Saudi
Arabia warns of shift away from US over Syria, Iran
DOHA/WASHINGTON
- Upset at President Barack Obama's policies on Iran and Syria,
members of Saudi Arabia's ruling family are threatening a rift with
the United States that could take the alliance between Washington and
the kingdom to its lowest point in years
22
October, 2013
Saudi
Arabia's intelligence chief is vowing that the kingdom will make a
"major shift" in relations with the United States to
protest perceived American inaction over Syria's civil war as well as
recent US overtures to Iran, a source close to Saudi policy said on
Tuesday.
Prince
Bandar bin Sultan told European diplomats that the United States had
failed to act effectively against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or
in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was growing closer to Tehran,
and had failed to back Saudi support for Bahrain when it crushed an
anti-government revolt in 2011, the source said.
"The
shift away from the US is a major one," the source said. "Saudi
doesn't want to find itself any longer in a situation where it is
dependent."
It
was not immediately clear whether the reported statements by Prince
Bandar, who was the Saudi ambassador to Washington for 22 years, had
the full backing of King Abdullah.
The
growing breach between the United States and Saudi Arabia was also on
display in Washington, where another senior Saudi prince criticized
Obama's Middle East policies, accusing him of "dithering"
on Syria and Israeli-Palestinian peace.
In
unusually blunt public remarks, Prince Turki al-Faisal called Obama's
policies in Syria "lamentable" and ridiculed a US-Russian
deal to eliminate Assad's chemical weapons. He suggested it was a
ruse to let Obama avoid military action in Syria.
"The
current charade of international control over Bashar's chemical
arsenal would be funny if it were not so blatantly perfidious. And
designed not only to give Mr. Obama an opportunity to back down (from
military strikes), but also to help Assad to butcher his people,"
said Prince Turki, a member of the Saudi royal family and former
director of Saudi intelligence.
The
United States and Saudi Arabia have been allies since the kingdom was
declared in 1932, giving Riyadh a powerful military protector and
Washington secure oil supplies.
The
Saudi criticism came days after the 40th anniversary of the October
1973 Arab oil embargo imposed to punish the West for supporting
Israel in the Yom Kippur war.
That
was one of the low points in US-Saudi ties, which were also badly
shaken by the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Most of
the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals.
Saudi
Arabia gave a clear sign of its displeasure over Obama's foreign
policy last week when it rejected a coveted two-year term on the UN
Security Council in a display of anger over the failure of the
international community to end the war in Syria and act on other
Middle East issues.
Prince
Turki indicated that Saudi Arabia will not reverse that decision,
which he said was a result of the Security Council's failure to stop
Assad and implement its own decision on the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict.
"There
is nothing whimsical about the decision to forgo membership of the
Security Council. It is based on the ineffectual experience of that
body," he said in a speech to the Washington-based National
Council on US-Arab Relations.
'Friends
and allies'
In
London, US Secretary of State John Kerry said he discussed Riyadh's
concerns when he met Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal in Paris on
Monday.
Kerry
said he told the Saudi minister no deal with Iran was better than a
bad deal. "I have great confidence that the United States and
Saudi Arabia will continue to be the close and important friends and
allies that we have been," Kerry told reporters.
State
Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said Riyadh had not conveyed to the
State Department its intention to reduce its cooperation with the
United States. She said the issue was also not raised in the meeting
between Kerry and the Saudi minister.
"Not
to my knowledge has that message been sent to the State Department by
the Saudis," Harf told a daily briefing. "We talked about
some of the challenging issues that we want to confront together."
she said.
Prince
Bandar is seen as a foreign policy hawk, especially on Iran. The
Sunni Muslim kingdom's rivalry with Shi'ite Iran, an ally of Syria,
has amplified sectarian tensions across the Middle East.
A
son of the late defense minister and crown prince, Prince Sultan, and
a protege of the late King Fahd, he fell from favor with King
Abdullah after clashing on foreign policy in 2005.
But
he was called in from the cold last year with a mandate to bring down
Assad, diplomats in the Gulf say. Over the past year, he has led
Saudi efforts to bring arms and other aid to Syrian rebels.
"Prince
Bandar told diplomats that he plans to limit interaction with the
US," said the source close to Saudi policy.
"This
happens after the US failed to take any effective action on Syria and
Palestine. Relations with the US have been deteriorating for a while,
as Saudi feels that the US is growing closer with Iran and the US
also failed to support Saudi during the Bahrain uprising," the
source said.
The
source declined to provide more details of Bandar's talks with the
diplomats, which took place in the past few days.
But
he suggested that the planned change in ties between the energy
superpower and the United States would have wide-ranging
consequences, including on arms purchases and oil sales.
Saudi
Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, ploughs much of its
earnings back into US assets. Most of the Saudi central bank's net
foreign assets of $690 billion are thought to be denominated in
dollars, much of them in US Treasury bonds.
"All
options are on the table now, and for sure there will be some
impact," the Saudi source said.
He
said there would be no further coordination with the United States
over the war in Syria, where the Saudis have armed and financed rebel
groups fighting Assad.
The
kingdom has informed the United States of its actions in Syria, and
diplomats say it has respected US requests not to supply the groups
with advanced weaponry that the West fears could fall into the hands
of al Qaeda-aligned groups.
Saudi
anger boiled over after Washington refrained from military strikes in
response to a poison gas attack inDamascus in August when Assad
agreed to give up his chemical weapons arsenal.
'A
big mistake'
Representative
Chris Van Hollen, a member of the US House of Representatives'
Democratic leadership, told Reuters' Washington Summit on Tuesday
that the Saudi moves were intended to pressure Obama to take action
in Syria.
"We
know their game. They're trying to send a signal that we should all
get involved militarily in Syria, and I think that would be a big
mistake to get in the middle of the Syrian civil war," Van
Hollen said.
"And
the Saudis should start by stopping their funding of the al
Qaeda-related groups in Syria. In addition to the fact that it's a
country that doesn't allow women to drive," said Van Hollen, who
is close to Obama on domestic issues in Congress but is less
influential on foreign policy.
Saudi
Arabia is concerned about signs of a tentative reconciliation between
Washington and Tehran, something Riyadh fears may lead to a "grand
bargain" on the Iranian nuclear program that would leave Riyadh
at a disadvantage.
Prince
Turki expressed doubt that Obama would succeed in what he called an
"open arms approach" to Iran, which he accused of meddling
in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq and Bahrain.
"We
Saudis observe President Obama's efforts in this regard. The road
ahead is arduous," he said. "Whether (Iranian President
Hassan) Rouhani will succeed in steering Iran toward sensible
policies is already contested in Iran. The forces of darkness in Qom
and Tehran are well entrenched."
The
UN Security Council has been paralyzed over the 31-month-old Syria
conflict, with permanent members Russia and China repeatedly blocking
measures to condemn Assad.
Saudi
Arabia backs Assad's mostly Sunni rebel foes. The Syrian leader,
whose Alawite sect is derived from Shi'ite Islam, has support from
Iran and the armed Lebanese Shi'ite movement Hezbollah. The Syrian
leader denounces the insurgents as al Qaeda-linked groups backed by
Sunni-ruled states.
In
Bahrain, home of the US Fifth Fleet, a simmering pro-democracy revolt
by its Shi'ite majority has prompted calls by some in Washington for
US ships to be based elsewhere.
Many
US economic interests in Saudi Arabia involve government contracts in
defense, other security sectors, health care, education, information
technology and construction
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.