Combat report: Russia destroys over 1,600 terrorist targets in first month of aerial bombings
©
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation / Facebook
30
October, 2015
The
Russian Air Force has conducted some 1,400 sorties in Syria since the
start of Moscow's anti-terror operation. They have eliminated more
than 1,600 terrorist targets in one month, the Ministry of Defense
said.
Among the destroyed targets are 249 command posts,
51 militants' training camps, 131 ammunition and fuel depots and 786
field bases, Colonel General Andrey Kartapolov of Russia's General
Staff said on Friday.
Despite
Islamic State's "considerable losses and mass walkout,"
it's too early to talk about "complete victory" over the
terrorists in Syria, Kartapolov stressed, adding the militants are
continuing their stand against Syrian government troops in a number
of regions. But "all their [terrorists'] efforts of counter
attacks have been timely suppressed by the Syrian Army," the
Russian military official said.
In
some regions, it is more difficult to defeat the jihadists. Over the
years they have turned the areas into powerful organized tactical
localities, with a wide network of underground passages and hideouts,
Kartapolov said.
Commanders from several militant groups
that were part of Al-Nusra Front, have decided to join the ranks of
the so-called "moderate opposition," the General Staff
said, adding that in this way they hope "to receive political
and financial support from abroad."
Trying
to stop the decreasing number of fighters, Islamic State is
redeploying forces into Syria from Iraq and other neighboring
countries, Kartapolov said, adding that this move is now being widely
observed in the Aleppo province. To prevent their fighters from
deserting, Islamic State also publicly executes the militants who try
to flee, the Russian military said.
The
Russian Air Force began carrying out airstrikes against Islamic State
(IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) targets in Syria on September 30, "in
accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander of the Russian
Armed Forces, Vladimir Putin." The Ministry of Defense has been
providing regular combat reports on the mission, the deadline of
which is classified.
Due to the increased amount of
confirmed intelligence information on IS facilities, the number of
Russian fighter jets sorties has considerably risen since the launch
of the mission, with more jihadists' targets hit and destroyed.
A
week into the anti-terror mission, Russian Navy joined Russia's Air
Force in the operation, with four Russian warships
having launchedmissiles
against Islamic State in Syria. The attacks came from Russia's fleet
in the Caspian Sea, which borders Russia, Iran and three other
littoral countries; the precision weapons hit all intended targets.
With
warplanes of the Russian Air Space Forces having destroyed units of
military equipment, communication centers, arms and fuel depots
belonging to IS terrorists, as well as plants producing explosives,
field camps and bases, militants have lost "most"
of their ammunition, heavy vehicles and equipment, the Defense
Ministry said. Growing numbers of jihadists appeared to have become
discontent with their command and reportedly deserted IS
ranks.
During
the ongoing operation in Syria, with the Russian military providing
air support to Syrian Army troops, Syrian President Bashar
Assadvisited Moscow
and held talks with Vladimir Putin. Before Moscow launched its
operation in the Middle Eastern country, Syrian government had asked
for Russia's help, which became the legal ground for sending troops
to Syria.
Among the destroyed targets are 249 command posts, 51 militants' training camps, 131 ammunition and fuel depots and 786 field bases, Colonel General Andrey Kartapolov of Russia's General Staff said on Friday.
Despite Islamic State's "considerable losses and mass walkout," it's too early to talk about "complete victory" over the terrorists in Syria, Kartapolov stressed, adding the militants are continuing their stand against Syrian government troops in a number of regions. But "all their [terrorists'] efforts of counter attacks have been timely suppressed by the Syrian Army," the Russian military official said.
In some regions, it is more difficult to defeat the jihadists. Over the years they have turned the areas into powerful organized tactical localities, with a wide network of underground passages and hideouts, Kartapolov said.
Commanders from several militant groups that were part of Al-Nusra Front, have decided to join the ranks of the so-called "moderate opposition," the General Staff said, adding that in this way they hope "to receive political and financial support from abroad."
Trying to stop the decreasing number of fighters, Islamic State is redeploying forces into Syria from Iraq and other neighboring countries, Kartapolov said, adding that this move is now being widely observed in the Aleppo province. To prevent their fighters from deserting, Islamic State also publicly executes the militants who try to flee, the Russian military said.
