On
track to 'go beyond the critical point': Sri Lanka still losing
forests at rapid clip
15
July, 2014
Human-elephant
conflicts on the rise, some conservation initiatives planned by
government
In
1983, Sri Lanka became embroiled in a 26-year-long civil war in which
a rebel militant organization fought to establish an independent
state called Tamil Eelam. The war took an enormous human toll;
unknown numbers disappeared and millions more were displaced.
Economic development stagnated in the rebel-held north and east of
the country, while foreign investment shied away from the country.
During
the latter half of the war, between 1990 and 2005, Sri Lanka suffered
one of the highest rates of deforestation in the world, losing about
35 percent of its old growth forest and almost 18 percent of its
total forest cover. However, some parts remain relatively unscathed.
"There
has been destruction of much forest and mangrove areas to provide
less cover for the antagonistic parties," Ranil Senanayake, an
ecologist and chairman of Rainforest Rescue International in Sri
Lanka, said in a previous interview with mongabay.com. "However,
many wetlands and other critical ecosystems in the 'war zone' have
been spared the pillaging that follows the 'economic development'
agents, who treat all land as a commodity to be exploited for instant
economic gain."
A legal resettlement near a forest in Sri Lanka. Photo by Manori Gunawardena.
The
conflict ended in 2009, and while deforestation has slowed somewhat,
Sri Lanka is still losing forest cover at a fast clip. Global Forest
Watch figures show 49,652 hectares were lost between 2009 and
2012.
Sri Lanka, a small island nation located off the
southern tip of India, has one of the highest biodiversity densities
in all of Asia, and is regarded as one of the world’s biodiversity
hotspots. Together with India’s Western Ghats, the region once had
nearly 200,000 square kilometers (77,000 square miles) of important
wildlife habitat, of which less than seven percent remains
intact today.
Because
of its isolation and tropical climate, Sri Lanka is home to many
unique species and subspecies found nowhere else, such as the
purple-faced langur (Trachypithecus vetulus) and the Sri Lankan
elephant (Elephas maximus maximus), both of which are listed as
Endangered by the IUCN.
Purple-faced langurs (Trachypithecus vetulus) are endemic to Sri Lanka. They are decreasing in number due to development of their habitat and are currently listed as Endanged by the IUCN. Photo by Jeroen84. |
People
displaced by the war returned to their old homes to find the jungle
and wildlife had taken over. When they cleared the land and started
to farm, elephants lost secondary forest habitat. In response, the
giant herbivores helped themselves to nutrient-rich cultivated crops,
leading to escalating conflicts between farmers and elephants.
“The government ought to have had a conservation plan overlapping with the resettlement plan,” wildlife biologist Manori Gunawardena told mongabay.com. “Much of the loss suffered by people and elephants could have been minimized.” Belatedly, the administration is now working on such a plan.
The families of returning refugees had also grown over the past three decades and they needed more land. The government has marked zones for settlement and is creating infrastructure such as roads and railways, leading to further deforestation. For instance, between Vavuniya and Trincomalee, the 48,451-hectare Padaviya Forest Reserve shows telltale signs of deforestation. In 2013, 12,900 hectares – more than a quarter of the reserve – were handed over to the Sri Lanka Mahaveli Authority for human resettlement.
In May 2014, environmentalists accused the government of illegally seizing almost 1,000 hectares from forested areas in the Northern Province for resettlement.
Sri Lanka has lost nearly 100,000 hectares in the last 14 years, representing nearly 1.5 percent of its land area. Courtesy of Global Forest Watch. Click to enlarge.
Additionally, individuals themselves have also cleared forests and created homesteads. Some of these are illegal, such as settlements in Wilpattu North Sanctuary.
In one case, the administration opened to the public a dirt road running through Wilpattu National Park in the country’s northwest. When challenged by environmentalists, officials claimed it was the Old Mannar Road that had been in use before the war. However, Environmental Foundation Limited (EFL) filed a case in 2011, providing evidence the Old Mannar Road was prevoiusly defunct and replaced by forest, with a new road created by the Sri Lankan military to facilitate movement of its forces during the war. While the road cannot be surfaced with asphalt until further judicial orders, people continue to use the road.
