Posts
This
article focuses on the Australian media
Media
lies and distortion
ATTENTION
ALL PEOPLE OF THE WORLD, PLEASE READ THIS VERY IMPORTANT MESSAGE!!!
Today,
for the first time in a month, I watched the ABC television channel
and read the Daily Telegraph newspaper here in Australia. I did so
because today the first official report on the MH17 findings was
released. In view of a number of very serious unsubstantiated claims
and highly Russophobic nature demonstrated in the coverage of this
report in the aforementioned media outlets, we would like to urge The
President of Russia and the Russian Embassy here in Australia to
provide an evidence-based response for the benefit of our Australian
colleagues and partners.
This
kind of ‘journalism’ seeks to attribute the blame to Russia and
its President, thereby fomenting unjustified and undeserved hatred
towards Russia and its people. After all, Russia and Australia were
allies in two World Wars and our predecessors bravely sacrificed
their lives to extinguish the inhumane, barbaric, xenophobic and
racist flame of fascism that is being passionately reignited by the
junta in Kiev that our Western colleagues and partners shamefully
call the ‘Ukrainian government’.
The
official report claims that the BUK missile system that allegedly
shot down the MH17 was manufactured in Russia, but it is not yet
known who used it and that there is an ongoing criminal investigation
into this matter. However, the fact is that Russia stopped producing
this kind of BUK missile system since 1986 and stopped selling it
since 2011. During that time, the Ukrainian government purchased this
BUK missile system from Russia, which points the finger back towards
the Fascist junta in Kiev that our Western colleagues and partners
shamefully call the ‘Ukrainian government’.
Furthermore,
the fact is that this tragedy took place on Ukrainian territory after
Ukrainian air traffic control directed a civilian airliner directly
in the path of a war zone. Hence, a number of very important
questions remain to be answered by the investigating international
aviation authorities.
Firstly,
‘why was airspace over the warzone not closed for civilian flights,
especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar
navigation systems?’
Secondly,
‘why did Ukraine’s Security Service start working with the
recordings of communications between Ukrainian air traffic
controllers and the Boeing crew and with the data storage systems
from Ukrainian radars without waiting for international
investigators?’
In
view of these unanswered questions it is highly irresponsible and
inappropriate for the Australian media to be making statements such
as ‘but of course we already know who did it…’, ‘Russia and
Putin should be held accounted, and must pay to the family victims
the compensations’.
Our
heartfelt and sincerest prayers go out to all our dear fellow
Australians that lost their lives in the MH17 tragedy, and indeed to
all those who lost their lives in this tragedy. May God give all
their family and friends the comfort and peace that they seek and may
the Souls of their Loved Ones Rest In Peace. Like the Russian
Government and Russian Embassy here in Australia we too sincerely
hope that a truly ‘impartial mechanism’ can be established ‘to
fairly prosecute all those responsible’.
Out
of respect for the Dearly Departed we ask you, the people of the
world, please do not jump to false conclusions about Russia based on
the abhorrent propaganda and lies being peddled in the Australian
mass media and by the American corporate Fascist state. Please do not
allow the Australian and Western media to fool you! Shame on you
Australia and Western media, this is not journalism, this is a
sickening attempt to make profit from the pain and suffering of
innocent people and their loved ones!
The
fact is that ‘Despite making many claims about the cause of the
crash, the U.S. has refused to share the hardest evidence of all: the
satellite imagery immediately prior, immediately after and, if
available, at the moment of the attack and the downing of MH17’. In
view of this, we urge the Australian government and media to use
their leverage with their American friends to influence them to hand
over the hard data that is required to solve this crime.
The
so called ‘Pro Russians Separatists’ did the right thing and
handed over the two black box flight recorders to investigators, and
we say it is high time that the Americans followed suit.
Let
us not forget that in 2001, when a Russian Tu-154 crashed into the
Black Sea the Ukrainian authorities denied any involvement on the
part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces until irrefutable evidence proved
Kiev to be guilty.
