Embarking
On The Journey Of Consciousness: Staying On The Train
13
January, 2014
The
traveler has to knock at every alien door to come to his own, and one
has to wander through all the outer worlds to reach the innermost
shrine at the end.
~Rabindranath
Tagore~
Nearly
every day I speak with people who are confused, bewildered,
disoriented, or conversely, extraordinarily clear about what is
happening to them. A few years, months, or weeks earlier, they began
waking up to the predicament of earth and its plethora of species. I
often ask them to tell me their story—not so much their personal
story, but the story of their awakening to the collapse of industrial
civilization or peak oil or catastrophic climate change. As they
unpack their story, we often begin speaking of it as a journey—a
journey of epiphany, of awakening, of coming to consciousness.
What
I invariably recognize in my own journey of awakening and theirs is
that once any human being allows certain realities to penetrate a few
layers of denial, they have embarked on a journey from which there is
no return. The unconscious mind in concert with the denial
mechanisms, some of which are innate and some of which we have been
inculcated with, tend to work overtime to ensure that specific
realities will be almost immediately excluded from our awareness.
Nevertheless, as hard as the defense mechanisms may exert themselves,
occasionally, and for the most part for reasons we cannot yet
ascertain, some disturbing facts take root in the brain and nervous
system. This triggers certain bodily and emotional responses whereby
one has the choice to ignore, rationalize, minimize, or unequivocally
reject the facts, or on the other hand, ask more questions, delve
deeper, and risk receiving even more disturbing information.
People
often ask me: Why is that some people wake up, and others don’t? I
can’t answer that question. What I do know with certainty, however,
is that once one has allowed certain facts to implant themselves in
consciousness, there is no turning back. Often, without consciously
realizing it, we “sign up” for a journey from which there is no
return and which will alter everything in our lives, including and
especially, ourselves.
For
example, let’s say that a hypothetical guy named Gus somewhere
around the year 2002 hears about peak oil. His interest in energy and
technology engenders a certain fascination with the topic. He
continues to research the concept, and eventually he realizes that
peak oil necessarily means the end of industrial civilization, the
dissolution of all institutions and centralized systems on earth, and
eventually, the death of a significant number of human beings.
Perhaps Gus is deeply disturbed for many weeks or months, consumes
more than the usual amount of alcohol, and yet, he cannot extricate
himself from researching the topic. Perhaps he’s convinced himself
that if he just knows more and more and more and researches the topic
until he cannot read another word, somehow, his intellectual
understanding of the topic will provide him with some advantage over
the other poor bastards who don’t know what he’s finding out. But
with every new piece of information, Gus has to choose whether or not
to continue researching the topic or go back to sleep.
After
many months or years of research, Gus begins preparing himself and
his family for the eventualities of peak oil. You know the drill:
food and water storage, solar panels on the house, reskilling,
permaculture courses, weapons training, first responder training, and
everything else that usually follows the typical “End of Suburbia”
moment.
And
then a few years later, Gus hears about climate change. It’s bad.
He knows this. But peak oil is really bad, and now he’s hearing
about climate change, and he’s also hearing people talk about a
global economic crash—and worse, he’s hearing some people connect
all three of these terrible realities and refer to them as the “Three
E’s.” Gus thinks to himself: Damn, peak oil is enough to deal
with, but now I have to worry about climate change and economic
meltdown.
Again,
Gus has a choice. Theoretically, he could go home and announce to his
wife and kids that all this stuff about peak oil was wrong and
apologize for being so extreme and just go back to the trance of his
ordinary life. But something happened to Gus on the way to the
fiftieth peak oil website. He learned more than he is now capable of
denying. One of the choices Gus has is to end his life, but more is
at stake here than his own peace of mind. He adores his wife and
kids, and so he chooses to go on.
The
climate change thing is getting far worse, and now it’s beginning
to look like it’s driving the train, so to speak. It’s the
engine, economic collapse is the freight car, and maybe peak oil is
now the caboose. So now he begins researching climate change like
there’s no tomorrow (again, so to speak), and his mind is flooded
with numbers like 350 parts per million and 4 degrees centigrade and
words like self-reinforcing feedback loops. He’s really worried
about the future of his kids and all of life on earth. At this point,
Gus would really like to return to just thinking and talking about
peak oil, but he can’t because deep in the pit of his stomach, he
knows that climate change is happening much faster than the
consequences of peak oil. And in fact, even if he just focused on
peak oil, he’s watched that movie “Gasland,”
and he now realizes that peak oil, fracking, and climate catastrophe
travel together.
Then
one day, Gus hears a presentation by Guy
McPherson,
and he’s reeling. There’s nothing that can numb what he’s
feeling. But wait. Maybe McPherson’s research isn’t quite
accurate. Maybe all this stuff about near-term extinction and the
planet becoming mostly uninhabitable by 2030 is just bad science. So
Gus spends another ten hours online and compares McPherson’s facts
with those of another one hundred people. A little extreme, he thinks
to himself about the McPherson data, but it’s now 2012, and he’s
reading all those disastrous extreme weather reports in mainstream
news. Oh my God, he thinks, this climate change stuff is really
happening fast. The planet is heating up more rapidly than anyone
could have imagined.
