Is
Australia Going to Kill the Great Barrier Reef on Friday?
Image via
29
January, 2014
The
largest reef network in the world may be half dead, but Queensland,
Australia needs jobs and Asia needs coal—and coal jobs trump
everything. We’ll be reminded of this again on Friday, when the
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority decide whether it’s
appropriate to dump about 106 million cubic feet of dredged sand on
the reef. This is part of a master plan to turn a smallish coal port
named Abbot Point into the world’s largest, enabling it to single
handedly process half of Queensland’s current coal output, which is
also projected
to be a third larger by 2030. With 64.6
percent (194.5 million tons) of Australia’s coal shipped out of
Queensland in 2012, upping the state’s export capabilities is a
priority, even though a bunch of mega-ports sit right next to the
Great Barrier Reef. So do we dredge carefully, or do we dredge like
we mean it?
Abbot
Point is currently one of the smaller ports, about 15 miles north of
Bowen and the most northerly in the state. It’s one of several
lined up for expansion, but it was the first approved for dredging by
Australian Environment Minister Greg Hunt, back in December. There
were a few ideas for disposing of the dredge spoil, including pumping
it back to land, before it was decided that dropping it in the deep
water amongst the reef was the way to go/cheap. Allegedly the sand
will settle within 7-10 days and the coral won’t be affected, but
the locals are up in arms, and according to Felicity Wishart from the
Australian Marine Conservation Society, it's for good reason.
“The
problem is that the fine sediment forms a cloud which can then be
carried long distances, and recent modeling by the marine park showed
it travels much farther than previously thought. This then reduces
the light, which is critical to coral survival. What we’re saying
now is that we already have a reef that’s struggling, we just don’t
need the added stress of dredging.”
In
the eyes of business, the same conundrum can be said of the
Queensland economy. According to the Chairman for the Bowen Business
chamber, Bruce Hedditch, “regional centers need job opportunities.
If we don’t support something like Abbott Point,” he reasons,
“our future is in a cloud. It’s just like a tree. If the tree
doesn’t grow, it dies. There hasn’t been any information put
forward that says it’s been an absolute disaster somewhere else.
That to me, means that the Great Barrier Reef and the area around
Bowen will be protected.”
The
problem is that there have been problems elsewhere, as Gladstone
Harbour brought to light in 2011. After an alleged
cost cutting exercise, a retaining wall leaked potentially acid
sulphate soil into the harbour, clouding the water and causing a ban
on fishing that lasted weeks. When pointed to this, Bruce countered
that there’d be no such retaining wall at Abbot Point and that, “In
any situation something
could happen, but if you adopt that attitude nothing will ever be
done. And right now every effort is being made to make sure that it
doesn’t.”
According
to Felicity, the issue there is more about permitting the start of a
more worrying trend. “We’ve seen a lot of focus on Gladstone
Harbour,” she explains, “but the fact that it’s only one of
several proposals which add up to 40 million cubic meters of dumped
sand in the reef’s waters. So really it’s about saying we saw the
damage caused at Gladstone and now we’ve got more damage planned
for Abbot Point, including a whole lot of other proposals at Bathurst
Bay and Mackay. So it’s a combination of all this stuff we’re
worried about.”
Flaming
the dispute is the irrefutable evidence that the reef needs help. An
Australian
Institute of Marine Science report released in 2012 revealed that
50 percent of reef cover has disappeared since 1988, a scary
revelation primarily attributed to fertilizer run-off and outbreaks
of the Crown of Thorns star fish. Ironically, these stresses are
coupled with coral bleaching, which occurs when sea water becomes
even slightly warmer than the average high. As the world chugs toward
a changed climate these temperatures become only more common, while
shipping coal to power stations in Korea, Japan, and India only
exacerbates the problem.
In
the end it all comes down to a gamble. Economic return is definite,
whereas environmental damage is only possible. Get more money, or
don’t. And according to Hedditch, the choice is simple. “If we
put our heads in the sand and cross Abbott Point out, we lose all
these jobs. Don’t think it won’t go somewhere else. If these
companies want coal they’ll go to other countries and buy it if
Australia’s shooting itself in the foot. In India there are 400
million people without electricity. What right do we have to sit back
and say no, you can’t have our coal?”
Follow
Julian on Twitter: @MorgansJulian
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.