Friday, 4 October 2013

Greenpeace activists

Greenpeace, Russia and the Infinite Growth Paradigm
Seemorerocks



Recently I wrote an opinion piece in which I defended Vladimir Putin and Russia against the type of attack that comes from the West, typically from liberals.

When confronted with the news of the arrest of Greenpeace activists for protest against Arctic drilling by Russia's Gazprom and their subsequent indictment on charges of piracy by the Murmansk authorities I have to qualify my earlier remarks.

I will admit that, in comparison with habitat destruction, climate collapse, the threat to humanity from radiation from Fukushima – and the continued “business-as-usual” attitude of drilling, fracking and mining wherever humans can, the arrest of a few Greenpeace activists  might on first glance, seem to be insignificant.

When I recently  brought the story to the attention of someone whom I otherwise respect and admire, I was confronted with the following dismissive one-liner - 

No country is perfect. You go Greenpeace”.

Well, maybe? 

But hang on a moment!

This story IS about all of the above. It is about the destruction of the planet by the infinite growth paradigm, by the suicidal and rapacious greed of 'growth at all costs'

Except, this time, we are not talking about America, or Canada, or about BP or Shell: we are talking about Russia  and Gazprom.

Maybe we can feel grateful for the Russians and Putin for pointing out the need for adhering to international law in the Middle East conflicts and for showing us all that the American emperor is without clothes.

But quite what that has to do with Gazprom drilling for oil in the Arctic I don't know.

A few things need to be pointed out. 

 Like, when it comes to dirty industries associated with hydrocarbons, and pollution Russia has no equal – and that includes the US and Canada.

I have yet to see anything to disabuse me of the idea that the Russians are right up there with western oil companies when it comes to climate change denial. 

 I have yet to see but ONE article from the Russian media that talks about climate change, admits that extreme weather events in Russia just might have something to do with the melting of the Arctic ice that allows them to contemplate drilling for oil in the first place, or acknowledges the wildfires in Siberia; or publishes stories about record heat in the Russian Arctic without pictures of girls in bikinis; or acknowledges the existence of methane plumes in the Russian Arctic.

Russia has a vested interest in the infinite growth paradigm

Russia's economy is completely dependent on oil and gas. Take away the oil and gas industry and the current boom in the country that make Moscow and St. Petersburg look so good in comparison with the west, will disappear overnight.

No wonder Mr. Putin does not want any pesky Greenpeace activists scaling his oil and gas wells, any more than any western oil company.

That brings us to Greenpeace.

Greenpeace may not be popular with some people with a distaste for western liberalism, but to say that Russia 'is not perfect' and Greenpeace can 'go away'?!

To say that I take exception to this would be no exaggeration

Although I do not always agree with Greenpeace's corporate 'image' and the implication that activism of the sort they indulge in is going to save the day for our planet, Greenpeace is surely on the right side of the ledger.

It is, I am sure, too late, to do anything to reverse the cooking of the planet and we can only find within ourselves the appropriate response to the near-term extinction of the human species.

For me, at least, the most appropriate response is resistance against empire and the growth paradigm.

That is, in its own way, exactly what Greenpeace, whatever your view of them, is doing.


I find the image of people who are guilty only of peaceful protest and challenging the insane policies of drilling for oil in a melting Arctic being held in cages like murderers, obnoxious.

That is why my support is not with Mr. Putin and his Gazprom, but with the actions of the guys from Greenpeace.

Their actions may be futile, but that's what we need – more futile gestures of defiance not less.


Here is coverage from RT

Greenpeace activists charged with piracy over Russian oil rig protest
A Russian court has formally charged 17 of the 30 Greenpeace activists with piracy. They were arrested in Russia after staging a protest at an Arctic oil rig. The charges that Greenpeace calls “extreme” carry a maximum penalty of up to 15 years in jail.



RT,
3 October, 2013


"It is an extreme and disproportionate charge," Greenpeace International executive director Kumi Naidoo said.

"A charge of piracy is being laid against men and women whose only crime is to be possessed of a conscience. This is an outrage and represents nothing less than an assault on the very principle of peaceful protest," Naidoo said.

The proceedings in a court in the northern city of Murmansk were adjourned on Wednesday evening, but will continue on Thursday.

