Another
hit for Christchurch
People
have been trying to get access to this information for a long time –
now all the details have been leaked to the public.
EQC
leak much larger than realised
The
Earthquake Commission has revealed that the privacy breach last week
was more than eight times larger than originally announced -
affecting every claimant in the Canterbury home repair programme.
25
March, 2013
This
afternoon, EQC chief executive Ian Simpson said the data in the
spreadsheet, emailed to a third party outside the organisation, could
be manipulated to reveal the details of 98,000 claims from all 83,000
claimants.
Originally,
information from only 9700 people was said to be at risk in the
breach, which happened on Friday morning.
Simpson
said when the breach was announced to the media last week, it was not
apparent the information on the other 73,000 claimants could be
accessed using the spreadsheet's pivot table tool.
The
spreadsheet contained claim numbers and home addresses, but not names
of those in the programme for homes requiring repairs costing between
$15,000 and $100,000, he said.
Are
you affected by this breach? Email reporters@press.co.nz
The
scale of the breach meant EQC would not be contacting each claimant
to inform them, but would be taking out advertisements in the
Christchurch newspapers.
Simpson
said the outside party had since destroyed the email, though four
other people had been in the room when it was received.
The
breach occurred when a staff member sent out an email intended for
EQC staff, and the auto-complete function in the email program
accidentally filled in the address of a third party, an EQC
contractor.
An
independent review of the breach would be commissioned.
In
addition, security processes for encrypting and accessing sensitive
data, as well as the rules for using email to send sensitive
documents, would be reviewed, he said.
He
apologised for the breach, saying the matter was "embarrassing
and disappointing".
Simpson
would not name the recipient of the email, but said the person had
"acted in good faith".
Privacy
breach 'ironic'
Christchurch
Mayor Bob Parker said the situation was ''rather ironic''.
''People
would love to what the contents of their EQC files, in many cases
they can't get to them, but meanwhile one person has received
information relating to thousands and thousands of claims.''
Parker
said leaks like this ''just could not afford to happen'' and said
technological systems nationwide needed to be improved.
''This
will just put our community under further pressure and will create
more uncertainty,'' Parker said.
Christchurch
City councillor Glenn Livingstone said somebody should "take the
fall" for the breach.
''Whether
that's the minister or the CEO [of EQC] ... but it is a CEO's job to
keep the minister informed and by the sounds of it, that hasn't
happened.''
He
said the scandal would ''confirm people's low confidence levels in
EQC''.
Dalziel
and Brownlee exchange words
Labour's
earthquake recovery spokeswoman Lianne Dalziel said the breach was of
a scale "unprecedented in New Zealand'' and called on Earthquake
Minister Gerry Brownlee to take full responsibility.
"EQC
has tried to deny that the figure is seven times worse than admitted.
The truth is no one at EQC or the minister's office checked the email
thoroughly enough to realise the data was sitting behind the figures
on a different sheet than the one they relied on for the 9700 figure.
"That
is gross incompetence and a political scandal," said Dalziel.
"I
also know that people other than the mistaken recipient saw this
information before they alerted him that the email had been sent to
him in error and he agreed to delete the information. One of those
people contacted me over the weekend."
Dalziel
said it was "time for the Minister to take full ministerial
responsibility".
She
called on Brownlee to explain when he first knew of the extent of the
breach and to disclose the extent of the details attached to each of
the leaked home addresses.
"He
must also undertake to ensure that EQC will provide each person
affected with a simple status report on their claim so they know
where they stand."
Meanwhile,
Brownlee said he was very disappointed to learn at "2:21pm
today" that the EQC privacy breach contained information
relating to more claimants than EQC first thought.
He
said he took ''great issue'' with Dalziel's claim that he should have
checked the email and spreadsheet to ''identify that hidden data was
embedded within the material''.
''Information
held by EQC does not routinely make its way to the Minister's
office,'' he said.
Brownlee
said EQC had improved its procedures for ''encrypting and surely
accessing sensitive data'' and an independent review would also take
place.
He
had advised EQC to take ''whatever legal action they deem
appropriate'' to ensure the information had not been copied or
distributed.
UPDATE:
EQC
boss offered to step down after breach
26
March, 2013
Earthquake
Commission chief executive Ian Simpson offered his resignation to
Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee during a meeting on a
privacy breach.
The
EQC has had to apologise twice for accidentally emailing information
about 83,000 Canterbury earthquake claimants to someone outside the
organisation.
Mr
Simpson said the minister told him at a Beehive meeting on Tuesday
that he should focus on the job at hand and make sure any problems or
errors are not repeated.
The
chief executive said they discussed further steps the commission
could take to avoid a repetition of the breach, and a technical
review will cover how the original error occurred and what measures
can be taken to prevent a recurrence.
Mr
Brownlee told reporters he had confidence in Mr Simpson. "He
understood that it had caused embarrassment to the Government and
said that if he was a casualty of that, he certainly understood that.
I said, look, we've got a problem that we've got to get over."
Labour
Party leader David Shearer says the Government is treating the issue
too lightly. "There needs to be a process in place by which this
cannot happen and the Government has not put out any sort of
safeguards to enable that process to occur."
An
Excel spreadsheet containing claim details of clients in EQC's
Canterbury Home Repair programme accidentally sent by a staff member
to the wrong email address contained information regarding building
quotes, estimated settlement costs and details of cash settlements.
Earlier
on Tuesday Mr Simpson told Radio New Zealand's Morning Report
programme that corrections had been made to email systems to make
sure this would not happen again. Changes included not sending out
spreadsheets as email attachments.
Files
contained 'many details'
The
information was mistakenly sent to Bryan Staples, chief executive of
insurance advocacy company Earthquake Services, last week.
Mr
Staples said the attachment was full of details Cantabrians have been
asking the EQC to provide for over two years, including estimated
settlement costs and the number of cash settlements the commission is
expecting to make.
"I
saw that over 60,000 of those claims were categorised under $50,000.
This is absolutely outrageous - it's political. EQC fixing
Christchurch is all about the next election. They're going to try and
cash settle claims for under $50,000. They need to come clean."
The
attachment contained EQC estimates of repair costs but Mr Brownlee
said that cannot be given to claimants themselves because it is
commercially sensitive.
"Obviously
we want tradespeople who are doing that work to compete for the
work," he said. "If you say right up front what you expect
to pay you'll end up paying more, and that would come out of the
pockets of taxpayers."
Mr
Staples has deleted the email and and promised the information would
not be distributed any further.
He
said the EQC staff member who sent the file was someone he is in
regular contact with and he told her about it within half an hour of
receiving the email.
Mr
Staples is adamant it was not him who passed information to Ms
Dalziel and said he was disgusted politicians had turned turned a
simple human error into a political football.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.