I noticed RT video footage of this, but paid scant attention
Tracking the Footprints of the Arctic Methane Monster: Black Craters in the Siberian Tundra, Methane Lacing 2,500 Mile Wide Smoke Plumes Over Gigantic Arctic Wildfires.
Tracking the Footprints of the Arctic Methane Monster: Black Craters in the Siberian Tundra, Methane Lacing 2,500 Mile Wide Smoke Plumes Over Gigantic Arctic Wildfires.
18 July 2014(Are massive fires spurred by human-caused warming tapping basement methane pockets within the Arctic Tundra? Massive smoke plume from unprecedented Siberian wildfires expands to blanket more than 2,500 miles of Russian Siberia and Arctic Ocean shores. METOP sensors show high levels of methane ranging from 2,000 to 2,200 parts per billion or 150 to 350 ppb above the global average, at 18,000 feet within the smokey overburden. Image source: LANCE-MODIS.)
Is
the Arctic Methane Monster climate science’s version of he who must
not be named?
For
apparently, Arctic Methane, in all its various permutations, has
become the gas that mainstream media and climate media now no longer
mentions.
NASA’s
CARVE study has been silent for a year, the University of Maryland
has stopped putting out publicly available AIRS methane data
measures, the NOAA ESRL methane flask measures, possibly due to lack
of funding, haven’t updated since mid-May, and even Gavin Schmidt
over at NASA GISS appears to have become somewhat mum on a subject
that, of late, has generated so much uncomfortable controversy.
Despite
this fading out of the topic and related publicly available data,
likely due to an overall discomfort with the potential nasty
implications of an expanding Arctic methane release combined with
efforts by conservative political forces to de-fund observational
climate science, large Arctic carbon and related methane stores
remain vulnerable to the various forces set in motion by human-caused
warming. In essence, it’s a problem that won’t go away no matter
how much you ignore it.
The
subsea permafrost, methane clathrates locked in mud and sediment on
and beneath the sea bed, methane generated from wet, thawing tundra,
and methane locked in pockets far beneath the boreal forests and
tundra all remain in stores of untold gigatons and gigatons. A
massive volume that represents an extraordinary potential amplifying
feedback to the unprecedentedly rapid human-caused warming of Arctic
lands and oceans risking a very dangerous release.
Did
Explosive Methane Release Gouge a Black Crater in Siberian Tundra?
This
week, Arctic methane cognitive dissonance reached a new extreme as
the discovery of a large, 100-foot-wide hole in a section of tundra
along Siberia’s Yamal Peninsula set mainstream media abuzz. The new
discovery fueled speculation that a large pocket of thawing
subsurface methane may have undergone explosive release. The
resultant explosion is thought to have violently ejected soil and
scorched the crater leaving a black hole in the tundra:
Other
potential culprits include a meteor impact or tundra collapse due to
subsurface ice melt. But the ejecta signature appears to be one of a
crater that underwent a violent explosion and Russian scientists seem
certain that a meteor was not involved. Anna Kurchatova of the
Sub-Arctic Scientific Research Centre believes
the most likely suspects are the explosion of thawing methane due to
a volatile mixture of water, methane and salt triggering an eruption
or the building up of pressure due to the venting and expansion of
the thawed gas causing the overlying land feature to be violently
ejected like a champagne cork.
The
large sub-surface methane stores are certainly there and we’ve
known for some time that risks of explosive out-gassing of this
material, due to human caused warming and thaw of frozen methane
stores, was possible given a chemical or thermal release and ignition
mechanism. If the Yamal (which unhappily translates to mean ‘end of
the world’) crater is the result of a violent explosion of thawing
methane and ejection of the overlying earth strata, it will have
implications not only for tundra permafrost thaw but for sea-bed
permafrost thaw and ocean methane clathrate thaw as well.
So
the question remains — how many more explosions ripping apartment
building-sized or larger holes in the Earth are we in for if thawing
and exploding methane was, indeed, the culprit of this, admittedly
odd and disturbing, event? And what impact will this have on an
atmosphere already well overburdened with human greenhouse gasses?
Methane
Spikes in Smoke above Siberian and Canadian Tundra Fires
Meanwhile,
investigation of 18,000 foot methane readings reveals high levels of
methane gas lacing the large clouds of smoke spreading from massive
wildfires over Canada and especially Siberia. NOAA’s
METOP sensor
shows atmospheric methane in the smoke/cloud layer at and above
18,000 feet ranging in excess of 2,000 parts per billion over
sections of Canada and North America as well as over a broad swath
covering Central and Northeastern Siberia. Highest atmospheric
methane readings at this altitude were in smoke clouds over Siberia
at levels near 2,200 parts per billion.
For
reference, the current atmospheric average is around 1860 parts per
billion at the surface.
(High
atmospheric methane readings coincident with large smoke plumes from
tundra fires over Siberia and Canada. Data from METOP provided
by NOAA.)
Absent
other research provided by scientists, both the very large hole in
the tundra in Russia’s Yamal Peninsula (that some scientists are
saying was the result of a very large methane pocket erupting to the
surface) together with coincident measures of high methane readings
in smoke plumes over Arctic wildfires provide evidence of an ongoing
and hazardous Arctic methane release.
Though overall emissions rates
have, likely, not yet reached catastrophic levels, the potential for
moderate to catastrophically strong feedback from this very large and
volatile carbon store should be serious cause for concern and the
focus of concerted national and international investigation. Given
the risk, the current silence and apparent scientific withdrawal from
broader Arctic methane research is entirely inappropriate and
short-sighted.
Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.