In the hilly center of the country, expansion of cardamom cultivation threatens the Knuckles Forest Reserve, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. In the south, forest clearance for growing tea endangers the Kanneliya Forest Reserve.
A resettlement farm recently cleared from the surrounding forest. Photo by Manori Gunawardena.
But of more immediate concern are the concessions granted to agricultural companies to grow bananas, soya, and corn near forests. Environmentalists threatened to sue Dole Food Company for clearing more than 200 hectares of Somawathie National Park to grow bananas, its biggest fruit crop. Although the company abandoned this plantation in November 2011, it has other holdings near the forests of Chunnakkadu, Lunugamvehera, and Buttala. The company was also accused of clearing 1,214 hectares of Lunugamvehera National Park.
Dole is just one of Sri Lanka’s many banana growers. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, more than 50,000 hectares – nearly one percent of Sri Lanak’s land area – were used for banana cultivation in 2000, a number that has likely only increased as the industry expanded from small-scale family farms to large, industrial plantations.
Energy projects are also taking a toll on Sri Lankan forests. Right on the edge of Ruhunu National Park (popularly called Yala), an area inhabited by several herd of elephants, United Dendro Energy Private Limited clear-felled 500 hectares of forest land without getting the necessary approvals. In this freshly cleared area, the company planted rows of Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) saplings. Once mature, the trees will be harvested and ground into wood chips to feed a supposedly sustainable energy project. Other dendro-power companies intercrop Gliricidia with rubber trees and rice on agricultural land.
Map showing clearing of forest for various developments, including Sri Lanka's international airport. Courtesy of Global Forest Watch. Click to enlarge.
Perhaps the most egregious case of deforestation involves the area near the Mattala International Airport, Hambantota. In 2006, the Department of Wildlife drove 250 elephants out of a 60,000-hectare forest slated for development. The animals were herded into the nearby Lunugamvehera National Park and their exit blocked by electric fences. However, the elephants had difficulty acclimating to the move, and many calves and adults died of starvation as they paced the fence looking for a way out instead of looking for food. Half of their once-forest home was replaced with irrigated banana fields, tsunami rehabilitation settlements, a flashy international conference center, and the new international airport.
In the other half, around 300 to 400 elephants remained. However, growing influxes of people led to mounting conflicts as the elephants became accustomed to human presence and lost their fear. Formerly shy, retiring animals were now quick to lose their temper with any farmers who had the temerity to chase them.
To see how the elephants were moving through their habitat, biologists Prithviraj Fernando and Jennifer Pastorini tracked two bulls and seven cow elephants using satellite transmitters. They found some ranged right up to the walls of the airport, and their data has been used to set up protected areas for the animals.
“We have identified important areas for elephants in the south," Fernando told mongabay.com. "This informs management and development decisions so detrimental effects on elephants can be minimized. Based on elephant tracking data, the government has recognized approximately 300 hectares as the first Managed Elephant Reserve outside protected areas.”
Additionally, Fernando and Pastorini advise local communities where to erect electric fences to guard settlements and crops from elephants.
Elephant movement around Hambantota, where the new airport was recently built. Each color represents an individual elephant, with each dot representing a location where it traveled. Courtesy of Jennifer Pastorini/Centre for Conservation and Research. Click to enlarge.
On June 19, 2014, the Minister for Environment and Renewable Energy, Susil Premajayantha, announced plans to increase the country’s forest cover to 35 percent by the year 2020. However, he did not mention whether this will be done though reforestation or plantation expansion.
“At this rate of deforestation, our forest cover will go beyond the critical point when it will affect everything,” Rukshan Jayawardene, a conservationist based in Colombo, told mongabay.com. “We can already see the changes in the wet zone [on the west coast of the country], which has little forest cover left.
“Forests are the common resources of this country and can never be replaced. The current developments will squander them in a few years.”