The Russian Air Force began carrying out airstrikes against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) targets in Syria on September 30, "in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander of the Russian Armed Forces, Vladimir Putin." The Ministry of Defense has been providing regular combat reports on the mission, the deadline of which is classified.
Due to the increased amount of confirmed intelligence information on IS facilities, the number of Russian fighter jets sorties has considerably risen since the launch of the mission, with more jihadists' targets hit and destroyed.
A week into the anti-terror mission, Russian Navy joined Russia's Air Force in the operation, with four Russian warships having launchedmissiles against Islamic State in Syria. The attacks came from Russia's fleet in the Caspian Sea, which borders Russia, Iran and three other littoral countries; the precision weapons hit all intended targets.
During the ongoing operation in Syria, with the Russian military providing air support to Syrian Army troops, Syrian President Bashar Assadvisited Moscow and held talks with Vladimir Putin. Before Moscow launched its operation in the Middle Eastern country, Syrian government had asked for Russia's help, which became the legal ground for sending troops to Syria.
Syria SITREP October 31st, 2015 by John Rambo
The
Middle East Wars
The
Middle East is once again swept up in wars. Not since the early 80s
has the Middle East experienced such a wide array of conflicts. Not
only do we have the mother of all proxy wars in Syria but also a slew
of campaigns and operations dotting the entire region and greater
area from tribal skirmishes to transnational conflicts.
In
tangent with the Syrian crisis is the Iraqi civil war, which has been
continuous since the fall of the Saddam’s Iraq by US forces. Modern
Iraq has rarely known peace. From the Iran-Iraq war, the two gulf
wars, and now this never ending civil war. These conflicts have
warped Iraq on multiple levels. The ghost of the Iraqi army is what
we know as ISIL today. [Source]
There
is the Yemen war which pits multiple belligerents in another
Iran-Saudi proxy war between Houthi Yemenis (who are predominantly
Shia but have large Sunni support) against the old and ousted
Hadi-loyalist Yemeni government. Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State are
also prominent in this fight.
Next
is the Egyptian campaign in the Sinai against Islamists. This
campaign has been ongoing since the fall of Mubarak and has increased
in intensity after the military coup by Sisi that ousted the
democratically elected Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.
In
the greater Middle East we have the Libyan civil war, the natural
aftermath of the fall of Gaddafi. Thanks to the level of lawlessness
Islamists have been able to establish a significant presence; one of
these factions is no other than ISIL.
After
Gaddafi fell there was a period of chaos in which militia groups
fought each other. The lawlessness allowed petty fights to escalate
into tribal and faction wars.
Today the fighting has evolved between the newly elected government,
recognized by the West, and the old (post-Gaddafi) government comprising of various political factions (the Brotherhood amongst them) which refuse to acknowledge the earlier elections due to the fact large parts of the country were denied the vote either through security concerns or no feasible means of reaching a voting center.
Today the fighting has evolved between the newly elected government,
recognized by the West, and the old (post-Gaddafi) government comprising of various political factions (the Brotherhood amongst them) which refuse to acknowledge the earlier elections due to the fact large parts of the country were denied the vote either through security concerns or no feasible means of reaching a voting center.
These
wars have drawn in many international actors. Any EU country with a
military has been involved in one or more of these conflicts. Of
course they’ve been overshadowed by two heavy hitters, the United
States of America and the Russian Federation.
This
is the first time for Russia to take a more overt role in the
campaigns of the Middle East. What was once considered United States
territory is now being challenge politically, through the media, and
even militarily (shows of force are not “peace-making”
moves).
The
Russian airbase in Latakia looks like one massive commercial of
Russian equipment. Russia has been part of the club of “tested in
combat” weapon suppliers for some time (Israel, the US, and
sometimes the UK are part of this exclusive club) but now, in the age
of HD video, the world is witnessing Russian power in the same way
the First Gulf War displayed US precision weapons from the nose
cameras of bombs dropped in Iraq.
The
cruise missiles were the cream of the sales pitch. Now YOU TOO can
own accurate cruise missiles without paying an arm and a leg to
Raytheon.
Syria in itself is an even larger commercial of Russian capabilities. Alternative protection to legitimate presidents in third-world countries that may be threatened by Western intervention. Russia can provide political cover as well as the capability to move heads of state in and out of countries without world powers noticing. In today’s digital age of hyper-intelligence gathering a feat in itself.
