Australia, which is arguably reliant on China for its very existence plays its part in the build-up of Sino-western tension in the South China Sea
Australian Media Spies Imaginary Weapons in South China Sea
Australian Media Spies Imaginary Weapons in South China Sea
As tensions
continue to rise in the South China Sea, Australian media outlets are
reporting that China has installed weapons on its artificial islands.
This despite citing no evidence, and despite the fact that Beijing
has consistently stressed that the islands will be used for peaceful
purposes.
27
May, 2015
On
Tuesday, Japan announced that it would join in the Talisman Sabre,
joint military exercises typically conducted by the United States and
Australia. The newly formed trifecta of Pacific allies was largely
seen as the latest in an attempt to bolster defenses against an
alleged Chinese threat.
While
Japan’s participation in the drills demonstrated Tokyo’s concern
over the Beijing’s construction of islands in the South China Sea,
Australia seems to have taken even more of Washington’s bait. A
number of Australian media outlets are now reporting that China has
moved weaponry onto artificial islands in the South China Sea.
While
these claims, if true, would represent a major shift in Chinese
policy, and a major escalation in the ever-growing tensions between
regional stakeholders, the outlets have not provided any evidence.
Many
of these reports could stem from the Australian government’s
growing concerns about their own trade routes, as Washington
continues to stoke fires about their imagined Chinese threat. While
Australia had previously remained neutral in all South China Sea
disputes, it appears to be changing its tune.
"Give
the size and modernization of China’s military, the use by China of
land reclamation for military purposes would be of particular
concern," Australia’s top defense official, Dennis Richardson,
said during a forum in Sydney.
The
Chinese government has repeatedly insisted that the islands lie
within its sovereign territory, and that it has every right to build.
On Tuesday, Defence Ministry Spokesman Yang Yujun compared the land
reclamation efforts to the construction of roads and homes on the
mainland.
"From
the perspective of sovereignty, there is absolutely no difference,"
he told reporters. This echoed earlier statements made by Foreign
Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying, who emphasized that the islands
would help maritime search and rescue, disaster relief, environmental
protection, and navigational security.
"Some
external countries are also busy meddling in South China Sea
affairs," a Chinese policy document, released on Tuesday, reads.
"A tiny few maintain constant close-in air and sea surveillance
and reconnaissance against China."
This
was taken as reference to the efforts of the United States. Despite
the fact that the US has no territorial claims in the region, it has
consistently heightened efforts to incite unrest in the sea, staging
military exercises with the Philippines and Indonesia, and launching
patrol missions over the land reclamation projects.
"China’s
actions are bringing countries in the region together in new ways,"
US Defense Secretary Ash Carter said during a military ceremony on
Wednesday. "They’re increasing demand for American engagement
in the Asia-Pacific. We’re going to meet it."
"We
will remain the principal security power in the Asia-Pacific for
decades to come," he added.
With
nearly $5 trillion in trade passing through its waters annually, the
South China Sea is a hotly contested region. While China lays claim
to most of the area, there overlapping claims from Vietnam, Taiwan,
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, and the Philippines.
From the Sydney Morning Herald
China moves weapons on to artificial islands in South China Sea
Reclamation: A satellite image taken in April shows a Chinese airstrip under construction on Fiery Cross Reef in the South China Sea. Photo: Reuters
SMH,
28 May, 2015
EXCLUSIVE
China has moved weaponry onto artificial islands that it is building in contested areas of the South China Sea, adding to the risks of a confrontation with the United States and its regional security partners including Australia.
Australian officials are concerned that China could also introduce long-range radar, anti-aircraft guns and regular surveillance flights that will enable it to project military power across a maritime expanse which include some of Australia's busiest trading lanes.
Fairfax understands that these concerns are prompting discussions in senior military circles that could lead to Australian naval officers and air force pilots embarking on "freedom of navigation" missions to demonstrate that Canberra does not accept Beijing's hardening claims.
The options, which include fly-throughs, sail-throughs and exercises involving various regional partners, are expected to crystallise after officials deliver a personal briefing to Prime Minister Tony Abbott during the next fortnight.
"It
is legitimate to ask the purpose of the land reclamation – tourism
appears unlikely," said Mr Richardson, delivering the annual
Blamey Oration at the New South Wales state Parliament.
"Given
the size and modernisation of China's military, the use by China of
land reclamation for military purposes would be of particular
concern," he said.
The
Defence Secretary's comments were the most detailed and forthright
from a senior Australian official since China began building its
audacious network of airstrips, deep-water ports and other
military-capable infrastructure on previously submerged reefs in the
Spratly Islands last year.
China
says the new sand islands will be used for humanitarian,
environmental, fishing and other internationally-minded purposes.
But
it warned this week in its own Defence White Paper that it would
gradually expand "offshore waters defence" to include "open
seas protection", adding that it would not tolerate other
countries "meddling".
In
Canberra, Fairfax understands that China's frenetic building activity
has prompted the Defence Intelligence Organisation and Office of
National Assessments to adopt a more hawkish tone since they each
delivered major strategic threat assessments to the National Security
Committee of Committee (NSC) mid-last year.
Their
revised strategic assessments, due to be submitted to the NSC in
coming weeks, will show how the reclamations could enable China to
greatly amplify threats of coercive force in order to play a
gate-keeping role across hotly-contested maritime areas, if left
unchecked.
What
Australia should do about the challenge is a more difficult question.
Australian
military officers and officials have discussed a need to demonstrate
that they do not recognise any 12-mile territorial zone or more
expansive economic zone that China may unilaterally claim around its
freshly-minted islands. But they are grappling with the need to avoid
inflaming a potential confrontation Australia's largest trading
partner.
Last
week the United States demonstrated its position with a flyover by a
P-8 surveillance plane, which carried a CNN journalist.
The
voice of an Australian can be heard over the aircraft's radio.
Senior
officers and officials have speculated that Australia could join a
humanitarian or military exercise with the United States or one of
several regional partners including Japan, Malaysia and Singapore.
Such
a move has been discussed in Washington and key capitals in the
region but no proposal has yet been put to Canberra, it is
understood.
It
could also dispatch naval vessels or air force planes through a
contested area on route to a routine destination.
Officials
say that any such "demonstration" is likely to be conducted
with minimal publicity, to avoid inflaming China's reaction.
Mr
Richardson, in his Sydney address to the Royal United Services
Institute, said the area of previously-submerged atolls that China
has reclaimed in the past year is nearly four times as large as that
which the five other claimant states have achieved over several
decades.
And
he critiqued the nebulous nature of China's claims which, on some
readings, cover more than 80 per cent of the entire South China Sea.
"It
is not constructive to give the appearance of seeking to change facts
on the ground without any clarification of actual claims," he
said.
"It
is legitimate to raise such questions and express such concerns
because tensions and potential miscalculations are not in anyone's
interest."
Going
back a few years now (in fact right back to Crossing the Rubicon),
Mike Ruppert foresaw that there would be tension (and war) in the
area we are seeing it today – in the South China Sea.
See below.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.