I
have previously reported on this HERE
Smith
accused of misleading Parliament
The
Labour Party has launched a privileges complaint against Conservation
Minister Nick Smith, saying he deliberately misled Parliament over
his handling of a submission for the proposed Ruataniwha Dam
16
October, 2013
Last
month, Smith denied allegations that he had meddled in the submission
process for the Hawke's Bay dam project.
The
allegations were centred on a 32-page draft submission prepared by
the Department of Conservation. It raised concerns over the science
being used to mitigate water pollution in the Tukituki catchment.
The
submission was pared down to two paragraphs, which made no mention of
the original concerns, after Smith inquired about the submission.
Smith
has maintained he never saw the original submission, and was only
ever presented with the two-paragraph version.
But
Labour leader David Cunliffe said responses to written questions
raised doubts about Smith's assertions he didn't know about the
original draft submission until it was made public on September 17.
"The
documents show Dr Smith's weekly report dated May 20 discussed the
content of DOC's submission and referred specifically to concerns
about monitoring nitrogen and phosphate levels in the Tukituki River.
"Dr
Smith also claims he first asked DOC to give him a copy of the
submission on July 29. However, his weekly report dated June 24 shows
on June 17 he required DOC to have him approve the submission before
submitting it," Cunliffe said.
"Labour
believes Dr Smith has misled Parliament over what he knew about DOC's
draft submission."
Smith
dismissed those claims while Prime Minister John Key was forced to
defend him in the house today.
Key
said he had full confidence in Smith's handling of the matter.
The
Ruataniwha irrigation scheme would involve the construction of an
80-metre-high dam on the Makaroro River, storing about 9 million
cubic metres of water which would irrigate 20,000-25,000 hectares in
the Ruataniwha Basin.
Hawke's
Bay Regional Council has estimated the project will cost $232
million.
It
would be up to the Speaker of the House to refer the complaint to the
privileges committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.