Present and proposed conservation areas in northern Sri Lanka. Click to enlarge.
“The government ought to have had a conservation plan overlapping with the resettlement plan,” wildlife biologist Manori Gunawardena told mongabay.com. “Much of the loss suffered by people and elephants could have been minimized.” Belatedly, the administration is now working on such a plan.
The families of returning refugees had also grown over the past three decades and they needed more land. The government has marked zones for settlement and is creating infrastructure such as roads and railways, leading to further deforestation. For instance, between Vavuniya and Trincomalee, the 48,451-hectare Padaviya Forest Reserve shows telltale signs of deforestation. In 2013, 12,900 hectares – more than a quarter of the reserve – were handed over to the Sri Lanka Mahaveli Authority for human resettlement.
In May 2014, environmentalists accused the government of illegally seizing almost 1,000 hectares from forested areas in the Northern Province for resettlement.
Sri Lanka has lost nearly 100,000 hectares in the last 14 years, representing nearly 1.5 percent of its land area. Courtesy of Global Forest Watch. Click to enlarge.
Additionally, individuals themselves have also cleared forests and created homesteads. Some of these are illegal, such as settlements in Wilpattu North Sanctuary.
In one case, the administration opened to the public a dirt road running through Wilpattu National Park in the country’s northwest. When challenged by environmentalists, officials claimed it was the Old Mannar Road that had been in use before the war. However, Environmental Foundation Limited (EFL) filed a case in 2011, providing evidence the Old Mannar Road was prevoiusly defunct and replaced by forest, with a new road created by the Sri Lankan military to facilitate movement of its forces during the war. While the road cannot be surfaced with asphalt until further judicial orders, people continue to use the road.
In the hilly center of the country, expansion of cardamom cultivation threatens the Knuckles Forest Reserve, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. In the south, forest clearance for growing tea endangers the Kanneliya Forest Reserve.
A resettlement farm recently cleared from the surrounding forest. Photo by Manori Gunawardena.
But of more immediate concern are the concessions granted to agricultural companies to grow bananas, soya, and corn near forests. Environmentalists threatened to sue Dole Food Company for clearing more than 200 hectares of Somawathie National Park to grow bananas, its biggest fruit crop. Although the company abandoned this plantation in November 2011, it has other holdings near the forests of Chunnakkadu, Lunugamvehera, and Buttala. The company was also accused of clearing 1,214 hectares of Lunugamvehera National Park.
Dole is just one of Sri Lanka’s many banana growers. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, more than 50,000 hectares – nearly one percent of Sri Lanak’s land area – were used for banana cultivation in 2000, a number that has likely only increased as the industry expanded from small-scale family farms to large, industrial plantations.
Energy projects are also taking a toll on Sri Lankan forests. Right on the edge of Ruhunu National Park (popularly called Yala), an area inhabited by several herd of elephants, United Dendro Energy Private Limited clear-felled 500 hectares of forest land without getting the necessary approvals. In this freshly cleared area, the company planted rows of Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) saplings. Once mature, the trees will be harvested and ground into wood chips to feed a supposedly sustainable energy project. Other dendro-power companies intercrop Gliricidia with rubber trees and rice on agricultural land.
Map showing clearing of forest for various developments, including Sri Lanka's international airport. Courtesy of Global Forest Watch. Click to enlarge.
Perhaps the most egregious case of deforestation involves the area near the Mattala International Airport, Hambantota. In 2006, the Department of Wildlife drove 250 elephants out of a 60,000-hectare forest slated for development. The animals were herded into the nearby Lunugamvehera National Park and their exit blocked by electric fences. However, the elephants had difficulty acclimating to the move, and many calves and adults died of starvation as they paced the fence looking for a way out instead of looking for food. Half of their once-forest home was replaced with irrigated banana fields, tsunami rehabilitation settlements, a flashy international conference center, and the new international airport.
In the other half, around 300 to 400 elephants remained. However, growing influxes of people led to mounting conflicts as the elephants became accustomed to human presence and lost their fear. Formerly shy, retiring animals were now quick to lose their temper with any farmers who had the temerity to chase them.