Right
here, Gus has another choice to make. He can keep arguing about the
science, which he has every right to do, or he can do something else.
He can admit to himself that he’s profoundly scared. But then he
was profoundly scared when he first heard about peak oil and when he
first learned about global economic collapse. Yet he didn’t go back
to sleep. Fortunately, Gus can discuss these issues with his wife,
and he’s also found a Transition group where he can talk about some
of this stuff. He’s on Facebook every day, and there’s a
Near-Term Extinction support group there, and he’s networking with
those folks like there’s no tomorrow (so to speak).
Well,
as if all of this weren’t bad enough, it’s been over a year since
the Fukushima disaster, and the Internet is now flooded with
conflicting reports about what happened there, how much radiation was
blasted all over the planet, and what the long-term effects for life
on earth might be. Another choice-point. Damn, Gus thinks to
himself—peak oil, economic collapse, catastrophic climate change,
near-term extinction, and now Fukushima. At this point, Gus stops
thinking just about the future of his children and starts thinking
about his own future as well. Then it hits him like a ton of bricks:
I’m going to die. Yes, my children won’t have a future, but
perhaps I don’t either. At the age of forty-something, he’s in
the midst of an existential crisis.
Gus
finally has the worst of all realizations. He’s a huge fan of
bringing down industrial civilization as quickly as possible because
of what it’s doing to the planet and all species, but now he
realizes that if civilization were to collapse, in a short time, over
400 nuclear power plants around the world would begin to melt down
because they require an electrical grid in order to operate. Another
“Oh my God!” moment. Now Gus realizes that humanity is between
the most dire rock and hard place it’s ever experienced. Bring down
civilization, and the planet gets thoroughly radiated. Don’t bring
down civilization, and catastrophic climate change kills the planet
anyway.
It’s
as if back in 2002 Gus reluctantly boarded a train somewhere in
Pleasantville. The name of the station where the train originated was
“Peak Oil.” The next stop was “Climate Change.” Gus could
have gotten off there and returned to Pleasantville, but he chose to
stay on the train. Next stop: “Global Economic Collapse.” Again,
a choice to dis-embark. He didn’t. Now the tracks to and from all
three stations are connected. But somewhere in the maze of those
tracks, he encounters another station, “Catastrophic Climate
Change,” where Gus does not get off but rides on to the next
station, “Near-Term Extinction.” Staying on the train at this
point was almost unbearable, but after all the miles and miles of
track, after all the time, resources, and emotional energy invested,
how could he just get off the train? Thinking that “Near-Term
Extinction” was the very worst destination imaginable, Gus learns
that the next station is “Fukushima,” and now he knows he can’t
even think of getting off the train because Fukushima isn’t a
destination. It’s a place one passes through on the way to the end
of the line where the tracks end, and all life forms dis-embark.
I
suspect that if you are reading these words, you can identify with
the previous story because you are on a similar journey. Perhaps you
have not framed your experience in terms of a journey, but for me,
the image is useful. It is a journey characterized by a number of
distinct features.
1)
When confronting a new piece of information about our planetary
predicament, each of us chooses whether to ingest and assimilate the
information or not. If we are kind to ourselves, we ingest a bit of
it, allow it to distill, and then acquire more when we feel ready.
Furthermore, genuine kindness to ourselves also means that we pay
attention to the emotions that are stirred—fear, anger, grief,
despair, and more. Rather than attempting to flee from uncomfortable
feelings by engaging in intellectual debates about the accuracy of
the information with which we are confronted, we notice our emotions
even as we engage in deliberation.
2)
Early on, our journey appears to be nothing more than a project of
gathering information. As we progress, we may experience it as our
principal survival tool. As with the hypothetical Gus, we tell
ourselves that because “knowledge is power,” the more we know,
the more can protect ourselves and our loved ones.
3)
At some point in the journey, we move beyond simply gathering
information, and rather than our owning the journey, it begins to own
us. Invariably, whether we consent or not, we enter territory that I
can only describe as “spiritual.” In writing about spiritual
journeys, my friend and colleague, Terry
Chapman
defines it as “the ongoing, transformative, experience of
intentional, conscious engagement with what the sojourner perceives
as the presence of divinity.” Another word for divinity might be
“the sacred,” or “something greater or even “existential”
—issues having to do with meaning and purpose. Typically, people on
such a journey choose to arrange their lives not so much around
survival as around service. The core issue of one’s life becomes
not, how long can I stay alive, but how can I contribute to the earth
community? One becomes infused with compassion and gratitude. No day,
no being, no experience is ordinary, but rather, imbued with meaning.
4)
Whether we acknowledge it early or late in the journey, we
eventually grasp that what we are ultimately confronting is our
own death. The sooner we can honestly confront our mortality,
allowing ourselves to actually feel it in the body, the easier it
becomes to ingest and assimilate more distressing information. For
example, when I have led some people in a “die before you die”
exercise, they have often told me that once they sat with their own
death and how it might actually feel, they felt more capacity to face
not only near-term extinction but a variety of losses and
catastrophes.
