Chemical
spill in W Virginia
Comments
from Mike Ruppert, Facebook
Local
officials described MCHM as smelling like licorice and looking like
“cooking oil floating on top of the water.” The West Virginia
Department of Health and Human Resources said symptoms of MCHM
exposure include “severe burning in throat, severe eye irritation,
non-stop vomiting, trouble breathing or severe skin irritation such
as skin blistering.”
"Once
contaminated, the water cannot be treated."
We
are receiving credible reports from the region that the National
Guard is out, that there has been looting and that the water supplies
for nine counties have been trashed.
The
6 Most Terrifying Facts About the Chemical Spill Contaminating West
Virginia’s Drinking Water
No
one knows when water will be safe to drink again.
11
January, 2014
On
Thursday, an
estimated 300,000 residents of
nine counties in West Virginia were told they could not use or drink
their tap water after a chemical used to wash coal of impurities
spilled from a holding tank into the Elk River. The spill prompted
Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin to declare a state of emergency, and 9-1-1
received more
than 1,000 calls in
the hours after a spill, with four
or five people transported
to the hospital by ambulance. According to the National
Library of Medicine,
repeated or prolonged exposure to the chemical, 4-Methylcyclohexane
Methanol, can “cause headaches, irritation of the eyes, nose, and
throat, and can also cause a skin rash.”
On
Friday, West Virginia American Water Co. held a press conference to
share what they knew so far about the spill. Unfortunately, they
still don’t know much about the spill or the chemical involved.
1.
No one knows when water will be safe to drink again. “I
can’t ballpark it because I don’t know,” Jeff McIntyre,
president of West Virginia American Water Co. said at the conference.
The entire water system will have to be flushed and tested, and
though the Elk River was the water source immediately impacted by the
spill, McIntyre said that the spill impacts the entire distribution
of the water system — sending water to a total of 1,500 miles in
the area.
Charleston
Mayor Danny Jones said that he had hoped to find out a timeline for
when residents could use their tap water again at the press
conference.
“This
has been devastating to the public at large and the people that live
in our city,” he said. “The folks out there that just work every
day and go to work and who are just regular citizens, they would like
an end to this.”
2.
No one knows when the leak started or how much has leaked into the
Elk River. It
was complaints of an odor coming from communities near the river that
triggered city and county officials to investigate. They found the
source of the spill at 4 p.m. Thursday, but had no way of knowing how
long the chemical had been leaking. McIntyre also said he didn’t
think the chemical was still leaking, but didn’t know the current
status of the spill for sure. According to a Department
of Environmental Protection spokesman,
the state is “confident that no more than 5,000 gallons escaped,”
but only knows that “a certain amount of that got into the river.
Some of that was contained.”
3.
The water company has had no contact with Freedom Industries, the
company that manufactures the spilled chemical. According
to McIntyre, the company provided no notice of the spill and hasn’t
been in communication with the water company since.
4.
There is no standard process for testing the toxicity of the spilled
chemical in water. When
the water company found out about the spill, it was originally told
it was a different chemical than the 4-Methylcyclohexane Methanol
that had spilled into the water. But even when the company found out
what the chemical was, it couldn’t answer many questions about it.
“This not a chemical that’s typical to be in water treatment
process,” McIntyre said during the press conference.
5.
It’s unclear just how dangerous the diluted chemical is to drink or
breathe.According
to McIntyre, toxicologists have said that people would have to eat a
large amount of the chemical to cause harm, but still, McIntyre said
he didn’t know how the chemical had affected the safety of the
water. “We don’t know that the water’s not safe, but I can’t
say it is safe.” However, Kanawha County Deputy Emergency Services
Director C.W. Sigman said during the press conference that the
chemical is hazardous, which lines up with the National Library of
Medicine information on the chemical.
6.
The chemical may have leached into the soil. McIntyre
said that when the containment in the chemical holding tank failed,
the chemical traveled over land and into the Elk River. That could
have caused some leaching, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.