Iran,
the Straits of Hormuz , Israel and Nuclear War
Are
the United States and Israel Entrapping Iran to Close the Strait of
Hormuz?
6
May, 2019
Submitted by Richard Galustian…
The
central question when reading this piece is would Iran’s closure of
the Strait of Hormuz precipitate a nuclear attack by the U.S., no
doubt in conjunction with Israel, and equally no doubt, coordinated
by the Trump Neocons that are controlled by DC based AIPAC …and
Israel?
The
Strait of Hormuz is probably the most strategically important sea way
‘chokepoint’ in the world.
Nearly
20 million barrels of oil pass through the small gap at the mouth of
the Persian Gulf, in parts as narrow as 30 miles in places; and I
mean 20 million barrels every day,24/7, 365 days a year.
For
those that do not comprehend the magnitude of the above number, it
must be understood that the total world oil production (an
average recently established for the first five months of 2019) is
just over 80,000,000 barrels per day.
So
put another way, She (Iran) controls ‘the chokepoint’ through
which one fifth of all the world’s oil production daily passes.
If
Iran closes, that ‘chokepoint’ in Her sea, the effect on the oil
price and the world’s economy will be devastating; and Iran can do
it; don’t believe the propaganda from the Pentagon and their
American (and British) government(s) nor their ‘puppet’ media.
Iran can do it in a heartbeat.
The
Strait of Hormuz separates the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean
which is why Oman is so very strategically important. The subject of
a separate article!
Over
the past 40 years the Strait has been a area of acute sensitivity.
The largest conflict so far in the Strait was named by its
instigator, America, Operation Praying Mantis, in April 1988.
At
the beginning of the Iran-Iraq War (started September 1980 and ending
July ‘88) Iran positioned several mines in order to cut off oil
shipments, if necessary, from all the countries of the Gulf and of
cause from Iraq. It was in fact the catalyst that caused the
formation of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
As
stated earlier, in 1988, because a U.S. Naval warship hit one of
these mines while it was escorting oil tankers, America’s response
was to launch on the 18th April 1988 a fairly massive Military
counter offensive under its designated name, Operation Praying
Mantis. This operation attacked Iranian military and oil
infrastructure in and around the mouth of the Strait and ventured
into the Persian Gulf proper.
(A
very relevant note that also needs a separate article is to mention
the totally unprovoked attack by the USS Vincennes on an Iran Air
civilian aircraft, killing all passengers, a war crime for sure, on
the 3rd July 1988 …and that events connection with the PANAM
Lockerbie disaster which occurred on the 21st December 1988; as I
said, the subject of another to be written article).
When
it was over, the U.S. had sunk or severely damaged over half of the
Iranian Navy.
Both
the U.S. and Iran continue to complain of each other’s Navy
harassing the others in the Persian Gulf, a sea that irrefutable
belongs to Iran.
This
is what has led to Iran recently, not for the first time, threaten to
close the Strait which would cut off a fifth of the world’s oil
supply.
Just
the very threat of shutting down the Strait to oil tankers has an
immediate affect on the global oil price. If Iran ever did act on
these threats the cost of oil would probably quickly rise to close to
a $100 a barrel, disastrously affecting the world economy.
Ever
since the U.S. Operation Praying Mantis, the Iranian military has
focused its development of a force with the ability to take control
of the Strait. They know that they cannot possibly match the
firepower of the U.S. Navy. So over the past few decades they have
turned to asymmetrical warfare.
Iran
has two separate navies; the Navy and the Revolutionary Guards Navy.
Between
the two, Iran operates nearly two thousand boats. Most of these are
smaller fast Swedish made vessels which would be used in ‘swarm
attacks’ against larger U.S. naval ship formations. Although the
boats are mostly lightly armed with 20mm calibre guns, the plan would
be to simply to overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers. That
plan has, in essence, remained the same since the 1980s.
In
terms of larger ships, Iran operates six British made frigates and
three Corvettes. Each armed with over 40 anti-ship missiles; they
have about three dozen actual ‘missile boats’. These are armed
with Russian and Chinese made weapons.
The
Iranians also operates about 30 submarines, about two thirds of which
are midget submarines.
The
most capable of their submarine force are the three Russian Kilo
class subs. The Kilos are quicker, quieter and more heavily armed.
Iran
also operate several mine laying craft that are stationed near the
Strait and could be deployed very quickly. The Iranian coastline near
the Strait is littered with a very large number, in the hundreds, of
anti-aircraft guns from Switzerland (35mm), Sweden (40mm) and Russia
(23mm) as well as surface to air and surface to surface (Silkworm)
missile sites all positioned in nearby naval ports and air bases.
Most of these are located in and around Bandar Abbas and Qeshm island
with other sites spread across various much smaller islands near the
mouth of the Straits, in the Persian Gulf.
The
islands that used to belong to Abu Dhabi have them; those islands
were ‘gifted’ to the Shah of Iran by the British Labour
government of the day (in 1971) when Britain granted independence to
all the little countries on the other side of the Gulf. To this day,
the UAE claims ownership with a degree of legitimacy.
As
for Iran’s Air Force, the majority of their aircraft are older and
consists of an estimated 25 operational U.S. F14 fighters, supplied
during the Shah’s time in 1977, and even older U.S. F4s and F5s,
the total number bring estimated at over 120. There are some newer
fighters namely some twenty five or so MIG29s, some French Mirage F1s
and some Chinese F7s (which are copy’s of the MiG 21). Plus a range
of COIN turboprop aircraft from Switzerland, Brazil and home produced
estimated (each with 3 pods under each wing to carry armaments) at
over a 100 in number.