We believe the charges absolutely unfounded and illegal. Our activists had no motive for taking possession of anyone’s property. There was no crime,” Greenpeace lawyer Mikhail Kreindlin told Interfax.

The prosecution insists Greenpeace activists “posed a real threat” to the personal security of staff and property at the Prirazlomnaya platform and “peaceful” goals do not serve to justify the activists’ actions.

A Greenpeace vessel arrived at the oil rig in September in order to board it and stage a protest against Arctic drilling.

The ship and 30 people onboard were detained a day later by Russian border guards.

The activists, who come from 19 different nations, were arrested and remanded by a court in the city of Murmansk until November 24.

The dubiousness of the allegations was voiced by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who said he didn’t believe that the activists were pirates. But he said they violated international law and could have provoked a serious environmental disaster with their actions.


The uncertainty is driving me crazy’

Meanwhile, rights activists say The Arctic Sunrise jailed crew members are "close to shock" over their “very inhumane” conditions.

Greenpeace has published a letter the Dutch campaigner, Faiza Oulahsen, wrote from her cell, which recounts her experiences in detail - from initially boarding the Greenpeace icebreaker up until a few days ago.

Faiza described her cell as being “ice cold and the lights were on constantly.”

The activist says they are being transported to the FSB office like animals - in buses, that are like dark, locked up metal cages.

Everything is completely against the rules,” Faiza writes. “The things that the FSB is accusing us of are full of all of these inaccuracies and are things they are guilty of themselves. Nothing is certain. You just need someone at the top to think it and we disappear in the cell.”

Other activists also complain of cold cells, a lack of suitable clothing and food.

The detainees are struggling to make themselves understood since virtually none of the prison staff speaks English, the head of a state-connected regional prisoners' rights watchdog, Irina Paikacheva was cited as saying by AFP.

"I have no idea how this is going to end, or how long it's going to take. The uncertainty drives me crazy," Faiza wrote.

At the same time, prosecutors have checked one of the pre-trial detention facilities, where 18 activists are being held, and concluded that there are no violations and that no complains about food and cells have been made. Greenpeace also confirmed earlier that crew members did not complain about conditions.

Meanwhile, Greenpeace supporters rally around the world to protest against Shell and Gazprom’s planned oil drilling in the Arctic and the detention of activists in Russia.

On Wednesday, Greenpeace activists chained themselves to pumps at five gas stations in Berlin.

Greenpeace activist sit at a gas station in Berlin, Germany on October 2, 2013 to stage a protest against the imprisonment of environment protection campaigners in Russia. (AFP Photo / Kay Nietfeld)Greenpeace activist sit at a gas station in Berlin, Germany on October 2, 2013 to stage a protest against the imprisonment of environment protection campaigners in Russia. (AFP Photo / Kay Nietfeld)

Prior to that on Tuesday, Greenpeace protesters interrupted the Champions League match against Schalke as they unfurled a banner protesting against Gazprom, sponsor of both the League and the Bundesliga club.

Play in the Swiss city of Basel was halted for around five minutes after four protesters wearing orange boiler suits and helmets descended slowly on ropes.

The banners read: "Gazprom, don't foul the Arctic" and "Free the Arctic 30".

The protesters then hauled themselves back on to the roof.

The Prirazlomnaya oil rig, which Greenpeace targeted in September, was placed on site in August 2011 and has not been put into commission yet. The owner, Gazprom, initially planned to launch it in early 2012, but postponed the deadline till the 4th quarter of 2013. Greenpeace have staged a similar protest at the rig.

Greenpeace activists put lives of others in danger’

The activists created a dangerous situation by climbing the oil rig, former Greenpeace leader Patrick Moore told RT.

Oil rigs are a very serious operation with big safety issues. You start scaling a rig, people come to try to get you off it, it puts them in danger and so I can certainly understand why they were apprehended and towed away from the site,” Moore said.

Moore believes the activists knowingly and purposefully committed civil disobedience. “I do tend to agree with President Putin that they are not pirates, their intentions were not to loot the rig, but they were still putting people in danger,” he said.

He mentioned that the oil rig in question was designed specifically to make it safer to extract oil. “Greenpeace policy is ridiculous. They live in a dream world where now they are against fossil fuels, against hydro-electric energy, against nuclear energy - which between the three of them supply about 98 percent of the world’s energy. And they seem to think that civilizations can survive on wind and solar alone.”



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.