Syria in itself is an even larger commercial of Russian capabilities. Alternative protection to legitimate presidents in third-world countries that may be threatened by Western intervention. Russia can provide political cover as well as the capability to move heads of state in and out of countries without world powers noticing. In today’s digital age of hyper-intelligence gathering a feat in itself.
One might even say it’s not the destruction of the Islamic State or the opposition forces in Syria that upset the United States, but the fact a competitor supplier is advertising their goods in the same Hollywood manner as they are fond of doing.
But the fighting doesn’t stop just in these countries. It continues to extend into countries like Turkey engaged in another operation against the Kurds in “Kurdistan”. In Afghanistan the Taliban are engaged in a prolonged nationalist war against the US-led occupation. There is spillover from the Syrian conflict into Lebanon from time to time and finally there is a potential boiling point in Israel and Palestine.
It’s safe to say this is only the beginning to something potentially larger which may engulf the entire region in one contiguous war.
Here
is what is occurring in the core Middle Eastern theatre right now:
Syria:
• Pro-government
Syrian forces are making gains slowly in areas of operation. The
strategy has revealed itself as a slow encroachment on rebel
positions. Every area captured by the government is locked down and
reinforced until the next assault.
• Assault,
capture, hold, reinforce, repeat.
• This
war has seen its fair share of booby traps and other dirty tricks.
Syrian forces have had to deal with mines and IEDs in recaptured
territory. Possibly as a rebel/ISIL tactic to slow down Syrian
assaults while retreating. Syrian military has also dished out its
fair share of sabotage ammunition to opposition groups. [Source]
• Although
very costly and time consuming, sabotage/spiked ammunition does add a
huge psychological factor in deterring insurgencies and organized
resistance. Opposition units will begin to distrust their supplies
reducing morale. Should a sabotage round be cooked off it could
disable the weapon or more effectively outright kill the operator.
[Source]
• The
SAA has allowed avenues of escape to remain open for Islamist
fighters. This is to prevent any “last-stands” by the
near-suicidal and desperate Islamists.
• There
was talk about Assad committing to preliminary elections; probably
the fallout of the meeting in Moscow (more below). [Source]
• The
government has had issues securing supply lines since the onset of
the war. These issues have always plagued offensives which need a
consistent influx of supplies to maintain the momentum.
• The
government has established checkpoints to monitor the roads and to
deploy rapid reaction teams to assist convoys under attack.
• However
the manpower shortage does mean some checkpoints won’t be as
reinforced as others.
• A
strategic depopulation of Syria has been underway for some time,
resulting in the EU refugee crisis. May also be called human capital
flight. By having Germany say it’ll take in as many refugees as it
can and by encouraging the conflict to continue more and more of the
moderate educated Syrians will leave Syria and the refugee camps of
Turkey and Jordan for a better life in Europe and the US [Source]
Iraq:
• Co-ordination
with Syria, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah has allowed the Iraqi army to
continue rooting out ISIL and other supporting militias from Baiji.
• The
Iraqi army is being supported by the Popular Committee militias.
• The
Popular Committee militias are a predominately Shia organization
which houses a multitude of tribal or independent Shia militias in
Iraq.
• The
Mahdi army, a once disbanded militia which had succeeded in fighting
US occupational forces in the past, has been remobilized to help deal
with ISIL. [Source]
• These
militias were a real issue for both the US occupational forces and
the new Iraqi military during that time [Source]
• The
Mahdi army is one of the few militias outside Palestine to experience
Israeli-like tactics of population control blockades and sieges in
the hopes of destroying its power base (siege of Sadr city) [Source]
• Since
the fall of Saddam the Iraqi army has gained some experience fighting
against the Shia-militias in an operation to disarm them. [Source]
Iran/Hezbollah:
• Some
slightly increased causalities of IRGC personnel reflect the
increased involvement over the past week.
