Peace Talks “Paused” After Putin’s Triumph in Aleppo
by MIKE
WHITNEY
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/05/peace-talks-paused-after-putins-triumph-in-aleppo/
“This is the beginning of the end of jihadi presence in Aleppo. After 4 years of war and terror, people can finally see the end in sight.”
— Edward Dark, Twitter, Moon of Alabama
A
last ditch effort to stop a Russian-led military offensive in
northern Syria ended in failure on Wednesday when the Syrian Arab
Army (SAA) backed by the National Defense Forces (NDF) and heavy
Russian air cover broke a 40-month siege on the villages of Nubl and
al-Zahra in northwestern Aleppo province. The Obama administration
had hoped that it could forestall the onslaught by cobbling together
an eleventh-hour ceasefire agreement at the Geneva peace talks.
But when the news that Syrian armored units had crashed through al
Nusra’s defenses and forced the jihadists to retreat, UN envoy
Staffan de Mistura suspended the negotiations tacitly acknowledging
that the mission had failed.
“I
have indicated from the first day that I won’t talk for the sake
of talking,” the envoy told reporters, saying he needed immediate
help from international backers led by the United States and Russia,
which are supporting opposite sides of a war that has also drawn in
regional powers.” (Reuters) De Mistura then announced a
“temporary pause” in the stillborn negotiations which had
only formally begun just hours earlier. Developments on the
battlefield had convinced the Italian-Swedish diplomat that it was
pointless to continue while government forces were effecting a
solution through military means.
After
months of grinding away at enemy positions across the country,
the Russian strategy has begun to bear fruit. Loyalist ground forces
have made great strides on the battlefield rolling back the
war-weary insurgents on virtually all fronts. A broad swathe of the
Turkish border is now under SAA control while the ubiquitous Russian
bombers continue to inflict heavy losses on demoralized anti-regime
militants. Wednesday’s lightening attack on the strategic towns
of Nubl and Zahraa was just the icing on the cake. The
bold maneuver severed critical supply-lines to Turkey
while tightening the military noose around the
country’s largest city leaving hundreds of terrorists stranded in
a battered cauldron with no way out.
For
the last two weeks, the Obama team has been following developments
on the ground with growing concern. This is why Secretary of
State John Kerry hurriedly assembled a diplomatic mission to convene
emergency peace talks in Geneva despite the fact that the various
participants had not even agreed to attend. A sense of urgency
bordering on panic was palpable from the onset. The goal was never
to achieve a negotiated settlement or an honorable peace, but (as
Foreign Policy magazine noted) to implement “a broad ‘freeze’
over the whole province of Aleppo, which would then be replicated in
other regions later.” This was the real objective, to stop the
bleeding any way possible and prevent the inevitable encirclement
of Aleppo.
The
recapturing of Nubl and Zahraa leaves the jihadists with just one
route for transporting weapons, food and fuel to their urban
stronghold. When loyalist forces break the blockade at Bab al Hawa
to the northeast, the loop will be closed, the perimeter will
tighten, the cauldron will be split into smaller enclaves
within the city, and the terrorists will either surrender or face
certain annihilation. Wednesday’s triumph by the Russian-led
coalition is a sign that that day may be approaching sooner than
anyone had anticipated.
It’s
worth noting, that a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution,
Michael O’Hanlon– whose plan to “deconstruct Syria” by using
“moderate elements” to “produce autonomous
zones”–advised Obama and Kerry “not to pursue the failed logic
of the current Syria peace talks but to explore a confederal model
and seek buy-in from as many key players and allies as possible.”
In other words, the main architect of the US plan to break up Syria
into smaller areas, (controlled by local militias, warlords and
jihadists) thought the peace talks were “doomed” from the very
beginning.
According
to O’Hanlon the US needs to commit “20,000 combat troops”
with “the right political model for maintaining
occupation”. The Brookings analyst says that
“Any ceasefire that Kerry could negotiate…would be built on a
foundation of sand” for the mere fact that the “moderate”
forces it would support would be much weaker than either the SAA or
ISIS. That means there would be no way to enforce the final
settlement and no army strong enough to establish the authority of
the new “unity” government.
O’Hanlon’s
comments suggest western elites are deeply divided over Syria.
The hawks are still pushing for more intervention, greater US, EU,
and NATO involvement, and American and allied “boots on
the ground” to occupy the country for an undetermined amount of
time. In contrast, the Obama administration wants to
minimize its commitment while trying desperately to placate its
critics.
That
means Syria’s troubles could resurface again in the
future when Obama steps down and a new
president pursues a more muscular strategy. A number
of powerful people in the ruling establishment are as
determined-as-ever to partition Syria and install a US puppet
in Damascus. That’s not going to change. The Russian-led coalition
has a small window for concluding its operations, eliminating the
terrorists, and reestablishing security across the country. Ending
the war as soon as possible, while creating a safe environment for
Syrian refugees to return home, is the best way to reduce the
threat of escalation and discourage future US adventurism. But
Putin will have to move fast for the plan to work.
Excerpts
from: “Deconstructing
Syria: A new strategy for America’s most hopeless war“,
Michael O’ Hanlon, Brookings Institute.
MIKE
WHITNEY lives
in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless:
Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK
Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle
edition. He
can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.