In
view of this, we find it astonishing that the Australian government
and media wilfully support the Nazi Fascist junta in Kiev that uses
heavy weapons and artillery against civilians, and which our Western
colleagues and partners shamefully call the ‘Ukrainian government’.
The
root cause of the war in Eastern Ukraine is that the majority of the
population refuse to recognize the illegitimate regime in Kiev that
was thrust upon them by the regime’s state and corporate sponsors
in the West. Please do not let these traitors fool you, for they are
the very reason that 298 innocent people (including 38 of our fellow
Australians) lost their lives on board that fateful flight.
People
of the world, we call on you to wake up and stand against the dirty
tricks and propaganda being peddled by journalists in the Australian
media. It is time for Western and Australian media outlets to
publicly apologize and be held to account for the hatred that they
are stirring up between the Nations of Russia and Australia that
fought together as allies in two World Wars.
PLEASE
SHARE THIS TO LET THE WORLD KNOW THE TRUTH!!!
Written
by Natalia Semenov
Edited
by Maxim Zorin
The Guardian does it again!
Guardian
makes “error” reading MH17 report, accuses rebels of cover up
14
October, 2015
In
an article compiled by Luke
Harding,
Shaun Walker and Julian Borger, entitled “MH17
report suggests efforts were made to cover up causes of disaster”,
and published October 13, the Guardian claimed the Dutch report on
the downing of MH17 alleged there was evidence of a “bungled
autopsy” and attempt to “remove foreign objects” from the body
of the first officer. The implication was that this had been done in
order to conceal the cause of the crash, and the further implication
was of course that Russia and the rebels had been involved.
The
report by the Dutch safety board said that more than 120 objects,
“mostly metal fragments”, were found in the body of the first
officer, who had sustained “multiple fractures”.. When Dutch
experts identified the captain’s body they found it had already
“undergone an external and internal examination to remove foreign
objects”.
Despite
apparent attempts to remove shrapnel, “hundreds of metal objects
were found”, the report said, as well as bone fractures and other
injuries.
After
this appeared a rebuttal
was posted BTL,
by the CiFer known as Pigswiggle, who showed conclusively the report
made no such claim, or anything remotely like such a claim.
This
is a really bizarre inference
[…]
The
report is merely explaining that the Captain from Team A was not
chosen by the public prosecutor as one of the bodies for further
“detailed examination.” The Dutch authorities “found” that
the Captain’s body “had already ‘undergone an external and
internal examination to remove foreign objects,'” because it was
part of the investigation procedure that all the bodies were
subjected to (as described in the preceding paragraphs of the
report). The Guardian is attempting to accuse Russia of a “cover
up” based on the investigative actions of the Netherlands Forensic
Institute. Indeed, according to the report, the persons responsible
for having removed foreign objects from the Captain was a team of
“120 forensic specialists from the National Forensic Investigations
Team (LTFO) from the Netherlands and 80 forensic specialists from
Australia, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Malaysia,
and New Zealand.”
The
Guardian needs to correct this story. It is highly embarrassing to it
and its journalists.
Following
this, and other complaints, October 14 the Guardian issued what
amounted to a retraction:
and
reworded the offending part of the article to read:
The
report by the Dutch safety board said that more than 120 objects,
“mostly metal fragments”, were found in the body of the first
officer, who had sustained “multiple fractures”. Dutch experts
performed an “external and internal examination on the the
captain’s body” and removed “hundreds of metal fragments”.
They also observed bone fractures and other injuries.
Shaun
Walker even tweeted the retraction:
Shaun Walker
We made a change to this story. There's enough confusion/disinfo already so apologies for inadvertently adding to it
Some
cynical commenters have pointed out this “error” has had the
result of spreading a false and baseless rumour of Russian
evidence-tampering around the web. A rumour that the foot-noted
retraction will do little to quell – especially since they did not
see fit to also change their grossly misleading headline, which as of
20:00 BST October 14 still reads thus:
Which
means to all intents and purposes the lie is left to stand,
“retraction” or no.
Is
this ethical journalism?
Anyone
who wants to register their opinion on this and/or ask for further
correction can write to the Guardian here:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.