• Iran
continues to flex its military capabilities and more importantly its
independent military-industrial complex hardened over decades of
sanctions. [Source]
• Iran
has consistently had some kind of force operating in Iraq against
ISIL and even forces that were once operating against US forces
including the infamous Karbala HQ attack carried supported by the
Quds Force [Source]
• The
attackers were dressed in US military gear and managed to slip by
security. The entire operation was retaliation against US raids
targeted towards Iranian diplomatic missions inside Iraq. [Source]
• The
increased presence in Syria will reflect how well Iran can commit in
deploying combat ground forces on two fronts (albeit in small elite
numbers).
• IRGC
forces are more eager and motivated, some men being trained for over
a year for the mission in Syria which includes a heavy dose of urban
warfare tactics. [Source]
• Iran
not only has Russia as a potential ally but both India and China have
helped it stay afloat through its many years of sanctions. China has
always been a customer of Iranian oil and natural gas and India at
one point was paying Iran in gold to circumvent international
sanctions aimed at Iran [Source]
• It’s
only a matter of time now before Iran officially joins the SCO
(Shanghai Cooperation Organization) of which China and Russia (along
with Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan) are founding members.
The SCO is a semi-NATO-like organization which extends to economic
and political cohesion as well as military collaboration [Source]
• Iran
has finally been included in talks regarding the Syrian conflict,
along with Turkey, Russia, the US, and Saudi Arabia. [Source]
• Hassan
Nasrallah, secretary general of Hezbollah, has made a public speech
at the end of the Ashura procession in person. For those that do not
know: this man is very high up on Israel’s hit list. Most
definitely top 5. When he used to make speeches in the past he would
have to do it behind bulletproof glass. Today his speeches are
digital and more frequent (unfortunately bulletproof is not
air-strike bomb proof). [Source]
Russia:
• It
seems like Russia is trying to create a political coalition to solve
the Syrian problem.
• Russia
had extended a hand to aid the FSA in its fight against Islamists and
ISIL and to find a solution to the crisis. [Source]
• Russia
has been talking to many opposition group representatives that claim
to be “FSA” but these people have openly admitted there is no
single unified command. [Source]
• It
seems the FSA is what rebels take on as a brand name while the Army
of Conquest is the Islamist with operation rooms inside Turkey and
Jordan.
• Russia
has begun talking to Jordan and has opened an intelligence
co-ordination center. Jordanian intelligence and Special Forces are
some of the more professional forces inside the Middle East. The King
of Jordan has a gift of always playing both sides to keep his country
afloat in ANY situation. [Source]
• Iraqi
government has allowed Russia to commit airstrikes inside Iraq proper
against ISIL. It’s unknown if Russia will or will not expand its
operations; perhaps by deploying forward aircraft in relatively-safe
Iran it may be able to launch airstrikes inside Iraq.
• Russia
has the ability to use strategic bombers but operating those would be
costly for its effect (to kill a few militants).
• Assad,
the Syrian president, made a secret visit to Moscow and back without
the notice of the megalithic US intelligence community. [Source]
• The
high-level meeting may be to inform Assad of future political moves
Russia might commit (and thus not to surprise Assad).
• It
could be Russian cordiality, informing Assad that perhaps he might
actually have to step down a lot sooner than expected. A call would
have sufficed but Russians are really cordial people and such news
should be said in person.
• It
might be about increased military and intelligence cooperation. After
all is there a base outside the ex-Soviet Union under Russian
administration asides from Tartus? Is Russia willing to give that up
with Assad?
• It
may well be a large PR stunt to the world. Russia can get you out and
back in your country with the Americans watching. That’s quite an
achievement,
especially to small countries that once assumed the US knows all, sees all, and can kill all, all the time any time.
especially to small countries that once assumed the US knows all, sees all, and can kill all, all the time any time.
• A
Russian soldier appears to have committed suicide at Latakia air
base. The official reason was depression due to a breakup with his
girlfriend. [Source]
• The
parents deny that their son would do a thing like that over a girl.
Suicides in deployments do happen especially if they’ve had recent
relationship problems. 19 year olds are known to be the most
emotionally stable people on the planet, especially when it comes to
relationships. But there is also talk of potentially multiple
injuries on his body. What exactly those injuries are have ranged
from lacerations on his wrists and body (suicidal ideation) to burns
and crushed bones from an explosion (could be a lucky rocket or
mortar that landed in the airbase). His body has already been
returned and buried in his hometown. IF (big if) this was really a
non-suicide it was most likely the typical story: Soldier goes AWOL
for an hour from base to buy a pack of cigarettes in town, gets
spotted by some insurgent/ISIL, barely makes it back alive (or has
his body retrieved by Russian special forces on the ground).