To see how the elephants were moving through their habitat, biologists Prithviraj Fernando and Jennifer Pastorini tracked two bulls and seven cow elephants using satellite transmitters. They found some ranged right up to the walls of the airport, and their data has been used to set up protected areas for the animals.
“We have identified important areas for elephants in the south," Fernando told mongabay.com. "This informs management and development decisions so detrimental effects on elephants can be minimized. Based on elephant tracking data, the government has recognized approximately 300 hectares as the first Managed Elephant Reserve outside protected areas.”
Additionally, Fernando and Pastorini advise local communities where to erect electric fences to guard settlements and crops from elephants.
Elephant movement around Hambantota, where the new airport was recently built. Each color represents an individual elephant, with each dot representing a location where it traveled. Courtesy of Jennifer Pastorini/Centre for Conservation and Research. Click to enlarge.
On June 19, 2014, the Minister for Environment and Renewable Energy, Susil Premajayantha, announced plans to increase the country’s forest cover to 35 percent by the year 2020. However, he did not mention whether this will be done though reforestation or plantation expansion.
“At this rate of deforestation, our forest cover will go beyond the critical point when it will affect everything,” Rukshan Jayawardene, a conservationist based in Colombo, told mongabay.com. “We can already see the changes in the wet zone [on the west coast of the country], which has little forest cover left.
“Forests are the common resources of this country and can never be replaced. The current developments will squander them in a few years.”
Present and proposed conservation areas in northern Sri Lanka. Click to enlarge.
Climate change will have
adverse impact on Sri Lanka
by Dulmin
Samarasinghe
6
April, 2014
Sri
Lanka's climate variability has increased. The night temperature in
Nuwara-Eliya has gone up and weather changes in Nuwara Eliya will not
be suitable for potato cultivation and even other types of
cultivations. The Deputy Director of the Centre for Climate Change
Studies, Meteorological Department (CCCSMD) Ms. Anusha Warnasooriya
gave a death knell warning that cultivation in these areas are
doomed. This will create social issues, as farmers have to find
alternative means of living.
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has issued a report
saying that the effects of climate change are already occurring in
all continents and across the oceans. The report says that the world,
is not prepared for risks from a changing climate and the risks will
be difficult to manage with high levels of global warming. Island
states such as Sri Lanka are vulnerable to climate change as those
are surrounded by sea. The sea level is predicted to rise due to
global warming. Sri Lanka experienced unusual heavy rains and longer
period of droughts last year. This type of weather patterns are
expected to continue in the future.
Ms.
Anusha Warnasooriya said that there was a difference between climate
and weather although people believed it to be the same. Climate is
the long time weather that has been prevailing in an area and at
least ten years of change of weather has to be observed to decide
whether the climate has changed. Ideally it should be at least 30
years, she said. The climate is a complex issue which depends on
factors such as sea, ice, atmosphere and life which includes humans,
animals, trees and buildings.
She
said that according to IPCC definition, climate change is the
"variability or average state of the atmosphere over time scales
ranging from decades to millions of years". The temperature of
the land and sea has increased but the heat capacity of the sea is
more. This makes the sea to expand and water level to rise. The heat
is felt more in the Northern hemisphere as there are more lands in
the region. The temperature has increased by 0.6 degrees Centigrade
from 1901 to 2005. But it has increased by 0.74 degrees Centigrade
from 1906 to 2005, indicating a rise in temperature during the recent
100 years.
|
Potato
cultivation in Nuwara Eliya, which is at its peak will decline
with climate change
|
|
Farmers
cultivates potatoes
|
Climate
change is not only the increase of temperature but decrease of it as
well, she said. The global temperature has decreased in 1940's where
it is attributed to the reduction of industrial activities due to
world wars. Again in 2010 some countries have experienced decline in
temperature while others have seen an increase. Some countries have
experienced more rainfall and others less during the period between
1961 and 1990. She said that more rainfall is expected in Asia in the
future.
