Ecuador's
Correa: Obama's exceptionalism talk reminiscent of Nazi rhetoric
before WWII
US
exceptionalism rhetoric poses extreme danger and is reminiscent of
Nazi ideals and talk “before and during World War II,” Ecuadorian
President Rafael Correa said in exclusive interview with RT Spanish
RT,
4
October, 2013
Referring
to US President Barack Obama’s statement that “America
is exceptional”
because it stands up not only for its own “narrow
self interest, but for the interests of all,"
Correa said: “Does not this
remind you of the Nazis’ rhetoric before and during World War II?
They considered themselves the chosen race, the superior race, etc.
Such words and ideas pose extreme danger,”
President Correa said on RT Spanish’ Entrevista program.
As for cases of espionage in Latin America and the subsequent criticism from regional leaders, Obama said the US will try to respect the sovereignty of those countries “in cases where it will be possible.”
At the recent UN General Assembly, Brazil launched a blistering attack on US espionage, saying it “is a breach of international law.” President Correa said the US will keep violating other countries’ sovereignty, but this will eventually change.
“What Plato wrote in his [Socratic] dialogues more than 2,000 years ago is true. Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. They are strong, that’s why they will continue lying, violating other states’ sovereignty, and breaching international law. But one day this unjust world will have to change,” Correa said.
As for cases of espionage in Latin America and the subsequent criticism from regional leaders, Obama said the US will try to respect the sovereignty of those countries “in cases where it will be possible.”
At the recent UN General Assembly, Brazil launched a blistering attack on US espionage, saying it “is a breach of international law.” President Correa said the US will keep violating other countries’ sovereignty, but this will eventually change.
“What Plato wrote in his [Socratic] dialogues more than 2,000 years ago is true. Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. They are strong, that’s why they will continue lying, violating other states’ sovereignty, and breaching international law. But one day this unjust world will have to change,” Correa said.
When
asked about whether the UN headquarters should be moved out of the
US, Correa replied “definitely
yes.”
But, he pointed out that there are other things that carry more
importance.
For example, the headquarters of the American Convention on Human Rights is located in Washington, yet “the US did not ratify the Pact of San Jose, that is, the American Convention on Human Rights…but the headquarters of the organization is in the US and they finance their activities,” Correa said. “This is outrageous and an example of a relationship the US established with developing countries in the form of subordination.”
For example, the headquarters of the American Convention on Human Rights is located in Washington, yet “the US did not ratify the Pact of San Jose, that is, the American Convention on Human Rights…but the headquarters of the organization is in the US and they finance their activities,” Correa said. “This is outrageous and an example of a relationship the US established with developing countries in the form of subordination.”
'US
will not be able to hide the truth about Chevron’s oil disaster’
While
responding to questions about Chevron-Texaco’s oil damages in
Ecuador, Correa said that the US would not be able to hide the truth
- despite having money, power, and hundreds of lawyers by its side.
“Chevron has caused
irreparable damage to the Ecuadorian jungle,”
the president said. “Texaco
did nothing to clear the area…At the time, there were cleaner
technologies available, but they wanted to save a few bucks, and they
destroyed the environment and did not even bother pay for the
damages.”
Correa
pointed out that the scale of the disaster in Ecuador is 85 times
higher than the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and 18 times
higher than the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska. “But
they decided that if it happened in the Amazon region of Ecuador,
then there is nothing to worry about.”
The
case against Chevron-Texaco has been ongoing for two decades, and
stems from the oil company’s operations in the Amazon, which date
back to the period between 1972 and 1990.
In
February 2011, a judgment by a provincial court in Ecuador produced a
multi-billion dollar award against Chevron. However, as the company
currently has no holdings in Ecuador, the plaintiffs have instead
attempted to force payment in Canada, Brazil, and Argentina.
The
$19 billion verdict was the result of a 1993 lawsuit filed in New
York federal court by a group of American attorneys – including
Steven Donziger - on behalf of 88 residents of the Amazon rainforest.
In the intervening period, Texaco was acquired by Chevron in 2001,
and plaintiffs re-filed their case in Ecuador in 2003.
For
its part, Chevron insists that it was absolved of responsibility for
the environmental damages by a 1995 cleanup agreement. The oil
company places responsibility for the damages on Petroecuador,
Ecuador’s national oil company.
At
the end of September, Ecuador’s foreign ministry announced that the
US had seemingly denied visas to a delegation that was set to travel
to the UN General Assembly in New York to present their case
regarding an ongoing dispute against Chevron-Texaco.
According
to the ministry’s official announcement, visas for the five
Ecuadorian nationals were returned by the US Embassy in Quito
“without any explanation.”
The
group was to present testimony during a special event at the UN
regarding the ecological impact caused by Chevron-Texaco’s oil
operations in the Amazon rainforest region of Ecuador, which
contaminated two million hectares, according to the country’s
government.
However see this - Amazon Oil Drilling Project Approved By Ecuador's Parliament
Ecuador's parliament on Thursday authorized drilling of the nation's largest oil fields in part of the Amazon rainforest after the failure of President Rafael Correa's plan to have rich nations pay to avoid its exploitation.
3
October, 2013
The
socialist leader launched the initiative in 2007 to protect the
Yasuni jungle area, which boasts some of the planet's most diverse
wildlife, but scrapped it after attracting only a small fraction of
the $3.6 billion sought.
The
government-dominated National Assembly authorized drilling in blocks
43 and 31, but attached conditions to minimize the impact on both the
environment and local tribes.
Though
Correa says the estimated $22 billion earnings potential will be used
to combat poverty in the South American nation, there have been
protests from indigenous groups and green campaigners.
About
680,000 people have signed a petition calling for a referendum.
"We
want them to respect our territory," Alicia Cauilla, a
representative of the Waorani people who live around the Yasuni area,
said in an appeal to the assembly.
"Let
us live how we want."
Correa
has played down the potential impact of oil drilling in the area,
saying it would affect only 0.01 percent of the entire Yasuni basin.
A
U.S.-trained economist, Correa has won broad popular support among
Ecuador's low-income majority with heavy spending on welfare, health,
education and infrastructure projects.
He
says it is essential for the country to expand its oil reserves in
order to direct more state spending toward the poor.
Oil
output in OPEC's smallest member has stagnated since 2010 when the
government asked oil investors to sign less-profitable service
contracts or leave the country. Since then, oil companies have not
invested in exploration.
State
oil company Petroamazonas will be in charge of extraction in blocks
43 and 31, which are estimated to hold 800 million barrels of crude
and projected to yield 225,000 barrels per day eventually. Ecuador
currently produces 540,000 bpd.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.