A
major article.
Coming
to a head in Syria
by
Ghassan Kadi
5
February, 2016
What
started as a “War On Syria”, allowed to grow and fester unabated,
fueled and sponsored by eighty three nations spearheaded by Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel and NATO and all pro-NATO nations, is
undoubtedly coming to a head.
Geneva
III seems dead in the water, just like Geneva I and II were. This
time however, Syria and its allies are calling the shots, and they
are playing the cat-and-mouse game, and why not? After all, the ball
is in their court and it wasn’t easy coming. It’s the spoil of
blood and sacrifice.
That
said, whichever way one looks at what I call the “War On Syria”
or truly believe it is a revolution and choose to call it the “Syrian
Revolution” or any other name for that matter, recent events are
indicating a coming to head; one way or the other.
The
time of stalemates has long gone. If anything, the stalemates were
the result of a series of stagnant conditions on the battlefield
which didn’t allow for victors or losers to emerge except in
certain specific areas, but as the Syrian Army is now making sweeping
advances in many territories and on many fronts under the aerial
support of Russia, the stalemate is no longer.
Any
whichever way one looks at the recent developments in Syria,
favourably, unfavourably, or indifferently, one has to be able to see
that there are some serious changes on the horizon. Those changes
will eventually culminate into new directions and the coming to head
of an outcome cannot be too far away.
Some
of the head figures that were involved in the original orchestration
of the “War On Syria” have already faced their own coming to head
and came down crashing. Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan was perhaps
the most infamous “victim”. Few conspirers throughout history
have fallen on their own swords in a more humiliating manner than the
way he was demoted from a potential crown prince and king to a
virtual nobody.
The
outcome that has thus far been achieved by the collaboration of the
aerial Russian might with the Syrian Army on the ground is tightening
the noose on Erdogan and giving him a few bitter options. The Saudis
are not in a much better situation, but Saudi Arabia does not have
common borders with Syria and Saudi Arabia does not have Kurds.
Now
that Erdogan has finally shown his true colours to the Kurds and
spewed his hatred upon them in Syria, Iraq and within Turkey itself,
he can no longer rewind the clock and restore his pre-“War On
Syria” diplomacy status with them.
Erdogan
must be shuffling his cards, contemplating different options and
weighing out their risks. Without reaching some agreement with
Russia, he cannot save face. But his window for diplomacy with Russia
has been deadlocked and Russia will not sit at a negotiating table
with him, not after he shot down the Su-24 and had his thugs kill the
pilot as he parachuted. Realistically, he cannot emerge with any win,
modest and insignificant as it might be, without some military
action. But as his biggest military gamble in Syria was beginning to
fail even before Russia intervened, what hope of military gain does
he have now with Russia on Syrian soil and in her skies?
But
if he sits back and allows Syria to win, among other things, he will
be accepting to face serious and grave domestic repercussions. As a
matter of fact, those repercussions have already started, and a quick
look at Diyarbakir and its surrounds says it all.
The
only other option Erdogan has is to have a military showdown with
Russia, but to do this, he needs help.
The
Saudis have expressed willingness to send troops into Syria to fight
alongside the USA against Daesh (ISIS), wink wink. We all know what
this means. This is their way of saying that they intend to use
Turkey as a route and work alongside Turkish troops in attacking
Syria. Ironically however, Saudi Arabia, that has a military budget
higher than that of Russia, has not yet been even able to score a
military win in Yemen, and probably never will. The recent
announcement about sending troops into Syria sounds like a practical
joke. That said, Erdogan does not need the Saudi Army. The Turkish
Army has enough muscle power of its own, but not anywhere near strong
enough to engage with Russia, and any Saudi involvement will probably
be tokenistic. Furthermore, the Saudis might have been keen to fight
against Syria, but they will not engage in battle against Russia.
Turkey
will never be able to have a war with Russia unaided, but all
indications are that it is picking on a fight with the Big Bear in
the hope the NATO will support it. The ally Erdogan is counting on is
NATO not Saudi Arabia, and this is not such a great revelation.
Erdogan has been playing the NATO card long before the downing of the
Su-24 last November.
If
Turkey ever needed to be a NATO member, the reason was always Russia.
The animosity between the two nations is centuries old and the
dispute was not only over territory, but also religious. After all.