The
rate of sea level rising has increased. It has increased by 1.7mm per
year from 1870 to 2010 and 3.28mm per year from 1993 to 2011. This
could cause problems to island states such as Sri Lanka as coastal
areas could be submerged.Ms. Warnasooriya said that the intensity of
cyclones, hurricanes, typhoons and their effects have become
intensified. Extreme weather conditions have been reported more
during 2001 and 2010, she said. The highest temperature has been
recorded in 2010.
Although
the climate change occurs due to natural phenomena such as the change
in the path taken by earth to move around the sun from an oval shape
to cycle, change of the side of the angle of earth when orbiting
around sun, a change in earth's 23.5 degrees, a continental drift,
scientists say this could not happen as it takes thousands and
thousands of years. Therefore human activities have contributed to
the climate change, scientists say.
Ms.
Warnasooriya said that human activities have altered the composition
of the atmosphere. They have released Carbon-Dioxide to the
atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. Humans have felled trees so that
Carbon-dioxide cannot be absorbed. Emission of green house gasses has
depleted the Ozone layer. Housing and building constructions, cutting
and replacing of trees have changed the landscape and sun rays
directly heat up the earth. The temperature on Mars is -50 degrees
Centigrade as it does not have green house gasses but the temperature
on Venus is +470 due to green house gasses there.
"The
number of deaths can be increased due to heat waves, people can get
heat strokes, insects, parasites and mosquitoes can be increased,
there can be more rains at the same time there can be more dry areas,
there will be more wild fires and intensity of lightening will be
increased", if the temperature rises, she said. Sea level has
risen due to thermal expansion and melting of ice in the poles. The
sea level is estimated rise by 88cm for 100 years.
Although
cyclones are known for their devastating effects, those are needed to
keep the energy balance in the world, she said. Cyclones help to cool
the atmosphere by taking winds across the seas and lands. Sea
currents do a similar task by carrying warm water from equator to
poles.
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is the international body
for assessing the science related to climate change. It was set up in
1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations
Environment Program to provide policy makers with regular assessments
of the scientific basis of climate change, its impacts and future
risks, and options for adaptation and mitigation. Sri Lanka is a
member of this international body.
The
report, titled Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and
Vulnerability, from Working Group II of the IPCC, details the impacts
of climate change to date, the future risks from a changing climate,
and the opportunities for effective action to reduce risks. Three
hundred and nine authors and review editors, drawn from 70 countries,
were selected to produce the report. They enlisted the help of 436
contributing authors, and 1,729 experts.
The
report has said that responding to climate change involves making
choices about risks in a changing world. The nature of the risks of
climate change is clear, though climate change will continue to
produce surprises. The report identifies vulnerable people,
industries, and ecosystems around the world. It finds that risk from
a changing climate comes from vulnerability and exposure overlapping
with hazards.
"We
live in an era of man-made climate change," said Vicente Barros,
Co-Chair of Working Group II. "In many cases, we are not
prepared for the climate related risks that we already face.
Investments in better preparation can pay dividends both for the
present and for the future."
Adaptation
to reduce the risks from a changing climate is now starting to occur,
but with a stronger focus on reacting to past events than on
preparing for a changing future, according to Chris Field, Co-Chair
of Working Group II.
"Climate
change adaptation is not an exotic agenda that has never been tried.
Governments, firms, and communities around the world are building
experience with adaptation," Field said. "This experience
forms a starting point for more ambitious adaptations that will be
important as climate and society continue to change", he said.
Future
risks from a changing climate depend strongly on the amount of future
climate change. Increasing magnitudes of warming increase the
likelihood of severe and pervasive impacts that may be surprising or
irreversible.
"With
high levels of warming that result from continued growth in
greenhouse gas emissions, risks will be challenging to manage, and
even serious, sustained investments in adaptation will face limits,"
said Field.
Climate
change has already affected agriculture, human health, ecosystems on
land and in the oceans, water supplies, and some people's
livelihoods. The striking feature is that they are occurring from the
tropics to the poles, from small islands to large continents, and
from the wealthiest countries to the poorest.