• I’m
probably going to get stabbed for this but…here goes:
• There
is SOME talk that the slight dip in air strikes by the Russian Air
Force deployed at Latakia is due to the fighter jets being pushed
hard in consistent non-stop sorties. [Source]
• Of
course the other aspect can be a logistical shortage, but that’s
doubtful as proper planning negates that. It’s highly unlikely the
Ministry of Defense would not have calculated the required munitions,
spare parts, and fuel required for continuous air strikes in Syria.
• With
the absurdly large number of sorties flown by the Russian Air Force
in Syria it’s not hard to believe there is a strain on hardware.
But then again generally speaking Russian equipment tends to be
sturdier.
• Russian
Mi-24 helicopters deployed in Syria seem to have anti-MANPADS
defensive systems such as optronic countermeasure systems. [Source]
• Only
some of the models seen in Syria appear to have the attachment. The
source shows Mi-24 with and without the countermeasure system
deployed at Latakia [Source]
• The
Mi-24 for some reason doesn’t have their exhaust suppressors
attached. That might be due to performance issues at low-altitudes.
Exhaust suppressors would reduce the IR signature of a helicopter,
reducing the effectiveness of MANPADS, most of which are guided by
infrared light. [Source]
• The
deployment of Russian helicopters in Tajikistan was probably due to
some SCO agreement to help the Tajik government handle any
ISIL-inspired groups within its territory such as their rogue defense
minister.
• The
SCO is probably why China is also mulling directly supporting the
Russian operation in Syria. If China should join the operation it’ll
be the first time their forces have entered combat since the Vietnam
war in the late 70s to 80s. [Source]
US:
• A
level of indecisiveness can be felt throughout the administration.
• The
US has declared it will continue ground operations, escalating their
involvement from token bombing runs to overt special operations.
[Source]
• There
are even talks that the US might go even deeper and further into
Syria and Iraq to fight ISIL. [Source]
• This
can be seen as a way to regain international credibility in its fight
against the Islamic State.
• Iraqi
forces along with Kurdish fighters committed to a ground operation
(recorded on video no less) freeing ISIL prisoners. [Source]
• US
Special Forces were helicopter-lifted inside the AO in an advisory
role.
• The
advisory role can mean anything from helping ground-level commanders
in tactical decisions (down to the company level; which means
probably leading from the front) to deploying on the field as a
support squad such as forward air observers or providing specialized
covering fire (sharpshooting, etc.)
Rebels
in Syria (including Al-Qaeda/Islamist affiliates such as Al-Nusra,
Army of Conquest, FSA, etc.):
• They
seem to be trying to survive the Syrian assaults and Russian air
strikes as best as they can.
• There
seems to be no shortage of TOWs.
• So
far the Russian air involvement has demoralized them more than any
other belligerent in Syria.
• The
Syrian Arab Army has made the majority of gains against these rebel
forces.
Saudi-Arabia
(and other GCC/Arab Coalition nations):
• More
talk and talk.
• Problems
in the Yemen, serious military problems.
• As
usual the GCC can’t really produce anything, not even soldiers, and
have hired foreign mercenaries from as far as Colombia to fight
against the Houthi Yemenis. [Source]
• Qatar
and the UAE have shuttled jihadists out of Syria and into Yemen.
• The
newly shuttled jihadists will probably try to counter not only the
Houthis but ISIL which has
• ISIL
will probably absorb the more effective parts of Al-Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula, stationed in Yemen.
Turkey:
• More
and more evidence of Turkish complicity in chemical attacks in Syria
are beginning to surface [Source]
• Turkey
understands that there is no solution to Syria without it being
involved. This is true as Syria and Turkey share a large
border. [Source]
• It
wasn’t long before a Kurdish bomb went off in Ankara, which can
only harden the Turks against any future Kurd deal. [Source]
Islamic
State:
• To
better illustrate Islamic States actions one has can look at its
roots.
• ISIL
has been an offshoot branch of Zarqawis Al-Qaeda.
• For
those that don’t know, Zarqawi was operating Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)
during the US occupation.
