Martial
Law and the Economy: Is Homeland Security Preparing for the Next Wall
Street Collapse?
Ellen
Brown
7
October, 2013
Reports
are that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is engaged in a
massive, covert military buildup.
An
article in the Associated Press
in February confirmed an open purchase order by DHS for 1.6 billion
rounds of ammunition. According
to an op-ed in Forbes,
that’s enough to sustain an Iraq-sized war for over twenty years.
DHS has also acquired heavily armored tanks, which have been seen
roaming the streets. Evidently somebody in government is expecting
some serious civil unrest. The question is, why?
Recently
revealed statements by former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown at the
height of the banking crisis in October 2008 could give some insights
into that question. An article
on BBC News
on September 21, 2013, drew from an explosive autobiography called
Power
Trip
by Brown’s spin doctor Damian McBride, who said the prime minister
was worried that law and order could collapse during the financial
crisis. McBride quoted Brown as saying:
If
the banks are shutting their doors, and the cash points aren’t
working, and people go to Tesco [a grocery chain] and their cards
aren’t being accepted, the whole thing will just explode.
If
you can’t buy food or petrol or medicine for your kids, people will
just start breaking the windows and helping themselves.
And
as soon as people see that on TV, that’s the end, because everyone
will think that’s OK now, that’s just what we all have to do.
It’ll be anarchy. That’s what could happen tomorrow.
How
to deal with that threat? Brown said, “We’d have to think: do we
have curfews, do we put the Army on the streets, how do we get order
back?”
McBride
wrote in his book Power
Trip,
“It was extraordinary to see Gordon so totally gripped by the
danger of what he was about to do, but equally convinced that
decisive action had to be taken immediately.” He compared the
threat to the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Fear
of this threat was echoed in September 2008 by US Treasury Secretary
Hank Paulson, who reportedly
warned
that the US government might have to resort to martial law if Wall
Street were not bailed out from the credit collapse.
In
both countries, martial law was avoided when their legislatures
succumbed to pressure and bailed out the banks. But many pundits are
saying that another collapse is imminent; and this time, governments
may not be so willing to step up to the plate.
The
Next Time WILL Be Different
What
triggered the 2008 crisis
was a run, not in the conventional banking system, but in the
“shadow” banking system, a collection of non-bank financial
intermediaries that provide services similar to
traditional commercial banks but are unregulated. They
include
hedge funds, money market funds, credit investment funds,
exchange-traded funds, private equity funds, securities broker
dealers, securitization and finance companies. Investment banks
and commercial banks may also conduct much of their business in the
shadows of this unregulated system.
The
shadow financial casino has only grown larger since 2008; and in the
next Lehman-style collapse, government bailouts may not be available.
According to President Obama in his remarks
on the Dodd-Frank Act
on July 15, 2010, “Because of this reform, . . . there will be no
more taxpayer funded bailouts – period.”
Governments
in Europe are also shying away from further bailouts. The Financial
Stability Board (FSB) in Switzerland has therefore required the
systemically risky banks to devise “living wills” setting forth
what they will do in the event of insolvency. The template
established by the FSB requires them to “bail in” their
creditors; and depositors, it turns out, are the largest class of
bank creditor. (For fuller discussion, see my earlier article here.)
When
depositors cannot access their bank accounts to get money for food
for the kids, they could well start breaking store windows and
helping themselves. Worse, they might plot to overthrow the
financier-controlled government. Witness Greece, where increasing
disillusionment with the ability of the government to rescue the
citizens from the worst depression since 1929 has precipitated riots
and threats of violent overthrow.
Fear
of that result could explain the massive, government-authorized
spying on American citizens, the domestic use of drones, and the
elimination of due process and of “posse comitatus” (the federal
law prohibiting the military from enforcing “law and order” on
non-federal property). Constitutional protections are being thrown
out the window in favor of protecting the elite class in power.