"The
report says that people, societies, and ecosystems are vulnerable
around the world, but with different degree of vulnerability in
different places. Climate change often interacts with other factors
to increase risk," Field said.
Field
added: "Understanding climate change and managing risk, opens a
wide range of opportunities for integrating adaptation with economic
and social development. We definitely face challenges, but
understanding those challenges and tackling them creatively can make
climate change adaptation an important way to help build a more
vibrant world in the near term and beyond."
Chair
of the IPCC Rajendra Pachauri, said: "The Working Group II
report is another important step forward in understanding how to
reduce and manage the risks of climate change. Along with the reports
from Working Group I and Working Group III, it provides a conceptual
map of not only the essential features of the climate challenge but
the options for solutions."
The
Working Group I report was released in September 2013, and the
Working Group III report will be released in April 2014. The IPCC
Fifth Assessment Report cycle concludes with the publication of its
Report in October 2014.
"None
of this would be possible without the dedication of the Co-Chairs of
Working Group II and the hundreds of scientists and experts who
volunteered their time to produce this report, as well as the more
than 1,700 expert reviewers worldwide who contributed their
invaluable oversight," Pachauri said. "The IPCC's reports
are some of the most ambitious scientific undertakings in human
history, and I am humbled by and grateful for the contributions of
everyone who made them possible."
Working
Group II, which assesses impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, is
co-chaired by Vicente Barros of the University of Buenos Aires,
Argentina, and Chris Field of the Carnegie Institution for Science,
USA.
The
Technical Support Unit of Working Group II is hosted by the Carnegie
Institution for Science and funded by the government of the United
States of America
Much
of the extreme weather that wreaked havoc in Asia, Europe and the
Pacific region last year can be blamed on human-induced climate
change, according to the World Meteorological Organization.
The
U.N. weather agency's annual assessment said 2013 was the sixth
warmest year on record. Thirteen of the 14 warmest years have
occurred in the 21st century.
Rising
sea levels has led to increasing damage from storm surges and coastal
flooding, as demonstrated by Typhoon Haiyan, the agency's Secretary
General Michel Jarraud said. The typhoon in November killed 6,100
people and caused $13 billion in damage to the Philippines and
Vietnam. Australia, had its hottest year on record. "Many of the
extreme events of 2013 were consistent with what we would expect as a
result of human-induced climate change," Jarraud said.
He
cited other costly weather disasters such as $22 billion damage from
central European flooding in June, $10 billion in damage from Typhoon
Fitow in China and Japan, and a $10 billion drought in much of China.
Only
a few places, including the central United States, were cooler than
normal last year, but 2013 had no El Nino, the warming of the central
Pacific that happens once every few years and changes rain and
temperature patterns around the world. Jarraud spoke as top climate
scientists and representatives from about 100 governments with the
U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change met in Japan to
complete their latest report on climate change's impact on hunger,
disease, drought, flooding, refugees and war. The risks and overall
effects of climate change are far more immediate and local than
scientists once thought.
It's
not just about melting ice, threatened animals and plants. It's about
the human problems of hunger, disease, drought, flooding, refugees
and war, becoming worse.
Severe
floods, such as the one that displaced 90,000 people in Mozambique in
2008, are now more common in Africa and Australia. Europe and North
America are getting more intense downpours that can be damaging.
Melting ice in the Arctic is not only affecting the polar bears, but
already changing the culture and livelihoods of indigenous people in
northern Canada.
Past
panel reports have been largely ignored because effects of climate
change seemed too distant in time and location and that mentality has
to be changed, says Pennsylvania State University scientist Michael
Mann.
"Climate
change really is a challenge in managing risks," says the
report's chief author, Chris Field of the Carnegie Institution of
Science in California. "It's very clear that we are not prepared
for the kind of events we're seeing."
The
panel predicts that warming temperatures will cause existing
international tensions to rise, the first time it is emphasising the
link between warming temperatures and violence as well as increases
in food prices, decreases in the availability of water, increases in
health problems and decreases in economic growth and poverty
reduction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.