‘Nobody
understands’ spills at Alberta oil sands operation
Oil
spills at an oil sands operation in Cold Lake, Alberta have been
going on for weeks with no end in sight, according to a government
scientist.
26
January, 2013
Oil
spills at a major oil sands operation in Alberta have been ongoing
for at least six weeks and have cast doubts on the safety of
underground extraction methods, according to documents obtained by
the Star and a government scientist who has been on site.
Canadian
Natural Resources Ltd. has been unable to stop an underground oil
blowout that has killed numerous animals and contaminated a lake,
forest, and muskeg at its operations in Cold Lake, Alta.
The
documents indicate that, since cleanup started in May, some 26,000
barrels of bitumen mixed with surface water have been removed,
including more than 4,500 barrels of bitumen.
The
scientist said Canadian Natural Resources is not disclosing the scope
of spills in four separate sites, which have been off bounds to media
and the public because the operations are on the Cold Lake Air
Weapons Range, where there is active weapons testing by the Canadian
military.
The
company says it is effectively managing and cleaning up the spills.
“The
areas have been secured and the emulsion is being managed with clean
up, recovery and reclamation activities well underway. The presence
of emulsion on the surface does not pose a health or human safety
risk. The sites are located in a remote area which has restricted
access to the public. The emulsion is being effectively cleaned up
with manageable environmental impact,” the company said in a
statement.
The
documents and photos show dozens of animals, including beavers and
loons, have died, and that 30,600 kg of oily vegetation has been
cleared from the latest of the four spill zones.
The
company’s operations use an “in situ” or underground extraction
technology called “cyclic steam stimulation,” which involves
injecting thousands of gallons of superhot, high-pressure steam into
deep underground reservoirs. This heats and liquefies the hard
bitumen and creates cracks through which the bitumen flows and is
then pumped to the surface.
The
scientist, who asked not to be named for fear of losing their job,
said the operation was in chaos.
“Everybody
(at the company and in government) is freaking out about this,”
said the scientist. “We don’t understand what happened. Nobody
really understands how to stop it from leaking, or if they do they
haven’t put the measures into place.”
In
response to emailed questions from the Star, Canadian Natural
Resources said it was co-operating with the regulator.
“We
are investigating the likely cause of the occurrence, which we
believe to be mechanical,” the company said.
“Canadian
Natural has existing groundwater monitoring in place and we are
undertaking aquatic and sediment sampling to monitor and mitigate any
potential impacts. As part of our wildlife mitigation program,
wildlife deterrents have been deployed in the area to protect
wildlife.
“We
are saddened that unfortunately some animal fatalities occurred
between the time of the incident and the deployment of our animal
deterrent systems. All of the fatalities have been reported to the
Alberta Energy Regulator.”
The
company added that it has “taken appropriate steps to ensure no
additional impact to wildlife or the environment and that the
incident site is reclaimed.”
Canadian
Natural Resources did not respond to the charge that they aren’t
disclosing the scope of the spills.
Oil
companies have said in situ methods are more environmentally friendly
than the open-pit mining often associated with the Alberta oil sands,
but in situ is more carbon and water-intensive.
“In
the course of injecting steam they’ve created fractures from the
reservoir to the surface that they didn’t expect,” said the
scientist, who is speaking out over concern that neither the company
nor Alberta’s regulatory bodies would properly address the
situation.
On
Thursday, the Alberta Energy Regulator confirmed there were four
spills in the last few months, and ordered Canadian Natural Resources
to restrict its steam injections and enhance monitoring at the
operations in Cold Lake.
Regulator
official Bob Curran said the latest spill is spread across 40
hectares.
Canadian
Natural Resources disputed that figure Friday. “We have the mapped
area impacted to be significantly less than 40 hectares with the area
being reduced daily through effective cleanup efforts,” the company
said.
Critics
say such spills raise questions about the safety and viability of in
situ extraction, which by 2020 is expected to account for as much as
40 per cent of Canada’s oil sands production, because many of
Alberta’s deposits cannot be mined.
“This
is a new kind of oil spill and there is no ‘off button,’ ” said
Keith Stewart, an energy analyst with Greenpeace who teaches a course
on energy policy and environment at the University of Toronto. “You
can’t cap it like a conventional oil well or turn off a valve on a
pipeline.
“You
are pressurizing the oil bed so hard that it’s no wonder that it
blows out. This means that the oil will continue to leak until the
well is no longer pressurized,” which means the bitumen could be
seeping from the ground for months.
The
company said the process is sound and has a good track record over 30
years in Alberta. It said that nevertheless it is reviewing its
wellbores “to enhance wellbore integrity and modify steaming
strategies to prevent the remote possibility of these events in the
future.”
The
Cold Lake operations are on the traditional territory of the Beaver
Lake Cree First Nation, which is pursuing a constitutional challenge
that argues the cumulative impacts of oil sands industrial
development are infringing their treaty rights to hunt, fish and
trap.
As
well, the First Nation says there are graves alongside the lake in
the area affected by the spills, and that band members have been
unable to access that area.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.