Iran’s
accomplished defense industries has also designed their own version
of the S300. It still remains to be seen how effective that system
is. They also have a number of older SAM versions and even a U.S.
Hawk battery system supplied, it is thought along with Harpoon
missiles courtesy of Ronald Reagan’s administration under the terms
of the still fairly secret Iran-Conta deal.
As
for the U.S., given that this imagined scenario is of Iran closing
the Strait of Hormuz, unexpectedly the U.S. would only have whatever
assets are in the region at that time to react with which is the U.S.
5th Fleet who are ‘sitting ducks’ in their location in
Bahrain. The Americans say otherwise but that is BS.
US 5th fleet docked in Bahrain – Courtesy Press TV
The
U.S. does maintain at least one carrier strike group in the region
that has been involved in the fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. A
carrier strike group typically consists of a carrier and four or five
cruisers and or destroyers and a carrier air wing consisting of 40 to
48 F18 multi role fighters.
These
U.S. ‘battle groups’ are confidently said to be invulnerable but
that is propaganda from the Pentagon – a coordinated asymmetric
attack by Iran could take out a carrier group.
It
is assumed that there are at least a few US submarines and possibly a
couple of converted Ohio class subs armed with over one hundred and
fifty Tomahawk cruise missiles.
As
for air bases the U.S. currently has aircraft in Bahrain, in
Qatar, in the UAE, in Djibouti and in Diego Garcia in the Indian
Ocean. Aircraft operate at these bases have the full spectrum and
variety that you would expect from the USAF, including of course
AWACS, drones of every description and B52, B1, B2 bombers and
several stealth fighters.
All
that said, if Iran close the Strait, it will be no easy task for
America to reopen it. The U.S. would have to clear mines and
eliminate Iranian naval vessels and anti-aircraft and ship missile
batteries. Easy to say but not to do!
Despite
being half a world away the US still operates a larger number of even
more advanced aircraft and drones in the region. The U.S. would need
to quickly degrade Iran’s air power involving even dogfights and
attacks by cruise missiles on air bases.
The
U.S. no doubt has come up with enhanced and effective countermeasures
to ward off Iran’s Military but as with all counter measures, they
do not work 100 percent. The nature of such beasts so to speak. If
however the U.S. could significantly eliminate Iran’s Air Force and
anti-aircraft batteries then the U.S. might make it possible to
destroy Iran’s naval fleet.This would still prove to be a difficult
task. The U.S. simultaneously would also have to conduct large scale
anti submarine warfare missions to deal with the Iranian submarine
threat. This again would prove very difficult due to the relatively
large Iranian submarine fleet and missing even one sub could result
in very heavy strategic losses.
Much
of this scenario would rely on the location of the huge U.S. carrier
strike group(s). If it was in the Persian Gulf during the closure of
the Strait, the U.S. could potentially face several major humiliating
losses, even losing a carrier at the hands of dozens and dozens of
small boats, aircraft and anti ship missiles.
Swarms
of fast attack craft (mostly around 15 metres in length), would
attack, as stated earlier, in an asymmetric manner with aircraft.
However
if the U.S. carrier grouping were out in the Gulf of Oman or in the
northern Indian Ocean, the U.S. could keep its distance, minimizing
its risk, while it surgically strikes at Iranian targets using
probably cruise missiles.
To
conclude the reopening the Strait of Hormuz, should it be closed,
would be a very difficult task and could take several days maybe
weeks.
Never
forget all such military actions have larger consequences. The main
one being the escalation into a much bigger war with Iran which
no doubt the Israelis would enter; and remember the Israelis have
nukes, and hundreds of them.
Over
one billion dollars worth of oil passes through the Strait every day
most of which goes to Asian countries like China Japan and India. And
the oil is a vital source of income for the small Gulf countries not
forgetting Saudi Arabia and Iraq. All will not want a clash
between Iran and the U.S. there.
The
closure of the Straits would quite simply be intolerable for all
these countries.
The
last word on this subject I leave to Iran’s top military commander
Major General Mohammad Bageri who said recently:
“As
oil and commodities of other countries are passing through the Strait
of Hormuz, ours are also moving through it,” Bageri observed,
declaring that “if our crude is not to pass through the Strait of
Hormuz, others’ (crude) will not pass either.” Bageri went on to
explain that “this does not mean (that we are going to) close the
Strait of Hormuz. We do not intend to shut it unless the enemies’
hostile acts will leave us with no other option. We will be fully
capable of closing it on that day.”
And
the solution is?: Wisdom must be found in Washington to realise that
the best way to defeat an enemy is to make him a friend.
Unfortunately given the dominance of Neocon Zionists in Washington,
one doubts we can expect to find wisdom amongst the like of Bolton
and Pompeo, quite the contrary.
So
in concluding, and particularly for those who think my conclusion
that there exists an unbreakable military and political axis between
U.S. and Israel to specifically provoke and destroy Iran…(and of
course other countries as well, most especially Syria, but let’s
stay with Iran) …and in order to further preempt any accusation
about me personally, that I am being biased towards Iran, I end with
this interesting 20 minutes discussion, that make a few very key and
pertinent points on the subject, which was recorded in America on
22nd April and is available on YouTube:
The
only hope the world has to prevent a nuclear Armageddon in this
and/or other global flash-points is the total removal of the Neocons
in Washington and the election of a pro-peace candidate as President
in 2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.