• Zarqawi
introduced ruthless tactics such as beheading foreigners, bombing
holy sacred sites, killing Muslims (Sunni or otherwise), etc.
• Although
original Al-Qaeda was still supporting Zarqawi (because his fighting
in Iraq was drawing in more recruiters to Al-Qaeda) generally they
disapproved of his overtly destructive methods.
• Al-Qaeda
in Iraq created the Al-Nusra Front in Syria during the crisis.
• A
cell within Al-Nusra Front began to achieve great success against
government Syrian forces.
• While
Al-Nusra was already violent, with rapes and mass executions in
captured territory, the cell within Al-Nusra was even more ruthless
by reviving Zarqarwis barbaric practices mixed with heavy enforcement
of Sharia law in territory under their control.
• Al-Nusra
(AQI) tried to reign in the rogue cell but it was already too big and
too influential.
• The
Islamic State was born (which has evolved from many names, ISIS,
ISIL, Daesh, IS….)
• Following
the Islamic States separation the organization tried to redress
grievances of Sunni and Ba’athist militias inside Iraq (the common
cause being fighting the Shia-dominated government of Iraq, for ISIS
the Shia are heretical muslims)
• Prior
to the Al-Nusra fracture, Ba’athist militias and Sunni tribes
actually fought Al-Qaeda because of their wonton killing of Iraqi
citizens (Zarqawi was pretty barbaric, so much so its roots are still
at the heart of ISIL nine years after his death).
Structure
of ISIL:
• There
seems to be more and more evidence that the Islamic State has a corp.
of ex-Iraqi military and intelligence officers in charge of critical
operations.
• These
officers have managed to help the Islamic State coordinate itself and
set up institutions to maintain the network required to keep the
Caliphate functioning. [Source]
[Source]
• Ba’athist
officers are not only hardened by the years of warfare against US
occupation forces and the Shia militias but also had experience in
statecraft being members of the ruling political party of Saddams
day.
• ISIL
is not one homogenous organizations but a large formation of multiple
militias, entities, organizations, intelligence agencies, Ba’athist
loyalists, tribes, etc. A loose alliance held together by several key
networks, one revealing itself now are the Ba’athist, another that
exposed itself was Turkish Intelligence.
• Who
is pulling what strings is yet to be known. Baghdadi may be just a
front man to the real actors behind the scene.
• During
the US occupation of Iraq, Syria had not only supported Ba’athist
loyalists but had allowed Sunni jihadists to travel freely into Iraq
to fight coalition forces.
• Iran
supported Shia militias which essentially became proxy forces. These
forces were used to deny the US the ability to secure Iraq. With Iraq
in a continued state of turmoil future operations into Iran or Syria
could not commence.
• The
agreement reached by ISIL and the Ba’athist loyalist militia
strengthened ISILs strategic and operational capabilities.
• The
trade was probably financing and materials given by ISIL to Ba’athist
militias in exchange for the expertise and connections as well as, of
course, a pledge of loyalty.
• The
expertise covers everything from training on weapon systems
(artillery, tanks, etc.), small-unit tactics, improvised explosives,
and even chemical weapons. [Source]
• After
the agreement the fall of Mosul, Fallujah, Ramadi, Baiji and Tikrit
followed which further furbished ISIL with more hardware, financing,
and manpower
• ISIL
had employed a psychological operation of consistently displaying
itself as barbarically ruthless, this is especially true online.
Ba’athist
Augmentation:
• The
most influential Ba’athist loyalist faction was created by ‘the
King of Clubs’ himself, GeneralIzzat Ibrahim al-Douri and his
Naqshbandi Order. [Source]
• The
Naqshbandi Order and ISIL have been seen fighting side by side in
Iraq as recent as 2014.
• Al-Douri
was a very skilled operational commander, he was head of the
Revolutionary Committee in Saddam’s government and had proven
himself in battle in the Iran-Iraq war as well as the First Gulf War.
• The
general proved his capabilities in a successful (albeit short lived)
coordination of Iraqi assets to aid in the capture of a Saudi town
during the early days of Operation Desert Storm. This was during the
relentless coalition air campaign which was bombing targets inside
Iraq and Iraqi military units inside Kuwait. [Source]
• To
achieve a minor success (the battle was, like all Iraqi battles,
lost) in such an environment is impressive as it reflects well on the
man’s strategic understanding of modern warfare. (This battle
included the shooting down of an AC-130 gunship).
