\John
Pilger: Why does Australia spend $28bn a year on the military and
war?
Australia,
a nation without enemies, now has an entirely colonial and obsequious
role as Washington’s “deputy sheriff” in the Asia-Pacific.
John
Pilger
29
April, 2015
FOLLOWING
a week in Australia in which the words “heroes” and “heroism”
bobbed on a tsunami of raw propaganda, a tribute is due to two
unrecognized heroes. The first is Ray Jackson, who died on 23 April.
Ray
spoke and fought for a truth which the powerful and bigoted hate to
hear, see or read. He said this was a land not of brave Anzac
“legacies”, but of dirty secrets and enduring injustices that
only a national cowardice could sustain. “Conformity is widely
understood and obeyed in Australia,” he wrote to me, “freedom is
not.”
I
first met Ray in 2004 during the Indigenous uprising in Redfern,
Sydney, that followed the violent death of a 17-year-old, Terence
Hickey. Known as “TJ”, he was chased by a police car, lost
control of his bike and was impaled on an iron fence. The police
denied they had caused his death. Not a single Aboriginal person
believed them, least of all Ray, whose campaign for justice will not
go away.
A
Wiradjuri man, Ray was stolen from his mother at the age of two and
given to a white family. The experience taught him about Australian
genocide. A lifelong socialist, his speciality was his unflagging
investigations into police thuggery towards Aboriginal people,
especially the multiple deaths in police and prison custody that
routinely go unpunished. Australia incarcerates black Australians at
a higher rate than that of apartheid South Africa.
When
Prime Minister John Howard decimated Indigenous institutions and
funding, Ray took his files and videos to his single-bedroom flat and
founded the Indigenous Social Justice Association. He fought for the
memory of young Kwementaye Briscoe, left to die in a police cell in
Alice Springs, and Brazilian Roberto Curti, tasered to death by
police in Sydney. He was the champion of countless locked-up Iraqi,
Iranian and Tamil refugees. “Never stop fighting for your freedom,”
he told them. Shaming official Australia, the French Government
awarded him one of its highest human rights laureates.
Ray
loathed warmongering and would approve of my second hero. This is
Scott McIntyre, a young SBS soccer journalist who, in four now famous
Tweets, set out to counter the authoritarian sludge that demands that
Australians celebrate the centenary of a criminal waste of life in
the British imperial invasion of Turkey a century ago — in which
Australians and New Zealanders, the “Anzacs”, took part —
rather than recognise unpalatable truths about the past and present.
Opportunistic
politicians and journalists have turned this melancholy event into a
death cult that puzzles foreigners. Federal governments have
spent almost $400 million promoting it as a fake patriotism – more
than Britain, France, Germany and Canada combined: countries that
lost many more men in the 1914-18 bloodfest. Today, the military and
venal militarism are virtually off-limits for real public criticism.
Why?
Australia, a nation without enemies, is now spending $28billion a
year on the military and war and armaments in order to fulfill a
tragic, entirely colonial and obsequious role, now as Washington’s
“deputy sheriff” in the Asia-Pacific.
This much we know, perhaps have always known. But watching a contemporary version of crude Edwardian jingoism consume the nation’s intellect and self respect has been salutary, especially the cover provided by those paid ostensibly to keep the record straight. Tony Abbott, zealot, oaf and one of our cruelest prime ministers, “shone” at the Gallipoli Anzac service, according to Peter Fitzsimons, whose keyboard tomes on the subject shows no sign of abating. In the Murdoch press — augmented as ever to promote war after war — Paul Kelly echoes Abbott that remembrance is not enough; that the Anzac death cult “is now the essence of being Australian” …. indeed, “a quasi religious force”.
Young
Scott McIntyre drove the Twitter equivalent of a five-ton truck
through such maudlin, cynical drivel. He tweeted the unsayable about
imperial Australia, much of it the truth; and all decent journalists
— or dare I say, his freedom-loving compatriots – should be
standing up for him. That Malcolm Turnbull, a pretender for prime
minister who made his name unctuously shouting about freedom of
speech, should connive with McIntyre’s employer, the state-funded
TV network, SBS, (which has sacked him), is a measure of the state of
public and media life in Australia.
That
a journalism professor of long standing, John Henningham, can tweet
weasel words that “freedom of speech meant that journalists had the
right to speak without breaking the law but did not have the right to
keep their job when offending others” is a glimpse of the obstacles
faced by aspiring young journalists as they navigate the university
mills.
Many
young people reject this, of course, and maintain their sense of the
bogus, and McIntyre is one of them. He offended in the highest
tradition of freedom of thought and speech. Knowing the personal
consequences would be serious, he displayed moral courage. When his
union, the MEAA, locates its spine and its responsibility, it must
demand he is given his job back. I salute him.
Source: johnpilger.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.