The Ottomans have invaded the entire region of Orthodoxy, decimated
the Byzantine Empire, and only Russia was able to spare herself from
their iron fist rule.” But as fate took a turn and the Ottoman
Empire was no longer and Russia herself became a superpower, when
NATO was founded in 1949, Turkey had no reason at all to join it
other than fear of the USSR.
For
five years now, the enemies of Syria have been pushing their luck
trying to engage the USA and NATO directly in fighting the Syrian
Army but to no avail. The so-called East Ghouta chemical attack
massacre was framed on the Syrian Army in a desperate attempt to get
a UNSC resolution akin to the one made against the government of
Libya a couple of years earlier, but this time Russia vetoed the
decision.
But
Erdogan never gave up trying to engage Uncle Sam. When he ordered his
troops to down the Su-24, it was clear that this was yet another
attempt to drag NATO into an intervention that it does not need and a
UNSC resolution, but his plea seemed to have gone to deaf ears. The
extra-ordinary NATO meeting that Erdogan immediately requested
following the incident, clearly stated that Turkey and Russia should
work together to settle their problems. That was NATO’s clear
message to Turkey to leave NATO out of it.
But
Turkey did not stop its attempts to pick on a fight with Russia. A
few days ago, unoccupied Syrian towns close to Turkish borders were
bombed as Turkey was apparently providing a cover for retreating
Jihadists. As a matter of fact, the news today is reporting Russian
awareness of a Turkish preparation for sending troops into Syria.
Russia is warning, and Erdogan is definitely stirring the pot
unabated.
With
or without NATO’s support, it takes a madman to aim for war with
Russia, but Erdogan is now as mad as a cornered rabid dog. All of his
actions, ever since the downing of the Su-24 are indicative of
getting into a military confrontation with Russia. This is what he is
aiming for. A war of this nature has the potential to develop into a
global war and a multitude of regional wars that will not only
include the super powers, but also regional powers. Millions of lives
can be lost, and no human in his/her right mind would wish it to
happen. But how can one put a harness on a madman and stop him in his
tracks?
Erdogan
is taking an enormous and dangerous gamble here, not only in
deliberately trying to engage with a superpower, but also in hoping
that NATO will come to its supposed end of the bargain.
If
a limited conflict develops between Turkey and Russia, NATO will
probably weigh in, but the question is this, if a full scale war does
break out between Russia and Turkey, will NATO enter the theater to
protect Erdogan’s hide? No one knows, but a quick guess says
unlikely.
Cynics
and critics might say that NATO, and the USA in particular, will
never let go of their regional interests in Turkey. This is true, but
defending Erdogan and defending Turkey are two different things.
If
faced between having to cut Erdogan loose to face his destiny or
engaging in an all-out war with Russia, the USA and NATO might choose
the former and sacrifice Erdogan personally. In fact, this would be a
perfect scenario for a colour revolution, and what stops America from
orchestrating one in Turkey? After all, they are the experts of
turning against their allies.
A
good look at the map of northern Syria and the recent advances of the
Syrian Army clearly indicates that the western region of that border
will soon be back into the hands of the Syrian Army, and soon could
mean a few weeks. In a few weeks, if not probably less, the city of
Aleppo will go back to the custody of the state and government of
Syria. This will constitute a huge blow to Erdogan. Considering that
the Turkish-Syrian border in the Hatay region is quite mountainous
and difficult to penetrate militarily, once it goes back to Syrian
hands, it will be virtually impossible for Turkey to take that it
back. The eastern side of the border however is quite flat and any
advancing troops will be sitting ducks for aerial attacks.
The
other risk factor for Erdogan stems from the fact that during an
election year, America is highly unlikely to commit itself to a new
war, any new war, let alone a major war with Russia.
The
fall of Erdogan on his head is bound to happen one way or the other,
and the huge popularity he gained after reforming the economy is
getting eroded gradually, and even though he won the last round of
elections, if Turkey faces more domestic strife and gets dragged by
its leader into a major war, not only the economic reforms will fall
by the wayside and push turkey back to the economic abyss, but this
will open the political doors to all possibilities, with or without a
colour revolution.
As
the clock is ticking however, and as forces loyal to Erdogan within
Syria lose more territory and nerve, Erdogan’s need to gamble
becomes more dire, and he finds himself pushed more and more into a
corner, forced to play roulette, the Russian style.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.