• This
red-haired devil successfully evaded American forces throughout their
entire occupation but is now presumed dead (April 2015) in an Iraqi
army operation however it has not been confirmed by DNA and an audio
tape of (supposedly) Douri has been released speaking of events after
his death. [Source]
• These
are the same types of officers ISIL recruits from and have been
successful in molding ISIL forces into the practical force it is
today. Mostly operational-level commanders who have an understanding
in military organization and more importantly strategic competence.
• These
ex-officers practice a form of Ba’athist-Salafism, although Saddam
opposed Islamic politics in his early years of rule, in his late
years he began to preach about a Ba’athist, nationalist, Salafism
crossbreed philosophy.
• Saddam
Hussein had a Quran written in his own blood. Yet owned Golden AKs;
gold is haram for men in Islam. Just to reflect the nature of the man
and his view towards Islam. [Source]
• He
did warn however that the Islamists were not to be given full control
as they did not want a secular Iraq where religion was a personal
choice but to establish an Islamic state [Source]
Jihadist
Tactics, Ba’athist Operations, Caliphate Strategy:
• The
Islamic State utilizes what some might consider unconventional
“fringe” tactics such
as distributing amphetamine-like products to fighters (this has been
witnessed as early as the 2003 invasion by incoming Syrian jihadist
during the US occupation of Iraq).
• It’s
most likely that the Saudi prince caught for trying to smuggle tons
of Fenethylline through Beirut was going to hand them over to
ISIL-affiliates. [Source]
• A
mixture of religious scripture, amphetamines, and heavy weapons
introduced to boys at an influential age of their lives (and denied
the prospects of having a girlfriend) may highlight the indifference
seen in ISIL fighters in the acts of barbarity they commit. [Source]
• Of
course Ba’athist officers have used the barbarity as a method of
spreading terror to their opponents.
• ISIL
also has some mastery in psychological warfare. The capture of Mosul
highlighted how just a little over a 1000 men can overcome an army
10+ times its size by terrorizing them to abandon their positions.
[Source]
• This
psychological warfare comes in the form of brutal execution and
torture videos, the capture and rape of women and children in the
Islamic Caliphate, the videos of legitimacy (such as undertaking
state functions like courts, hospitals, street cleaning, opening up
ISIL souvenir shops, flag production, coin minting, etc.)
• In
terms of financing the Islamic State enjoys a variety of incomes,
including donations by true believers and sales of oil on the black
market.
• ISIL
has no trouble finding recruits. For example the residence of Mosul
feel betrayed by the mostly Shia Iraqi military for abandoning them,
it’s not hard to find recruits amongst these Sunnis who have
already fled Shia death squads supported by the government in its
earlier years. [Source]
• Many
Al-Qaeda or Islamist militias have pledged loyalty to ISIL which has
allowed the Islamic State to have power in a multitude of countries.
On
the Syrian-Iraqi Campaign:
• The
Islamic State seems to be committing to attacks against Syrian
government forces but not capturing territory.
• Harassment
on Syrian supply routes have been more common. The longer the supply
route the harder it is to maintain security on it. Offensives have
been stalled due to the effective strategy.
• This
was the same tactic the Ba’athists refused to use on invading US
forces, who also had supply lines stretched thin due to overextended
assaults.
• All
this indicates a long-term resistance, keeping the Syrian government
forces occupied while ISIL regroups.
• In
Iraq the Islamic State is pressed to find a new vector to attack the
Iraqi government.
• Just
like in Syria ISIL is consistently harassing the Iraqi military with
suicide attacks while the Iraqi military continues its thrust into
Anbar province.
• ISIL
still seems determined to fight with fierce resistance even though
it’s facing forces from all sides.
• Right
now most (but not all) ISIL branches outside Syria and Iraq are
funneling in fighters from their respective regions (like Libya).
• Iraqi
government has been trying to talk to the Ba’athists to shift ISILs
center of gravity however to what level of success that would bring
is very unclear [Source]
International
Military Review – Syria-Iraq Battlespace , Oct. 30, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.