Why
Russian doomsday climate predictions may prove prophetic
By
Olga Dobrovidova
RTCC,
25
March, 2013
Climate
change was back in the spotlight for the Russian media last week,
with doomsday-style predictions of more extreme weather events,
rapidly warming Arctic and growing global average temperatures.
The
scary headlines literally say stuff like Arctic
temperatures might rise by up to 7 degrees by 2100 compared to 2.8
degrees globally,Climate
change means more extreme weather events and Average
temperatures in Russia growing twice as fast as globally –
things mentioned in WWF Russia’s “Answering the Climate
Sceptic’s 100 Questions” handbook.
While
some of those stories are invariably generic, others boast
frightening numbers, albeit without all that boring stuff like
scenarios, confidence levels and uncertainty, or even where the data
was taken from.
The
secret is not in the sauce but in the source.
If
you decide to find out which ministry is responsible for climate
change issues in Russia by googling “climate change ministry” in
the appropriate language, the results might be surprising, scary,
misleading and thought-provoking at the same time.
How’s
that, you ask? Well, because the ministry that’s most publicly
active and articulate about the dangers of climate change is Emercom,
the Ministry of Emergency Situations.
If
that’s not impressive enough, it’s officially known as the
Ministry for Affairs for Civil Defence, Emergencies and
Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters.
Wow,
right? Emergencies. Civil Defence.
Are
we talking about a department of the Russian government – the same
government that’s known for its procedural interventions, Kyoto
opt-out and ‘The Great Concerns over Growing Level of Legal
Nihilism?’?
Yes,
we are, and here’s why.
The
vigilant ministry constantly keeps track of what it considers threats
to the country’s wellbeing – and possible sources of more work
for them.
It
has an analytical centre designed specifically to monitor and assess
these threats, and this center casually starts every year with a
forecast.
Then,
you just have to connect the two remaining dots. One, Russia is a
truly HUGE country stuck between desertification in the south,
thawing permafrost in the north, water quality issues in the west and
hurricanes in the east.
Two,
the grimmer our future looks, the more money Emercom can ask for.
And
that can be a hell of a lot of money considering that same forecasts
estimate yearly losses and damages from various emergencies,
including those that can be linked to climate change, at up to 2%
GDP, or 900 billion roubles (around $30 bln).
Talk
about good deeds for various reasons.
And
yet, according to WWF Russia’s Alexey Kokorin, this time the
ministry that can occasionally beat Greenpeace at alarmism, was
“unfortunately, not really pessimistic in its forecasts”.
Kokorin
notes that most of the scenarios Emercom cites are rather moderate,
and overall the ministry managed to get its facts right –
background facts, that is.
Nevertheless,
that cloud of non-news has a silver lining after all. The level of
general environmental awareness and interest in climate change
matters in Russia is incredibly low – we are talking “no one
cares” low.
Thus,
anyone willing to sell the 101-level basics as news and having the
means to get mainstream media to report on that is in fact doing the
world a great service.
Because,
simply put, for quite a lot of Russians, this is indeed breaking
news.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.