Any
journey of consciousness eventually, in one way or other, compels us
to confront two very different aspects of ourselves, namely the ego
and the deeper self. We need both in order to function in a body on
this planet. During the first half of life the ego drives us to
acquire knowledge, forge a career, establish significant
relationships, and hone our skills. We make our way and our mark in
the world through the ego and its machinations. Then at some juncture
during midlife, the human psyche begins to expand beyond ego pursuits
and gratifications. We enter a time of reflection in which we are
quite naturally drawn to ponder not merely the contents of our
earlier life, but more specifically, the person who lived it.
To
those who argue that there is no meaning or purpose for our human
experience, I would first of all say: I’m sorry for your loss. I
would then wonder about the age of the person making the statement.
“Life is meaningless” is a first-half-of-life declaration. Yet
even if one makes the statement in the second half of life, I must
ask: If life is devoid of meaning, why have humans for billions of
years attempted to make meaning of their experiences? I do not know
if other species attempt to find meaning in their experience, but I
can’t imagine telling Beethoven or Van Gogh or Shakespeare that
life is meaningless.
Throughout
human history our species has used both art and ritual to make
meaning. Not surprising since the literal definition of ritual is “to
fit together.” Art serves a similar purpose in that it gathers the
fragments of sound, color, texture, light, shadow, movement, and
poetic verse to heal what is broken within us or simply offer new
opportunities to recognize our wholeness. When we make either art or
ritual, we are acknowledging that making meaning is possible and that
it matters to our soul and the soul of the other.
Someone
has said that the difference between a Greek comedy and a Greek
tragedy is that when the play ends, the protagonist in the comedy
knows who he is, whereas the protagonist in the tragedy does not.
Indeed this is the difference between a life committed to
meaninglessness and one committed to making meaning.
Waking
up to anything—collapse, near-term extinction, the aftermath of
Fukushima necessarily involves suffering. However, before the reader
infers more from this word than is intended, let me emphasize that
whatever form, texture, or degree of severity suffering takes, it can
most fundamentally be defined as the loss of control. Moreover, I
believe that this is the most terrifying aspect of making the choice
to stay on the train and not dis-embark until the end of the line
because loss of control and the end of the line are inextricably
connected. For the industrially civilized psyche, loss of control
feels like death because it is the death of the ego. And in fact, our
consummate duty in the journey of consciousness is to intentionally
assist the ego in breathing its last breath on a daily basis.
Obviously, we need the ego in order to function in a body on this
planet, but in this culture, the ego has been forced to ingest a
regimen of steroids since birth.
Becoming
conscious means that we flush the steroids and have a serious
conversation with the ego about its proper place in the psyche. If we
are committed to waking up, it will feel as if the ego is (and we
are) dying many times throughout the day. However, in this constant
conflagration between the ego and the deeper self, we have an
advantage in the form of another aspect of the psyche that we might
call the “neutral witness.” It is the part of us that can stand
outside the ego and simply observe its incessant flailing. The
neutral witness doesn’t have to do anything but simply observe the
entire drama. The more time we spend in neutral witness, the easier
(never easy) it becomes to allow the ego to find or flail into its
proper place.
As
we continue our ticklish and tricky dance with the ego, we are likely
to experience more compassion, more generosity, more open-hearted
receptivity, more spontaneity, more harmonious human relationships,
more intimacy with the earth and the more-than-human world, and more
passion in our resistance to the civilized death machine.
Additionally, we are likely to become more aware of and sensitive to
what Paul Levy describes
as Malignant Egophrenia or the “ME Disease” of our culture. With
time and commitment to the practice, that is, the practice of staying
on the train and abiding in the neutral witness position, it may
become possible to begin each day by asking, “What needs to die in
me today, and how can I assist the process?”
Eventually,
death becomes not a symbolic surrender but a literal necessity, and
the question of what needs to die in me today becomes a declaration
that today is a good day to die. For this is indeed is the
culmination of all spiritual teaching and the destiny toward which
every being is headed from the moment of birth.
Perhaps
you’ve noticed that staying on the train is a full-time job and
that in doing so, there is little chance of maintaining business as
usual. Sometimes the speed of the train feels painfully slow, as if
one is riding on the little engine that could. At other times, one
feels hurled through time and space on a bullet train. In either
situation, whether consciously or unconsciously, all passengers on
this train have signed up for a spiritual, as well as historical,
intellectual, and physical journey, and it is no longer possible to
live ordinary lives in extraordinary times.
You
may have boarded the train believing that you were on a journey
through literal time and space, encountering the dissolution of the
external landscape. In fact, when you boarded the train, you embarked
on a journey in quite the opposite direction which Rumi describes
brilliantly:
You
lack a foot to travel?
Then journey into yourself
And like a mine
of rubies
receive the sunbeam’s print
Out
of yourself such a journey
will lead you to your self,
It leads
to transformation
of dust into pure gold!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.