The
Looming Debt Ceiling Crisis
The
next crisis on the agenda appears to be the October 17th deadline for
agreeing on a federal budget or risking
default
on the government’s loans. It may only be a coincidence, but two
large-scale drills are scheduled to take place the same day, the
“Great
ShakeOut Earthquake Drill”
and the “Quantum
Dawn 2 Cyber Attack Bank Drill.”
According to a Bloomberg news clip on the bank drill, the attacks
being prepared for are from hackers, state-sponsored espionage, and
organized crime (financial fraud). One interviewee stated, “You
might experience that your online banking is down . . . . You might
experience that you can’t log in.” It sounds like a dress
rehearsal for the Great American Bail-in.
Ominous
as all this is, it has a bright side. Bail-ins and martial law can be
seen as the last desperate thrashings of a dinosaur. The exploitative
financial scheme responsible for turning millions out of their jobs
and their homes has reached the end of the line. Crisis in the
current scheme means opportunity for those more sustainable solutions
waiting in the wings.
Other
countries faced with a collapse in their debt-based borrowed
currencies have survived and thrived by issuing their own. When the
dollar-pegged currency collapsed in Argentina in 2001, the national
government returned to issuing its own pesos; municipal governments
paid with “debt-canceling bonds” that circulated as currency; and
neighborhoods traded with community currencies. After the German
currency collapsed in the 1920s, the government turned the economy
around in the 1930s by issuing “MEFO” bills that circulated as
currency. When England ran out of gold in 1914, the
government issued “Bradbury pounds”
similar to the Greenbacks issued by Abraham Lincoln during the US
Civil War.
Today
our government could avoid the debt ceiling crisis by doing something
similar: it could simply mint some trillion dollar coins and deposit
them in an account. That alternative could be pursued by the
Administration immediately, without going to Congress or changing the
law, as discussed in my earlier article here.
It need not be inflationary, since Congress could still spend only
what it passed in its budget. And if Congress did expand its budget
for infrastructure and job creation, that would actually be good for
the economy, since hoarding
cash and paying down loans
have significantly shrunk the circulating money supply.
Peer-to-peer
Trading and Public Banks
At
the local level, we need to set up an alternative system that
provides safety for depositors, funds small and medium-sized
businesses, and serves the needs of the community.
Much
progress has already been made on that front in the peer-to-peer
economy. In a September 27th article titled “Peer-to-Peer
Economy Thrives as Activists Vacate the System,”
Eric Blair reports that the Occupy Movement is engaged in a peaceful
revolution in which people are abandoning the established system in
favor of a “sharing economy.” Trading occurs between individuals,
without taxes, regulations or licenses, and in some cases without
government-issued currency.
Peer-to-peer
trading happens largely on the Internet, where customer reviews
rather than regulation keep sellers honest. It started with eBay and
Craigslist and has grown exponentially since. Bitcoin is a private
currency outside the prying eyes of regulators. Software is being
devised that circumvents
NSA spying.
Bank loans are being shunned in favor of crowdfunding. Local food
co-ops are also a form of opting out of the corporate-government
system.
Peer-to-peer
trading works for local exchange, but we also need a way to protect
our dollars, both public and private. We need dollars to pay at least
some of our bills, and businesses need them to acquire raw materials.
We also need a way to protect our public revenues, which are
currently deposited and invested in Wall Street banks that have heavy
derivatives exposure.
To
meet those needs, we can set up publicly-owned banks on the model of
the Bank of North Dakota, currently our only state-owned depository
bank. The BND is mandated by law to receive all the state’s
deposits and to serve the public interest. Ideally, every state would
have one of these “mini-Feds.” Counties and cities could have
them as well. For more information, see
http://PublicBankingInstitute.org.
Preparations
for martial law have been reported for decades, and it hasn’t
happened yet. Hopefully, we can sidestep that danger by moving into a
saner, more sustainable system that makes military action against
American citizens unnecessary.
Ellen
Brown
is an attorney, president of the Public
Banking Institute,
and author of twelve books, including the best-selling Web
of Debt.
In The
Public Bank Solution,
her latest book, she explores successful public banking models
historically and globally. Her 200-plus blog articles are at
EllenBrown.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.