters of it is categorized as severe or
exceptional. Reservoir storage statewide is 17% of normal, lowest in
the West. Residents of some towns subsist on trucked-in water, and
others are drilling deep wells costing $100,000 or more to sink and
still more to operate.
New
Mexico drought
The
American West is experiencing a devastating drought, but no state is
more parched than New Mexico. The entire state is officially in
drought, and scientists, farmers and ranchers are trying to figure
out how to cope with this new dry reality.
Wildlife
managers are hauling water to elk herds in the mountains and blaming
the drought for the unusually high number of deer and antelope killed
on New Mexico's highways, surmising that the animals are taking
greater risks to find water.
Thousands
of Albuquerque's trees have died as homeowners under water
restrictions can't afford to water them, and in the state's
agricultural belt, low yields and crop failures are the norm.
Livestock levels in many areas are about one-fifth of normal, and
panicked ranchers face paying inflated prices for hay or moving or
selling their herds.
The
last three years have been the driest and warmest since
record-keeping began here in 1895. Chuck Jones, a senior
meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Albuquerque, said
even the state's recent above-average monsoon rains "won't make
a dent" in the drought; deficits will require several years of
normal rainfall to erase, should normal rain ever arrive.
With
water supplies at the breaking point and no relief in sight, a
domino-effect water war has broken out, which might be a harbinger of
the West's future. Texas has filed suit, arguing that groundwater
pumping in New Mexico is reducing Texas' share of the Rio Grande.
Oklahoma has successfully fended off a legal challenge from Texas
over water from the Red River.
John
Clayshulte's shadow is cast over drought-parched land where some of
his pecan trees are planted near Las Cruces, N.M. He's had to remove
his cattle from a federal grazing allotment. "This used to be
shortgrass prairies," he says. "We've ruined it and it's
never going to come back."
New
Mexico's stretch of the once-mighty Rio Grande is so dewatered that,
sadly but aptly, it is referred to as the "Rio Sand."
The
question many here are grappling with is whether the changes are a
permanent result of climate change or part of cyclical weather cycle.
Jones, a member of the governor's drought task force, is cautious
about identifying three years of extreme drought as representing a
new climate pattern for New Mexico. It could be a multi-year
aberration.
Nonetheless,
most long-term plans put together by cattle ranchers, farmers and
land managers include the probability that the drought is here to
stay.
John
Clayshulte, a third-generation rancher and farmer near Las Cruces,
removed all his cattle from his federal grazing allotment. "There's
just not any sense putting cows on there. There's not enough for them
to eat," he said.
"It's
all changed. This used to be shortgrass prairies. We've ruined it and
it's never going to come back."
Kris
Havstad punched his boot into the sunbaked ground and grunted.
Havstad, a range expert with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
joined a group of other biologists and land managers on a recent tour
of government rangeland north of Las Cruces.
Federal
scientists are grimly watching a rare ecological phenomenon unfold
here, a catastrophic alteration known as "state change" —
the collapse of the vast Chihuahuan Desert grasslands ecosystem and
its transformation into a sandy, scrub desert affording little forage
for wildlife or livestock.
A
battered sign seems to sum up the mood in the driest parts of New
Mexico, where many ranchers have had to remove their herds from
federal grazing allotments.
Carpeting
the landscape in lush waves, Black Grama grass had long been the
signature of the 140,000-square-mile Chihuahuan Desert. But
overgrazing and persistent drought have hit hard here, reducing the
grass to small, stiff tufts, sparsely spaced.
The
10,000-year-old desert is changing, scientists say. Grasses are in a
cycle of collapse, overwhelmed by hardy and long-lived shrubs such as
mesquite and creosote.
Havstad
picks at a mesquite seed pod, noting that absent any grass, hungry
livestock are consuming them. "They are not terribly
nutritious," he said. "It's like being the last one at the
buffet and the only thing left is snow peas."
With
only shrubs available to eat, the land is losing its ability to feed
the cattle that graze here. So little grass remains that a square
mile — 640 acres — can sustain just three to five cows in current
conditions. A healthy desert can handle five times as many.
This
federal land and the adjacent Jornada Experimental Range offer a
trove of data for climate study. The research station has kept
monthly precipitation data since 1915, and the federal Bureau of Land
Management has historical photographs of plots throughout the region
that provide a time-lapse map of change.
In
one spot, a photograph dating to the 1960s shows a lush grassy
square. As the group of scientists flips through the pictures, over
time the plot becomes stripped of vegetation. The photographs depict
inexorable change.
Jim
McCormick is the Bureau of Land Management's assistant district
manager for the area. He said his staff had spent time and prodigious
sums of money in a program to help the land recover from a century of
harsh climate and cattle grazing.
"Then
came the drought to undo all our work," he said.
The
bureau oversees much of the region, which includes one of the largest
public grazing areas in the country. The agency has asked ranchers to
remove their cattle from a number of pastures for a year or two to
allow the land to rest. In many cases, officials say, ranchers are
taking their livestock off voluntarily.
The
demise of native grasses during the drought, thought to be the worst
since the 1950s, has been devastating to ranchers who have long
relied on grazing to feed cattle.
But
not all the damage can be blamed on cattle; nor can simply removing
them heal the landscape. An altered climate is now the biggest driver
pushing the landscape-wide alterations taking place across the West.
"In
the old days, we used to think if we built a fence around it, it will
be OK," said Brandon Bestelmeyer, who conducts research on the
Jornada for the Department of Agriculture. "That thinking didn't
take into account climate change. These kind of state changes are
catastrophic changes. They can be irreversible."
As
vegetation dies off and the process of desertification accelerates,
Bestelmeyer said, the Chihuahuan Desert will expand. As Western
cities continue their march into wildlands, the growing desert and
the sprawling suburbs are on a collision course.
Bestelmeyer,
a landscape ecologist, describes what's at stake: "If we lose
the grasslands, grazing is over, and the generations of people who
depend on grazing will lose their livelihoods."
Biodiversity
will decline as wildlife and bird species move away or die off.
Moreover, a denuded landscape loses its ability to transport water to
recharge aquifers, a crucial resource in the desert.
Finally,
he said, without vegetation to hold soils in place, dust and sand
will be on the move and encroach onto roads, crops, homes and
businesses.
"You
don't want a Sahara here," Bestelmeyer said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.