Following our report from yesterday
Company In Which Joe Biden's Son Is Director Prepares To Drill Shale Gas In East Ukraine
25
July, 2014
Recall
what we said earlier today: the proxy Ukraine war just like that in
Syria preceding it, "is all
about energy."
Recall
also the following
chart showing
Ukraine's shale gas deposits, keeping in mind that the Dnieper-Donets
basin which
lies in the hotly contested eastern part of the nation and where as
everyone knows by now a bloody civil war is raging, is
the major oil and gas producing region of Ukraine accounting for
approximately 90 per cent of Ukrainian production and according
to EIA may
have 42 tcf of shale gas resources technically recoverable from 197
tcf of risked shale gas in place.
Finally, recall
our story from May that
Joe Biden's son, Hunter, just joined the board of the largest Ukraine
gas producer Burisma Holdings. From the press
release:
R. Hunter Biden will be in charge of the Holdings’ legal unit and will provide support for the Company among international organizations. On his new appointment, he commented: “Burisma’s track record of innovations and industry leadership in the field of natural gas means that it can be a strong driver of a strong economy in Ukraine. As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
R. Hunter Biden is also a well-known public figure. He is chairman of the Board of the World Food Programme U.S.A., together with the world’s largest humanitarian organization, the United Nations World Food Programme. In this capacity he offers assistance to the poor in developing countries, fighting hunger and poverty, and helping to provide food and education to 300 million malnourished children around the world.
Company Background:
Burisma Holdings is a privately owned oil and gas company with assets in Ukraine and operating in the energy market since 2002. To date, the company holds a portfolio with permits to develop fields in the Dnieper-Donets, the Carpathian and the Azov-Kuban basins. In 2013, the daily gas production grew steadily and at year-end amounted to 11.6 thousand BOE (barrels of oil equivalent – incl. gas, condensate and crude oil), or 1.8 million m3 of natural gas. The company sells these volumes in the domestic market through traders, as well as directly to final consumers.
Now
put it all together and what happens next should be rather clear.
* *
*
Still
confused? It's very simple, really.
In
a nutshell Ukraine (or rather
its puppetmasters)
has decided to let no crisis (staged or otherwise) or rather civil
war, go to waste, and while the fighting rages all around, Ukrainian
troopers are helping to install shale gas production equipment near
the east Ukrainian town of Slavyansk, which was bombed and shelled
for the three preceding months, according to local residents cited
by Itar
Tass.
The reason for the scramble? Under peacetime, the process was
expected to take many years, during which Europe would be under the
energy dictatorship of Putin. But throw in some civil war and few
will notice let alone care that a process which was expected to take
nearly a decade if not longer while dealing with broad popular
objections to fracking, may instead be completed in months!
“Civilians protected by Ukrainian army are getting ready to install drilling rigs. More equipment is being brought in,” they said, adding that the military are encircling the future extraction area.
The people of Slavyansk, which is located in the heart of the Yzovka shale gas field, staged numerous protest actions in the past against its development. They even wanted to call in a referendum on that subject. Environmentalists are particularly concerned with the consequences of hydrofracing, a method used for shale gas extraction, because it implies the use of extremely toxic chemical agents which can poison not only subsoil waters but also the atmosphere. Experts claim that not a single country in the world has invented a method of utilization of harmful toxic agents in the process of development of shale gas deposits.
Countries like the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and France have given up plans to develop shale gas deposits in their territories.
would halt shale-gas drilling for
the next seven years over
groundwater pollution concerns.
Which
clearly makes Ukraine, potentially
the last place with massive shale gas deposits and no drilling
ban,quite
valuable to those who want to develop a major source of shale gas,
one which reduces Europe's reliance on Russian gas even more,
yet one whose future depends on one simple question: who controls
East Ukraine?
Because
what better way to accelerate "next steps" than to start
drilling for gas in the middle of the Donetsk republic as a civil war
is waging in all directions, and where public mood has shifted
decidedly against the local "separatists" in the aftermath
of the MH-17 tragedy.
The
punchline: who will develop the gas field in conjunction with Shell
(jointly owned by the Netherlands and the UK: the two countries that
loathe Putin the most in the aftermath of the MH-17 disaster) which
in May 2012 announced a tender for the right to develop the Yuzovka
shale gas deposit?
Burisma, Ukraine’s oil and gas production holdings, also has the right to develop the shale gas fields in the Dnieper-Donetsk basin of Eastern Ukraine. The same Burisma where R. Hunter Biden, Joseph's son, was appointed a director two months ago.
Q.E.D.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.