NY
to probe 'radioactive' water leak at Indian Point
5 February, 2016
ALBANY - New York will investigate the Indian Point Energy Center after Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he learned that "radioactive tritium-contaminated water" leaked into the groundwater at the nuclear facility in Westchester County.
Buy Photo
http://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/politics-on-the-hudson/2016/02/06/ny-probe-radioactive-water-leak-indian-point/79929984/5 February, 2016
ALBANY - New York will investigate the Indian Point Energy Center after Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he learned that "radioactive tritium-contaminated water" leaked into the groundwater at the nuclear facility in Westchester County.
Cuomo,
in a letter Saturday to the state Health Department and the
Department of Environmental Conservation, called for the probe after
he said Entergy Corp., the Buchanan plant's owner, reported
"alarming levels of radioactivity" at three monitoring
wells.
While
the facility reported that the contamination has not migrated
off site and did not pose an immediate public health
threat, Cuomo said that the incident requires a full
investigation.
"Our first concern is for the health and safety of the residents close to the facility and ensuring the groundwater leak does not pose a threat," said Cuomo, who lives in New Castle, Westchester County.
"Our first concern is for the health and safety of the residents close to the facility and ensuring the groundwater leak does not pose a threat," said Cuomo, who lives in New Castle, Westchester County.
Entergy
spokesperson Jerry Nappi said through an email that the elevated
levels of tritium are more than a thousand times below federal
limits, and there is no health risks to the
public. Drinking water sources both onsite and offsite were not
affected.
"While
elevated tritium in the ground onsite is not in accordance with our
standards, there is no health or safety consequence to the public,"
Nappi said in the email.
Entergy
voluntarily notified the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
state agencies and stakeholders about the elevated levels of tritium
in the monitoring wells, Nappi said.
Tritium,
which is a radioactively weak isotope of hydrogen, likely
reached the ground at Indian Point during recent work activities,
Nappi said. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed around
the nuclear plant to provide early detection of any
elevated levels of radionuclides in the ground.
Buchanan
Mayor Theresa Knickerbocker said Entergy informed local
officials on Friday about the elevated levels of tritium.
Entergy, Knickerbocker said, has "always been upfront” and
kept us “informed about what’s going on over there.”
Residents
were not contacted about the recent finding because Entergy officials
said there was no threat to public safety, Knickerbocker
said. “My concern is for public health and safety," she
said, but we were assured “there was not a threat to public health
or safety.”
The
findings of contamination drew harsh criticisms from state
Assemblywoman Ellen Jaffee, D-Suffern, who said in a released statement that this was not the "first time Entergy's operation and maintenance has failed." The nuclear power plant, Jaffee added, "cannot continue to operate as it has without a full and thorough investigation of this incident."
Assemblywoman Ellen Jaffee, D-Suffern, who said in a released statement that this was not the "first time Entergy's operation and maintenance has failed." The nuclear power plant, Jaffee added, "cannot continue to operate as it has without a full and thorough investigation of this incident."
"My
primary concern is the potential impact this tritium-contaminated
water may have on the health and safety of those who live nearby but
also the impact this radioactive water may have on public health and
our environment," Jaffee said in the statement.
The
Buchanan plant, which supplies about 30 percent of the energy to New
York City, has been under increased scrutiny from Cuomo's office, and
the Democratic governor supports closing the plant — even as he
supports keeping open two
other upstate nuclear facilities.
Cuomo
said the “latest failure at Indian Point is unacceptable."
He
said the DEC and health department should "employ all available
measures, including working with Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to
determine the extent of the release, its likely duration, cause and
potential impacts to the environment and public health.”
In
December, Cuomo ordered an investigation into Indian Point
after a
series of unplanned shutdowns,
citing its risks being just outside the city and in the populated
suburbs. A month later, Entergy filed
suit against Secretary of State Cesar Perales in
federal court, seeking a court order to toss out the state's
refusal to grant the power plant a certificate to operate on the
Hudson River.
Perales,
a member of Cuomo’s cabinet, rejected
Entergy’s request for a Coastal Zone certificate on
Nov. 6 to use the Hudson River. In a letter to Entergy,
Perales said for the past 40 years the plant has been "damaging
the coastal resources of the Hudson River,” withdrawing billions of
gallons of water a day, and killing at least a billion
fish.
Since
2007, Entergy has been seeking to extend its licenses for Indian
Point’s two reactors, Units 2 and 3, for 20 more years. In
December, the plant’s Unit 3 reactor eclipsed
its original 40-year licensing period —
a mark that the plant’s Unit 2 reactor reached in September 2013.
Buy
Photo
A
view of the Indian Point nuclear power plant, photographed from
Peekskill. (Photo: Joe
Larese/The Journal News)
The
nuclear power plant can continue to operate until the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission decides on its application — a
process that will take several years, Nappi said.
Plant
opponents have cited numerous shutdowns in 2015 as red flags of an
aging infrastructure.
On
Dec. 7, a malfunctioning roof fan caused
the plant’s Unit 2 reactor to shut down for
three days. On Dec. 14, the plant’s Unit 3 reactor was
shut down for nearly three daysdue
to an electrical disturbance.
Earlier
in 2015, Indian Point was
shut down 19 days in
May and July due to a May 7 steam leak; a May 9 transformer failure,
which spilled about 3,000 gallons of oil into the Hudson River;
a July
8 pump motor failure;
and a June
15 switchyard-breaker failure in
a Consolidated Edison substation near the power plant.
Staff
writer Michael D'Onofrio contributed to this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.